I currently have a set of computer glasses with these lenses in them:
http://nikon-lenswear.com/products/e...eries/relaxsee and this coating
http://www.nikonlenswear.ca/en/produ...s/seecoat-blue
The screen tends to be a little bit crisper and eye strain takes a little longer to set in (I have high astigmatism with keratoconus so I blur out more then the average person and my "crisp" is pretty subjective). I believe my prescription in these specific lenses were tailored more for computer or short distance use as well so that basically, I have super computer vision glasses or something. I have to switch between these and my normal ones as my distance vision for driving in these is a little less.
I can't comment on the science, but I can say I've worn glasses for 25 years or so now, the last 15 with HEAVY computer usage and I did find that these blue light lenses cut down on my headaches and eye strain enough to say there was a noticeable difference. Now if that's psychosomatic or actual science, I don't know. That's more of a Hes question I think. The information I was given about lenses choices, it didn't seem to be claiming anything outrageous and reasonable.
I second gasman on the colour distortion though. I have noticed a pink hue in them when I put them on, but it's not constantly noticeable when you wear them. My co-workers see it more when I'm wearing it. If you regularly do graphic design or something like that, might not be the best option as the colours are a bit off. Not drastic like blue is red or anything weird like that, but I've noticed if I'm working with red or pink colours, I'm seeing two shades when my glasses are on and off. Even just on CP now, that background is a lighter, muted red with my glasses on and a darker red with them off.
I believe for pricing, they were only $50-100 more then what I usually pay for my normal lenses, so it's not an unreasonable cost. Granted, I'm already looking at $500 for lenses so I don't really notice the extra $50 at that point.