The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DJones For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:04 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
It looked like Hartley was playing Stajan with Backlund a lot last night. It seemed to work out well. I've always felt bad that he has had to carry Bollig around all year. How would people feel about putting him on a wing?
Could add some experience to Bennett's line or -
A Stajan - Backlund - Frolik line would be a nightmare to play against.
Get him some points next year so we can hopefully ship him off at the deadline.
Thoughts?
|
Going to wing instead of centre could, if nothing else, extend his career - the defensive footspeed isn't as big an issue, for example.
It also frees up the 4th line centre spot for Grant/Arnold/Shore/Jankowski.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:12 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
Stajan has been able to morph his roles in the past and has been adaptable.
Since there is likely no chance he gets traded this off-season, I don't see a reason why you can't play him with Backlund if the 4th line has decent options from the farm.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:17 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
|
He is a versatile veteran on the team. He is a decent bottom 6 player who brings good work ethic to the team. I wouldn't mind seeing him on the wing, or as a 4th line center
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:19 AM
|
#5
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ...the bench
|
i like him on the wing so we can get our farm guys some time on the 4th.
if he plays like that with Backlund all the time....it will be a huge boon.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:19 AM
|
#6
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
|
It's hard to say because of how awful the Canucks are, but he certainly seemed rejuvenated playing on the wing with Backlund.
The move played right into his strengths, and masked his weaknesses. We all know Stajan is a great passer and a fairly cerebral player. If there is less skating per shift on the wing it's probably a beneficial change for a guy who has lost a couple steps.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hatter For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:25 AM
|
#7
|
First Line Centre
|
Stajan's also not a strong faceoff guy and he doesn't do well in the dirty areas. He can't do much worse than Raymond did, but ideally Stajan wouldn't be taking a roster spot from somebody more deserving.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:29 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio
Stajan's also not a strong faceoff guy and he doesn't do well in the dirty areas. He can't do much worse than Raymond did, but ideally Stajan wouldn't be taking a roster spot from somebody more deserving.
|
He's second highest on the team (of the regular centres) after Monahan and slightly ahead of Backlund.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:34 AM
|
#9
|
Scoring Winger
|
I know it was a meaningless game, but he stood out A LOT to me last night playing wing. Could be a smart transition for him in his twilight years
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 09:36 AM
|
#10
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Based on Grant's play early this season coupled with his outrageous AHL year and Stajan's struggles I thought Grant had a decent chance of earning that 4th line centre role on merit. If Grant hadn't broken his jaw in practice I really think he might've cemented himself a spot already.
They tried Grant at wing this recent call up but it looked forced and Grant looked lost. If Stajan can play on Backlunds wing it solves a couple problems at once, freeing up the 4th line centre role for the bigger, stronger Grant who has some faceoff prowess.
Imagine our 3rd/4th lines as the following
Stajan-Backlund-Colborne
Bouma-Grant-Hathaway
That 4th line would be an absolute pain to play against. And that 3rd line could be one of the best two way checking lines in the league. Me likey.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:01 AM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
|
With Stajan at wing the possibilities could get interesting for next year.
How about these 4 lines??
Shinkaruk?-Monahan-Gaudreau
Frolik-Bennett-Ferland
Stajan-Backlund-Colborne
Bouma-Grant-Hathaway
Hmmm.....
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:05 AM
|
#12
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
|
Hard to say as we played a horrible AHL team last night. Im sure he could adapt though.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:07 AM
|
#13
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl
With Stajan at wing the possibilities could get interesting for next year.
How about these 4 lines??
Shinkaruk?-Monahan-Gaudreau
Frolik-Bennett-Ferland
Stajan-Backlund-Colborne
Bouma-Grant-Hathaway
|
Compared with;
Johnny Gaudreau - Sean Monahan - Jiri Hudler
Lance Bouma - Mikael Backlund - Michael Frolik
Micheal Ferland - Sam Bennett - Josh Jooris
Brandon Bollig - Matt Stajan - David Jones
At the start of the year.
I think that's a playoff team. Use the cap space on a #4 defense rather than a RW and let our prospects fill the whole eventually.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:24 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Sure why not Stajan on the wing. But Backlund has made a lot of guys look better this season, so as others have said, wouldn't read too much into that one game. But certainly it's an option to keep in mind.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:28 AM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl
With Stajan at wing the possibilities could get interesting for next year.
How about these 4 lines??
Shinkaruk?-Monahan-Gaudreau
Frolik-Bennett-Ferland
Stajan-Backlund-Colborne
Bouma-Grant-Hathaway
Hmmm.....
|
Is there any particular reason why you have several players on the off-wing?
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:30 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal
Is there any particular reason why you have several players on the off-wing?
|
No.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Karl For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:55 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
These would be my ideal lines
Gaudreau-Monahan-Matthews
Shinkaruk-Bennett-Porier
Colborne-Backlund-Frolik
Ferland-Grant-Hathaway
Gotta find new homes for Stajan, Bollig, Bouma
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 11:58 AM
|
#18
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
These would be my ideal lines
Gaudreau-Monahan-Matthews
Shinkaruk-Bennett-Porier
Colborne-Backlund-Frolik
Ferland-Grant-Hathaway
Gotta find new homes for Stajan, Bollig, Bouma
|
Gaudreau would be the oldest guy in the top 6.
Somehow I doubt that would work haha.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 12:06 PM
|
#19
|
First Line Centre
|
No thanks. It was one meaningless game against a garbage team that was on the golf course. I think if Stajan to the wing was an actual thing, it would have been done far sooner than game 81 of a dead season. Its a one off and I personally have no wish for it to be repeated.
|
|
|
04-08-2016, 12:10 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
I think moving Stajan to the wing is worth taking a look at. He has some skill and it's mostly wasted on the 4th line playing with plugs.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 AM.
|
|