03-17-2015, 11:34 AM
|
#1
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
GMs agree to recommend 3v3 OT & coaches' challenge for goalie interference
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger
Recommendations will be made to introduce coaches challenge and 3 on 3 overtime.
Nick Cotsonika @cotsonika
Chiarelli: NHL will look at either AHL OT or 3-on-3 for five minutes.
Nick Cotsonika @cotsonika
Chiarelli: NHL will look at some type of coach's challenge for goalie interference. Refs would work with hockey ops.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Tablet or monitor to be added for refs for a coaches' challenge-style event with goaltender interference. Lose a timeout if wrong...
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Also, there will discussion about NFL-style setup where in last minute, everything gets reviewed.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Also, refs will have final say on the call.
On 3 v 3, it looks like they are still debating whether to do a 7 minute OT with 4v4 that turns into a 3v3 after a few minutes like the AHL or just a straight 3v3 5 min OT.
Last edited by sureLoss; 03-17-2015 at 11:36 AM.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:37 AM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
|
excellent!
I guess you can close the poll, Bingo!
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:39 AM
|
#3
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Still has to go through NHL BOG and competition committee before the changes happen next season.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
|
yes, but this is the first step in the process
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:41 AM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I like this one.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Also, there will discussion about NFL-style setup where in last minute, everything gets reviewed.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:43 AM
|
#6
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
More on challenge for goaltender interference: can only be used on a goal, can't be used to call a penalty (only goal/no-goal)...
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
And if a coach had no time-outs, can't call for a challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:45 AM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
I want offsides on a goal being a challenge option too. I see too many missed offside calls on good goals.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:45 AM
|
#8
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
I think our current lineup would do VERY well in a 3v3 scenario, with their speed and creativity, there'd be lots of room for them to have some fun.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:45 AM
|
#9
|
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kelowna
Exp: 
|
I would like them to have an icing call waived off on a delayed offside. It would create a lot more offensive chances and see a lot more teams trying to go for the home run pass when a guy is trapped in the offensive zone on an offside.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:45 AM
|
#10
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Not sure about the ref having final say on overturning their own calls.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:46 AM
|
#11
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
@CraigCustance: NHL GMs told salary cap still in $71-72 million range for next season.”
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:48 AM
|
#12
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
More on challenge for goaltender interference: can only be used on a goal, can't be used to call a penalty (only goal/no-goal)....
|
Would love to see it on the penalty side! I think this is where it makes the most sense. goal/no-goal is pretty easily solved with with the technology and review process they have already.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:50 AM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I like the coaches challenge but I would hope it's one a game and like football you lose your time out with a failed challenge. As said above should be applicable to offside and 2-line passes in addition to goaltender interference. I would also consider adding it to challenge dives in the event of phantom high sticks where players snap their heads back.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:50 AM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
@CraigCustance: NHL GMs told salary cap still in $71-72 million range for next season.”
|
This is probably the most significant piece of news but will receive the least discussion.
Who's screwed? I wish Capgeek was still a thing.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:53 AM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
This is probably the most significant piece of news but will receive the least discussion.
Who's screwed? I wish Capgeek was still a thing.
|
Well we know Chicago is screwed, Philly is hurting, Boston too. After that, I dunno
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:54 AM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCallahan
Would love to see it on the penalty side! I think this is where it makes the most sense. goal/no-goal is pretty easily solved with with the technology and review process they have already.
|
The technology is for goal crossing the line/high stick/kick in, not for goalie interference, whcih is what the challenge is about.
I do think they could use it for some other non-subjective penalties like high sticking, too many men, maybe tripping, or offside leading to a goal if the puck never goes back out and back into the zone.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 11:57 AM
|
#17
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
poor David Schlemko, becomes a shootout star the year shootouts are dramatically set to dwindle.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 12:01 PM
|
#18
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Good to hear an update on this.
I think a 5 minute 3 on 3 would work better. It seems like a more concrete rule than 7 minutes split into 4 on 4 and then 3 on 3.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 12:03 PM
|
#19
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
@CraigCustance: NHL GMs told salary cap still in $71-72 million range for next season.”
|
I'm shocked it's not dropping. I guess the Rogers money is offsetting the drop in the Canadian dollar? Any other significant new revenue streams?
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2015, 12:06 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
I'm shocked it's not dropping. I guess the Rogers money is offsetting the drop in the Canadian dollar? Any other significant new revenue streams?
|
More outdoor games! Out door games for everybody!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.
|
|
