11-24-2015, 11:12 PM
|
#1
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Smid assigned to Stockton on conditioning stint UPD: Recalled on Nov 27.
Calgary Flames @NHLFlames
The #Flames have assigned Ladislav Smid to Stockton on a conditioning assignment. He will play for the Heat tomorrow.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:13 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
|
Is there someone from Stockton being called up I wonder?
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:14 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
I thought you had to be coming back from injury to qualify for conditioning stint? He has been back a while and has played a couple of games.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#4
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
Smid assigned to Stockton on conditioning stint
What's the eligibility for this? You would think they would have sent Ortio for this as well. Unless they intend playing him Friday
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
Last edited by hockey.modern; 11-24-2015 at 11:17 PM.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#5
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Smid still occupies a roster space during conditioning stint. And the flames are either in, or close to California, that if an injury happened they could get him hack really quickly.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dying4acup For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Yeah this is a bit suspicious, he's played games already. I'm sure it is all legit but it does seem fishy.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:19 PM
|
#7
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Technically you don't have to be injured to be sent on a conditioning stint. A player just has to agree to it
If the league determines you are using a conditioning stint to evade waivers or circumvent another CBA provision, they can take action and punish a team.
A conditioning stint like this can only be for a maximum of 14 consecutive days.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#8
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Yeah this is a bit suspicious, he's played games already. I'm sure it is all legit but it does seem fishy.
|
I don't think it's suspicious, I think it's a good opportunity with the flames being in California. Might have been done a few days ago if Russell hadn't got hurt.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
I thought you had to be coming back from injury to qualify for conditioning stint? He has been back a while and has played a couple of games.
|
Apparently not as Duhatschek was saying on the Fan 960 today that the Flames might ask Ortio to go down to Stockton for a couple of weeks on a conditioning stint - apparently all that is needed is the agreement of the player.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Gaudfather For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Technically you don't have to be injured to be sent on a conditioning stint. A player just has to agree to it
If the league determines you are using a conditioning stint to circumvent waivers or another CBA provision, they can take action and punish a team.
A conditioning stint like this can only be for a maximum of 14 consecutive days.
|
I guess that's why they never tried it with Ortio. If there ever was a team that could send 4-5 players down on conditioning stint , this years flames are the one.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:24 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
|
It's not suspicious because the Flames would hope Smid would be claimed on waivers.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:35 PM
|
#12
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
interesting to see how many games he will play in Stockton.
Stockton plays an away game @ Ontario tomorrow (which is right next to LA)
Stockton plays a home game vs Bakersfield on Friday (Flames will be nearby for Saturday's game vs San Jose)
Stockton plays an away game @ Bakersfield on Saturday.
Then Stockton doesn't play again until Dec 4.
|
|
|
11-24-2015, 11:47 PM
|
#13
|
First Line Centre
|
No concipiracy here. Smid hasn't played much since returning and he needs to play. They are near Stockton so getting him out of the press box and into some games makes sense.
|
|
|
11-25-2015, 07:24 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
I kind of hate that he was sent on a conditioning stint, because now the conditioning stint will be brought up for the next two years as a valid roster move that will solve all our roster problems even though it is seldom ever used.
But, but...conditioning stint?
Sigh.
|
|
|
11-25-2015, 07:28 AM
|
#15
|
#1 Goaltender
|
It should've been done the day he was declared healthy. Would've been better to gauge where his game was at. That or outright waived in favor of a Schlemko, Ryan Wilson, even Diaz as a better option, but it's bad optics to have 3.5 mil sitting in the minors
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
11-25-2015, 07:33 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudfather
Apparently not as Duhatschek was saying on the Fan 960 today that the Flames might ask Ortio to go down to Stockton for a couple of weeks on a conditioning stint - apparently all that is needed is the agreement of the player.
|
Smid seems like a good guy and maybe he would rather play there if he's not going to get in the lineup any time soon.
|
|
|
11-25-2015, 07:36 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias
It should've been done the day he was declared healthy. Would've been better to gauge where his game was at. That or outright waived in favor of a Schlemko, Ryan Wilson, even Diaz as a better option, but it's bad optics to have 3.5 mil sitting in the minors
|
It's not like this is a first for the Flames.
|
|
|
11-25-2015, 07:49 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin
I kind of hate that he was sent on a conditioning stint, because now the conditioning stint will be brought up for the next two years as a valid roster move that will solve all our roster problems even though it is seldom ever used.
But, but...conditioning stint?
Sigh.
|
It doesn't solve any roster problems. He still counts against the 23 man roster and his cap hit still counts in full while he's in Stockton. From the CBA's POV, he's still in the NHL.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-25-2015, 08:14 AM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
It doesn't solve any roster problems. He still counts against the 23 man roster and his cap hit still counts in full while he's in Stockton. From the CBA's POV, he's still in the NHL.
|
I understand that, I just meant others wouldn't know that or forget it and continue to bring it up time after time after time.
|
|
|
11-25-2015, 08:46 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
This also gives the team a chance to see Smid side-by-side with defensemen who should be knocking on the door to take his job. A three game sample size is ultimately meaningless, but I really hope we have at least two guys who look head and shoulders above Smid.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 PM.
|
|