Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2016, 10:24 AM   #1
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default planting next to a swale - bylaw

I hate to make a thread for this but I'm going to do it anyway because I could really use some help. I think I'm allowed one "meh" thread every six months.

Does anyone know the city of calgary bylaw regarding planting next to swales? From the picture below I'm unclear if I can plant the trunk of a tree 1.2 meters from the center of the swale or should the edge of the tree not encroach into the area 1.2 meters from the center of the swale?

Any help is really appreciated. I called 311 but they won't get back to you for up to four weeks. The reason I don't just plant further away and be done with it is because it's a waste of space and the shadowing effect on the tree.



https://www.calgary.ca/UEP/Water/Doc...f?noredirect=1
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:32 AM   #2
rohara66
First Line Centre
 
rohara66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

The way that reads you cannot plant within 1.2m on either side.

With that said I'd plant where ever I felt like it, people plant within that area all the time.
rohara66 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rohara66 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 10:35 AM   #3
OMG!WTF!
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

It looks to me like the edge of the tree to the center of the swale must be 1.2 meters. The total clearance is 2.4. That said, any roots interfering with the concrete or drainage would be your responsibility to fix. So it might just he better to back off a little and also pick the right tree. I don't see the city coming out to measure unless there is a problem.
OMG!WTF! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:36 AM   #4
Ace
First Line Centre
 
Ace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Actually the picture shows the total "surface drainage facility" as 2.4 meters, which tends to imply it's 1.2 from the centre.
__________________
Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:37 AM   #5
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

It's a measurement of things in the ground, not overhang from things above it.

You are responsible for keeping the swale clear though, so keep that in mind when choosing what you're planting.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:41 AM   #6
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

I have a swale that runs across the length of my back yard.

I along with several neighbors have built a fence parallel with the swale and the fence is within the 1.2 m encroachment area. I also have trees planted with the area as well.

I had no idea this area exsisted and I just built along my property line like the rest of the crowd - I also have no idea if the city knows about this or not, but I am prepared to let sleeping dogs lie.

did you try calling the city building department - I would think they could give you some guidance right ont he phone.
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:41 AM   #7
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

Yep. 1.2m for the "structure" from the centre of the swale.

As noted above, much like any other non-privately owned facility (swale, ROW, gas lines, etc.), if your infrastructure (tree roots, sheds, deck, etc.) interferes with or damages the facility, the owner is within their right to remove/destroy it.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 11:08 AM   #8
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The problem with just doing whatever you want is that when it's time to sell the house you need a real property report. The rpr checks for anything you built outside of the city of Calgary bylaws. Makes it a headache to sell the house.
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stampsx2 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 11:10 AM   #9
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohara66 View Post
The way that reads you cannot plant within 1.2m on either side.

With that said I'd plant where ever I felt like it, people plant within that area all the time.
Backing off four or five feet is a lot with the size of properties the city allows.
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 11:27 AM   #10
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

My question is why is the property line fence exempt from the 1.2m rule?
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 12:02 PM   #11
Angelamc
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:
Default

Swale or no swale I wouldn't recommend planting a tree that close to your fence anyhow, the tree needs room to grow up and out.
Angelamc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 12:24 PM   #12
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

i planted columnar aspens all along the swale about 8" inside the edge. I'm not giving up 3-4' of yard because of a city bylaw. just dig the base of the tree below the swale so the roots wont grow into it.\

As others mentioned, if there ever is an issue it will be removed at your cost. I was prepared to accept that risk, make sure you are before planting.
MacDaddy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MacDaddy77 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 01:28 PM   #13
Rhettzky
Franchise Player
 
Rhettzky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stampsx2 View Post
I hate to make a thread for this but I'm going to do it anyway because I could really use some help. I think I'm allowed one "meh" thread every six months.

Does anyone know the city of calgary bylaw regarding planting next to swales? From the picture below I'm unclear if I can plant the trunk of a tree 1.2 meters from the center of the swale or should the edge of the tree not encroach into the area 1.2 meters from the center of the swale?

Any help is really appreciated. I called 311 but they won't get back to you for up to four weeks. The reason I don't just plant further away and be done with it is because it's a waste of space and the shadowing effect on the tree.
Do you know what the width of the Overland Drainage Right-of-way (ODR) on your lot is? The image you provided from the lot drainage bylaw is for the current standard which provides a 1.8m wide ODR on the lot the swale is located within, and a 0.6m wide ODR on the adjacent lot.

Before that standard the ODR was evenly split at 1.2m on each property regardless of swale location. So you can check and see but the ODR may not be as it is shown in that image. If you tell me the area you live in I can probably check for you, but it would also be on your RPR.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
Rhettzky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 03:44 PM   #14
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

10 internet points to the first poster that gets this reference.

SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 05:41 PM   #15
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I got it!
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 06:12 PM   #16
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It sounds to me like this is one of those bylaws that's only enforced if someone complains like kids playing street hockey, fences over six feet or someone washing their muddy car in the driveway.

When I spoke to bylaw they weren't too sure about it and would have to do more research. Not a common concern I guess. With that said, as I look outside, every second property is in violation of this bylaw, trees, garage pads, structures.
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 06:53 PM   #17
pope04
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Virgin Connie Swail?
pope04 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pope04 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 07:19 PM   #18
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

Anecdote time! Guy across the street from me just sold his house. Got the Property Report done and the new owners insisted it be compliant. He had a ton of mature plantings next to the swale and inbetween the swale and the fence (theres nearly three feet between the edge of the swale and the fence, its weird, but the fence is on the property line, i think the swale got put in wrong) Anyways after they insisted on compliance, him and I and three other neighbours spent a day digging all these plants up and replanting them split amongst our houses.
My backyard looks beautiful now. His not so much. The new people are getting a blank slate.
puffnstuff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 07:42 PM   #19
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

What kind of real property report lists all the trees and shrubs? That would be some highly irregular report, and I don't think the city would even comment or look at plantings to give the stamp. Most RoWs or easements mention plantings, but I've never heard it come up in an RPR, hell, the city doesn't even comment on unattached buildings smaller than 100 square feet on RPRs, let alone an aspen or bush.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2016, 11:10 PM   #20
Ryan Coke
#1 Goaltender
 
Ryan Coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Just be aware of the potential downside risk. I had a professional landscape design and a landscaper do my previous house with a swale, and did it in violation of the right of way.

If for any reason a guy from the city comes out (complaint, whether it is directly related or not) and realizes you are in violation then you get to rip things up. I ended up having to spend several days ripping up the work and redoing it, else I was going to get a big bill from the city (for them to do the work and a fine). Friggen sucked.
Ryan Coke is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy