06-07-2016, 11:01 AM
|
#1
|
Had an idea!
|
CP Party Leader Candidate wants to phase out CRTC
Quote:
The Canadian Radio Telecommunications Commission has made itself a powerful enemy. Maxime Bernier, a candidate for the Conservative leadership, stated at the Canadian Telecom Summit that the CRTC should be phased out.
“Presumably in order to protect competition, the CRTC was preventing some providers from really competing and offering better deals to consumers. That’s what I call a policy of false competition,” Bernier said in his address at the summit.
Bernier is a former minister of Industry and held the role of Opposition critic for Innovation, Science and Economic Development just a few months ago. He recently announced his candidacy for the leadership of the conservative party. He is currently serving as a Member of Parliament for the riding Beauce in Quebec.
During his address Bernier also claimed that the CRTC has stifled competition with several decisions, including the recent announcement that large network providers will be forced to sell space on their high-speed infrastructure to smaller rivals at wholesale prices. Bell petitioned heavily against the decision, saying it would impact competition and investment in new technologies.
He went on to say the the telecom industry is a mature, competitive market and shouldn’t be treated as a “playground for bureaucrats.”
“Canadian consumers are best served when telecom providers are free to compete and invest, not when bureaucrats tell them what to do,” Bernier went on to say.
With these claims, he introduced several proposals to supposedly improve competition in the Canadian telecom market. These include eliminating the mandated sharing of networks, relieve the CRTC of its role as a telecom regulator, hold spectrum auctions without preferential rules “so that everyone is on a level-playing field,” and opening the sector fully to foreign investments.
It’s important to note that American telecom companies have attempted to enter the Canadian market in the past. In 2013, when it was speculated that Verizon would make a spectrum bid for entrance into Canada, Rogers Communications Inc., Bell’s parent company BCE Inc. and TELUS Corp. launched a campaign in opposition of this entry, stating that a foreign company would have an unfair advantage.
|
http://mobilesyrup.com/2016/06/07/co...m-competition/
Interesting take. The decision to force wholesale rates for backhaul bandwidth will create more competition in the internet industry, so backtracking that would certainly create a problem.
He is correct in saying that if Verizon or another big player would enter the Canadian market it would drive prices down.
But then again, if Shaw built out Wind a lot faster it would also create more competition. Why would a brand new carrier spend billions to build a network?
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 11:06 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
|
I wonder what his rich business friends and share holders for Shaw/TELUS/Bell/Rogers are thinking when they read this. The CRTC, I'm sure, gets on their nerves but with no regulator it wouldn't be long before this country was dominated by big American telco.
__________________
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 11:15 AM
|
#3
|
Had an idea!
|
How are our plans comparable to the US?
The whole pitch does read like a scripted speech from the big 3.
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 11:18 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
|
Toot toot, now leaving Net Neutrality, all aboard the train to Preferred Bandwidth Town!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 11:24 AM
|
#5
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
Toot toot, now leaving Net Neutrality, all aboard the train to Preferred Bandwidth Town!
|
Bingo.
Robellus knows full well what the FCC is trying to do to ISPs in the states, and really doesn't want to see the CRTC do that here. Not to mention they, along with Shaw, are royally pissed about things like the skinny package mandate for TV.
Solution: buy your political influence now!
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 11:35 AM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
In Theory “Canadian consumers are best served when telecom providers are free to compete and invest, not when bureaucrats tell them what to do,” Bernier went on to say.
In reality, the big 3 will just tighten their grip.
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 05:29 PM
|
#7
|
Had an idea!
|
What they SHOULD do is open the industry up for foreign investment and see what happens.
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 10:49 PM
|
#8
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Unregulated oligopolies seems like a bad idea. Government-sponsored oligopolies are also a bad idea. Bernier basically just cancelled out his position on dairy supply management for me.
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#9
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Why does he sound like lobbyist/shill for the big 3 telecom providers?
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 10:47 AM
|
#10
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Because he is.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.
|
|