ya, that is definitely embarrassing. How can these guys be like that?
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
Is there any reason they can't just call a penalty for diving without calling the embellished infraction? Maybe I haven't paid attention enough but I haven't seen a diving call made without a slash/trip etc.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
The Following User Says Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
Is there any reason they can't just call a penalty for diving without calling the embellished infraction? Maybe I haven't paid attention enough but I haven't seen a diving call made without a slash/trip etc.
Definitely not very common. I think if they want to call both, then the dive needs to be a double minor.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
seriously?? That is a terrible acting on that guy. As soon as he felt a slight touch he went down right away and pretending he is hurt?? He should play soccer instead of hockey. Disgusting!
I can't blame the refs because they can only see so much.
What I blame is the NHL not using video review for every call. The technology has been around for ages now. It just seems like stubbornness and pride that is preventing this problem from really being fixed.
If we switched to the refs on the ice just flagging questionable situations, which were then video reviewed by an off ice ref there would be no more diving problem. The entire incentive for diving would go away because they would get caught every time. With an dedicated off ice ref it should not slow down the game down as it could take place in 20 seconds or so after the on ice refs stopped play. Another benefit would be increasing the consistency of calls.
I can't blame the refs because they can only see so much.
They shouldn't be calling what they don't see.
Quote:
What I blame is the NHL not using video review for every call. The technology has been around for ages now. It just seems like stubbornness and pride that is preventing this problem from really being fixed.
If we switched to the refs on the ice just flagging questionable situations, which were then video reviewed by an off ice ref there would be no more diving problem. The entire incentive for diving would go away because they would get caught every time. With an dedicated off ice ref it should not slow down the game down as it could take place in 20 seconds or so after the on ice refs stopped play. Another benefit would be increasing the consistency of calls.
No thanks. I don't want to spend four hours at the rink. Also, what do you do about non-calls?