06-18-2016, 04:57 PM
|
#1
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Flames aggressively trying to move up. UPD: Treliving and Kekelainen meeting on floor
Yes it is Garrioch so take with grain of salt.
http://www.ottawasun.com/2016/06/18/...r-at-nhl-draft
Quote:
The chatter is only going to increase in the coming days as the teams at the top of the draft listen intently to what those who are trying to move up are willing to offer. One of the most aggressive on that front is Calgary Flames GM Brad Treliving, who is currently sitting at No. 6 in the annual crapshoot.
Ideally, the Flames would like to get into the top three or four and the Columbus Blue Jackets, Vancouver Canucks and Edmonton Oilers are listening to all offers because it never hurts to see what other teams are offering. But that’s where this becomes muddy because nobody is sure what Calgary is willing to give up.
The Flames want a shot at one of those top-end forwards like winger Jesse Puljujarvi (Finland) or London winger Matthew Tkachuk. There’s not a chance either of those two players will be there by the time Calgary is scheduled to pick at No. 6 so it doesn’t hurt Treliving to at least make an attempt to move.
|
|
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:00 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
That would be very sick.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:02 PM
|
#3
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Interesting, and exciting. I don't doubt this is going on, and if a big move happens I will be very intrigued by the cost.
|
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:04 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
that would be awesome. Depends on acquisition cost though ... last year, Toronto wanted three 2nds (34, 38 and 58) from Columbus to trade up from 8 to 4.
|
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:06 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
I'd happily hand over 6, 35, 54, 56 to get Puljujarvi.
|
|
|
The Following 42 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
1_Flames_Fan,
Allos,
anyonebutedmonton,
Badgers Nose,
bc-chris,
bdubbs,
CalgaryFan1988,
Clever_Iggy,
Dan02,
DaQwiz,
drew24,
Flames Draft Watcher,
flamesforcup,
Flames_F.T.W,
Francis's Hairpiece,
Frequitude,
Gaskal,
GranteedEV,
GreenLantern2814,
Heavy Jack,
iLoveLamp,
jayswin,
jeffman,
Kipper is King,
kyuss275,
Lil Pedro,
mile,
Mony,
Neeper,
normtwofinger,
Patek23,
Playfair,
rogermexico,
saskflames69,
Savvy27,
smiggy77,
Split98,
Steveyoto,
Table 5,
The Hendog,
Titan,
Vinny01
|
06-18-2016, 05:07 PM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
|
Knew it.
|
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:08 PM
|
#7
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Not sure
|
Doesn't he say something like this every year about the Flames?
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by Bingo.
Maybe he hates cowboy boots.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to keratosis For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:09 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
I'd happily hand over 6, 35, 54, 56 to get Puljujarvi.
|
I would too. I think the Flames are now past the point of needing quantity and have to go for quality. I know at the end of the day the Flames will likely still be picking 6th, but I would love to nab the third pick.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to N-E-B For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:11 PM
|
#9
|
First Line Centre
|
#6 & Hanowski for #3. DO IT FEASTER.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:11 PM
|
#10
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
I'd happily hand over 6, 35, 54, 56 to get Puljujarvi.
|
I would too. It seems like a lot but it's essentially 3 lottery tickets for a guy that checks off a lot of organizational needs.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Racki For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:13 PM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
|
The only reason not to shell out all 3 2nds is getting a goalie, which has to be more of a priority than 18 year old winger.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:15 PM
|
#12
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Garrioch has actually been right about a couple Flames related things in the recent past... I am now giving his stuff more credence than I previously would have.
|
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:16 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
I would argue that the drop from 4 to 8 last year was at least as big as the drop from 3 to 6 this year.
Having to give up all 3 2nds would be painful. So its probably a fair trade.
They want out of the Hartnell contract (and we could use his grit). How about something like:
#3 + Hartnell for #6 + Colborne + 2nd
|
|
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
Bonecrushing Hits,
Cali Panthers Fan,
Chonger,
Demetric,
flamesfan1297,
Flamesfan2010,
flamesforcup,
Funkhouser,
ignite09,
iLoveLamp,
Inferno099,
memphusk,
saskflames69,
smiggy77,
Steveyoto,
Textcritic,
theTrumanShow,
wired
|
06-18-2016, 05:17 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major
The only reason not to shell out all 3 2nds is getting a goalie, which has to be more of a priority than 18 year old winger.
|
Reimer and Puljujarvi > most of the other goalies and no Puljujarvi
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
|
anyonebutedmonton,
Ashasx,
btimbit,
CalgaryFan1988,
DaQwiz,
Domoic,
flamesfan1297,
flamesforcup,
Gaskal,
Hackey,
Heavy Jack,
Housley4Prez,
iLoveLamp,
Jay Random,
Loudog,
mile,
Mony,
OffsideSpecialist,
PatRiggin,
polak,
Rick M.,
rogermexico,
SixtySix
|
06-18-2016, 05:17 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
#6 & Hanowski for #3. DO IT FEASTER.
|
That would make sense but only if it happens now.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:18 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
#6 & Hanowski for #3. DO IT FEASTER.
|
It's old bud. Very old.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to memphusk For This Useful Post:
|
CalgaryFan1988,
Chonger,
Domoic,
Flames Draft Watcher,
flamesfan1297,
Flamezzz,
MisterJoji,
Neeper,
Savvy27,
Vox,
Wolfman,
Yoho
|
06-18-2016, 05:20 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Reimer and Puljujarvi > most of the other goalies and no Puljujarvi
|
Exactly. Many people stated they would be happy with Nylander and Fleury.
I would much rather have Puljujarvi and Reimer.
|
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:21 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
It sure will be interesting to me watching to see who has the better career between Puljujarvi and Nylander/Brown/Jost/Keller
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:23 PM
|
#19
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Garrioch: Flames aggressively trying to move into top 3 or 4 of draft
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
I'd happily hand over 6, 35, 54, 56 to get Puljujarvi.
|
That is too much. I would maybe offer 6, 35, 56, but would much prefer something along the lines of Enoch Root's proposal.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2016, 05:29 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
That is too much. I would maybe offer 6, 35, 56, but would much prefer something along the lines of Enoch Root's proposal.
|
given what Toronto wanted from Columbus last year, I think it's pretty realistic. And I think I'd do it ... Puljujarvi is just in another tier than Nylander.
to put names to it: we had our CPHL draft today, and the picks at 6, 35, 54 and 56 were Alexander Nylander, Dennis Cholowski, Jack Kopacka and Filip Gustavsson. Would you rather have Puljujarvi or Nylander, Cholowski, Kopacka and Gustavsson? To me it's an easy choice.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM.
|
|