Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2016, 09:32 AM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Flames Friedman's 30 thoughts: Asking price for Brian Elliott? Hutton has a role?

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/3...c-possibility/

Lots of rumors/speculation including this tidbit on the Flames:

Quote:
2. It’s also very possible Tim Murray doesn’t want to deal No. 8 because he’s trying to moving up, anywhere from three (Columbus) to six (Calgary). This is a home game for the Sabres and Murray loves to gamble.
Quote:
4. The Calgary Flames’ goalie search continues. GM Brad Treliving has his hands everywhere, so it’s difficult to pin down the exact target, but I think Brian Elliott would be very happy to go there. The Flames have three second-rounders (35, 54, 56) and you could see the St. Louis Blues liking that first one. Where it gets complicated is if Blues GM Doug Armstrong wants assurances of extra compensation in case Calgary extends Elliott. Elliott comes at a lower cost in both trade pieces and contract than Ben Bishop, and will have a major chip on his shoulder after his last few games in Missouri. I’ve seen reports the ask for Marc-Andre Fleury is worth a first-round pick, but it might be even more than that. He’s signed long-term.
Quote:
5. Another goalie I could see with a role in Calgary? Carter Hutton.

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-24-2016 at 09:35 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:34 AM   #2
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Hutton would be strictly for the backup position.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:34 AM   #3
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Hutton would be after Reimer in the grand scheme of things which means the weekend didnt go so well for Treliving and Co.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:34 AM   #4
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I don't see Hutton as a starter.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:35 AM   #5
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Hutton would be a really good backup IMO, he's clearly not a starter but I think he could be a backup that steps up if need be.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:35 AM   #6
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Elliot/Hutton would be more than fine with me
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:35 AM   #7
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Hutton wouldn't be a starter, but to replace Ortio as backup? I could see it. If it has been decided that Ortio won't develop into starter, and there are better backups on the market, why stick with Ortio?

Elliott definitely wouldn't be near the top of my list.

- 31 years old
- The most starts he's handled was 55, and it was in 09/10.
- Hasn't played more than 46 games since 09/10.
- UFA after 16/17, and do we really have an appetite to extend a 32 year old for the years he's going to want (likely 4-5?).

No thanks to Elliott.

Last edited by ComixZone; 06-24-2016 at 09:40 AM.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:35 AM   #8
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

I don't see Hutton as a backup
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:36 AM   #9
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Elliot really is a great exit route to the madness of Pittsburgh and Tampa and their asking prices.

If they want the first + then you simply say f this, I'm going to get Elliot and at worst revisit this next season, when you two dummies are in panic mode.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:37 AM   #10
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I agree that acquisition cost and cap hit is just too high for Bishop or Fleury, and I don't think either of them is that much better than Elliott to warrant the difference.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:38 AM   #11
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Maybe the Bishop and Fleury talks are just setting the ceiling for Brad to operate under.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:45 AM   #12
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Elliott has been my hope all along. Ideal contract situation as well. Bishop is better, but not $3M better
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:48 AM   #13
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
Elliott has been my hope all along. Ideal contract situation as well. Bishop is better, but not $3M better
He also is the only established goalie with a cheap enough contract that will allow the team to pursue Reimer as well. Both are established tandem 1A/1B goalies and I think they would be great here playing about 40 games each.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:51 AM   #14
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

A 2nd round pick for Elliot? Boy was i wrong about cheap acquisition cost for trading for a goalie. I would have thought a 3rd/4th rounder would be the price for Elliot.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:51 AM   #15
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

As I said in another thread, we better be cautious in case the Flames trade for a backup first. Too many people will be up in arms because of all the talk about Fleury, Bishop etc. and then they get a backup?
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Buff For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:53 AM   #16
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
A 2nd round pick for Elliot? Boy was i wrong about cheap acquisition cost for trading for a goalie. I would have thought a 3rd/4th rounder would be the price for Elliot.
Yup, Expansion did nothing to put a dent in those asking prices.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:57 AM   #17
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Yup, Expansion did nothing to put a dent in those asking prices.
I'm sure asking prices are still high on properties in London today as well. Doesn't mean buyers are going to give them that.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:57 AM   #18
Johnny Rotten
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Johnny Rotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Exp:
Default

I can believe Pittsburgh wants a first round pick plus for Fleury, but I can't expect that they will get that kind of return.
__________________
You’ll find that empty vessels make the most sound.
-Johnny Rotten
Johnny Rotten is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Rotten For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 10:12 AM   #19
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

I'll judge BT's summer success rate in Oct. Right now I love the way BT is playing this game.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 10:14 AM   #20
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I don't think a 2nd round pick for an established NHL starter from one of the leagues best teams is a hefty price to pay. Especially when he is cheap, and likely to be cheaper than pretty much every other option going forward.

Pull the trigger on Elliott.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy