Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2014, 02:55 PM   #1
dwd5150
Farm Team Player
 
dwd5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default CBC/Rogers NHL Deal: "CBCmegedon"

Opinionated weblog take on CBC's deal with Rogers for NHL 2014:

http://the-legion-of-decency.blogspo...ive-proof.html

Quote:
320 hours of Prime time programming that won’t earn a dime will be annexed from the CBC schedule to fill the pockets of a major competitor while simultaneously handing over audiences Rogers does not currently reach on its own.

Rogers licensed CBC to continue to broadcast games on Saturday nights (and only Saturday nights) for a term of four years. But even those are not “exclusive” rights.

That means Rogers can place competing games on as many platforms as it damn well pleases on those same Saturday nights.

Meaning, on the positive side, an end to the cross-country belly-aching from markets who don’t see their home team with any regularity because the dog-a$$ Toronto Maple Leafs or more culturally significant Montreal Canadiens have a Saturday night game (which they almost always do) in a larger TV market.

Because Rogers will serve those smaller markets on other channels, in the process significantly depleting the audience which used to belong to the CBC alone.

Or Rogers will pick up the Leafs or Habs or Canucks if those games have more appeal and CBC will get smaller market games.
Full PDF Of CBC documents referenced in the above blog posting:
http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/_file...ith-rogers.pdf


His take as to why Rogers let the CBC continue to produce HNIC for the next several years:

Quote:
How else do you earn back $5.2 Billion?

And how does a cash flush company keep more of it’s cash? By getting the CBC to agree to “providing a production subsidy” and “production resources”.

Yeah, that’s right. In addition to relinquishing airtime to Rogers, you and me will continue to pay for the production of the show. With nobody in management at CBC (who we’re also continuing to pay) having any say over the content or receiving one dime from Rogers to cover the costs of production.
But how do you really feel?
Quote:
It’s over. CBC TV is done. It’s not coming back from this. It simply can’t.

You don’t give up 320 hours of Prime Time and the revenue it earns and stay in the game. Not with the slim profit margins that exist in television these days.
dwd5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dwd5150 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 03:02 PM   #2
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
It’s over. CBC TV is done. It’s not coming back from this. It simply can’t.

You don’t give up 320 hours of Prime Time and the revenue it earns and stay in the game. Not with the slim profit margins that exist in television these days.
Ding Dong the witch is dead
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 03:21 PM   #3
RedCoffee
Scoring Winger
 
RedCoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I heard hockey runs at a loss anyways.

This way CBC gets free advertising on Saturday night for their shows.
RedCoffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 03:22 PM   #4
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

CBC being done isn't the worst thing ever but this deal is kind of a bummer for people like me that want less Rogers involvement in their televised NHL hockey not more.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 03:27 PM   #5
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is all Harper wanting to privatize the CBC.

I'm sure he's trying to do the same thing with the post office (They've nearly doubled their rates)
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 03:34 PM   #6
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
This is all Harper wanting to privatize the CBC.

I'm sure he's trying to do the same thing with the post office (They've nearly doubled their rates)
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 03:38 PM   #7
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

Thanks. I was really wondering why CBC agreed to this deal, there was nothing in it for them. It just seemed like a move to save face by "keeping" HNIC. The only benefit to CBC I can think of is that drunk hockey fans may forget to turn off the TV resulting in increased ratings for their late Saturday/early Sunday programming.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 03:39 PM   #8
cal_guy
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

CBC has actually lost money on HNIC since the last contract renewal. What CBC has been getting from hockey was the ability to promote their programming to the wide audience that hockey brought in. As an example Murdoch Mysteries which previously aired on Roger's City doubled it's audience when moved to CBC.
CBC get's the ability to advertise on Roger's hockey programs at a fraction of the cost before.
cal_guy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 03:41 PM   #9
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I'm one of the few liberals on here. I can have my gripes.

__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 03:44 PM   #10
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Long Live Stephen Harper (and not Glenn Healy)
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 04:13 PM   #11
Teroy
Scoring Winger
 
Teroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler View Post
Long Live Stephen Harper (and not Glenn Healy)
Boooooo!
Teroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 04:14 PM   #12
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

CBC needs to shift focus to more of a BBC style station. BBC is great tv and should be a model for how CBCs programming should be run.
northcrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to northcrunk For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 04:17 PM   #13
Igster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

I don't know...mixed feelings here. End of an era coming. I'll miss CBC for hockey for sure. I say boourns to SN for this.
Igster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 04:18 PM   #14
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk View Post
CBC needs to shift focus to more of a BBC style station. BBC is great tv and should be a model for how CBCs programming should be run.
Do you support Canadian taxpayers giving the CBC per capita funding comparable to what the BBC receives?
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 04:24 PM   #15
Teroy
Scoring Winger
 
Teroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
Do you support Canadian taxpayers giving the CBC per capita funding comparable to what the BBC receives?
At least restore some of the cuts.
Teroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 04:24 PM   #16
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk View Post
CBC needs to shift focus to more of a BBC style station. BBC is great tv and should be a model for how CBCs programming should be run.
The BBC is awesome, but heavily funded by the public. To get the needed funding for its various programs on TV & radio the British public have to pay a TV licence fee. I can't imagine the population of Canada going for that, really.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 04:24 PM   #17
ae118
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Didn't we just have a CBC support/bash thread?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ae118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2014, 04:27 PM   #18
Racki
First Line Centre
 
Racki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

I just hate the Rogers broadcasts. If TSN had orchestrated this gigantic deal and was prepared to bombard us with NHL hockey on their 11 new channels I'd be much more comfortable.
__________________
Racki is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Racki For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 04:31 PM   #19
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
Do you support Canadian taxpayers giving the CBC per capita funding comparable to what the BBC receives?
Yes I would. Canada pays $33 per capita while the UK pays $97 per capita. For the quality difference between the CBC and the BBC it is worth it IMO. Right now the $33 is basicly wasted whereas there are a s^#% ton of great shows on the BBC to watch (although I do stream with vpn, bbc iplayer is sweeeet).

It would be nice to have some Canadian shows that are not absolute crap or boring as hell.

EDIT: Norway pays the most at $180.
northcrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to northcrunk For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2014, 04:35 PM   #20
RedCoffee
Scoring Winger
 
RedCoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
The BBC is awesome, but heavily funded by the public. To get the needed funding for its various programs on TV & radio the British public have to pay a TV licence fee. I can't imagine the population of Canada going for that, really.
The BBC just spent the last 2 weeks showing a bajillion hours of snooker, not sure we would want that.
RedCoffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy