View Poll Results: Result: 1 bad / 10 amazing
|
10
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
9
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
8
|
  
|
2 |
1.68% |
7
|
  
|
18 |
15.13% |
6
|
  
|
23 |
19.33% |
5
|
  
|
47 |
39.50% |
4
|
  
|
21 |
17.65% |
3
|
  
|
6 |
5.04% |
2
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
1
|
  
|
2 |
1.68% |
04-13-2016, 07:01 AM
|
#1
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Simulator Fix : April 13th
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2016, 07:03 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
this one's pretty meh. At least the Flames get #6 pick but that still isn't the most ideal situation but it could be a lot worse.
But BOTH Montreal and Toronto getting top 3 picks....we'd only hear about the battle of the Finns for few years I guess.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 07:09 AM
|
#3
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ...the bench
|
Edm and van out? Just needed flames forward! We're trending in the right direction!
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 07:14 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Where's the vote?
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 07:15 AM
|
#5
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
up now
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 07:30 AM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I voted 4 because moving down a spot to me isn't a win.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 07:35 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
This is basically a best-case scenario for the Flames not winning a top-3 spot. No Oilers, no Van, the Leafs don't draft 1st, and the Flames only drop one. Pretty dang good.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:05 AM
|
#8
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
I give it a 7. We didn't drop much and get a great player to play alongside Bennett. About as good as you could ask for, outside of a lottery pick.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:10 AM
|
#9
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
The other plus is all three top picks landing in the East.
I'm with those that like this one. Sure it doesn't push the Flames up but they're passed by the right teams and their rivals take it on the chin.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:13 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
I gave it a 4, because we move down and I really don't like Montreal.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:18 AM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
|
I'll give it a 6. Edmonton and Vancouver don't get a top 3 spot, nor does Toronto get the guy they were after from day 1. Columbus also gets the franchise centre they've needed since they traded Johansen, which helps that market out. All 3 teams are in the East, meaning we wouldn't have to face Matthews or the 2 Finns more than twice a season. Sucks in the sense that we move down a spot, but I'd take this outcome if I had to.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:33 AM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Wow...had a super strange result today, but I would qualify it as a huge success.
1st: Ottawa
2nd: Arizona
3rd: Calgary
4th: Toronto
5th:Edmonton
6th: Vancouver
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:43 AM
|
#13
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
|
I gave it a 5. Pretty "meh" result. On one hand, Vancouver or Edmonton aren't in the top 3. On the other hand, either are the Flames.
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:49 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
There's only a 25% chance we draft top 3. This is more about mitigating the awfulness potential in the 75% in my opinion.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:58 AM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
Baby steps I guess! 4
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 08:58 AM
|
#16
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Yeah, given the odds this is about a 6 or 7.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 09:00 AM
|
#17
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
A link to the lottery simulator in the story would be cool.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 09:01 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
Columbus winning the lottery is fine by me.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 09:17 AM
|
#19
|
In the Sin Bin
|
3. Still dropped a spot. If we drop it will always be 3 or lower.
Don't mind the outcome otherwise.
Ugh, mine sucked again.
1. Toronto
2. Arizona
3. Jets
-
7. Calgary
This is a depressing exercise. Every one off I've done since Bingo started doing his has Calgary dropping.
|
|
|
04-13-2016, 09:45 AM
|
#20
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
This is a depressing exercise. Every one off I've done since Bingo started doing his has Calgary dropping.
|
I'm killing all the negative Karma day by day until late April.
Everyone will owe me.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 PM.
|
|