Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Should the Flames re-sign TJ Galiardi
Yes, good fit in the room, bleeds Calgary 29 8.10%
Yes, good energy guy that can push up the roster when needed 58 16.20%
No, too many young players have passed him by. 249 69.55%
No, he'd be too expensive for a fourth line role 22 6.15%
Voters: 358. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2014, 08:34 AM   #1
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default RFA Poll: Should the Flames resign TJ Galiardi

moving on to the RFAs

11 days to the draft!
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 08:37 AM   #2
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Said No, Young guys surpassing him. And they are.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 08:38 AM   #3
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

was a bit disappointed by his play this year, though it could very likely be just an off-year.

I see him as a 3rd/4th line option, but am hoping those positions on the depth chart are being filled by grittier, harder to play against guys, hopefully attained thru trade/FA. I think this will be important given that the top6 aren't going to be all that physical.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 08:40 AM   #4
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

No good. Probably the most disappointing player last season. Didn't show any of the size/tenacity or grit that Feaster preached on about when he was brought over. Certainly didn't look like a player who was proud to play for his home team. On a 27th place team, guys like him are very much expendable. No thanks.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2014, 08:42 AM   #5
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

There should be the option "no, he just isn't that good". I guess the young guys passing him is the nice way of saying that
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2014, 08:56 AM   #6
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

May have had an off year, but regardless, we still have younger options who have played better for his spot.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:02 AM   #7
Point Blank
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Point Blank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

He was awful. It's sad because he was so excited to be in Calgary. Though I suppose having an awful player who wants to be in Calgary is better than an amazing player who hates being in Calgary.
Point Blank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:04 AM   #8
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Yes. No sense letting an asset walk for nothing. He can hold a spot while younger players develop in the AHL and hopefully have a bounce back year and rebuild some value.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:04 AM   #9
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

I said yes, If you can trade Comeau for a 5th, than he is carrying some value. So hold onto him and see what the future brings.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:04 AM   #10
Read Only
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

He brought very little to the team last year and isn't going to be paid enough to help get us to the floor.

No reason that guys like Granlund, Reinhart, Byron shouldn't be playing the minutes he would likely get if re-signed.
Read Only is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Read Only For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2014, 09:05 AM   #11
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The fact that he loves it in Calgary is why I voted yes. Off year last year. Id like to see if he can rebound.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:08 AM   #12
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Yes, and then trade him....or trade his RFA rights.

He's an asset, don't leave him unqualified and let him walk for nothing.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:08 AM   #13
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think he's much better than he showed, however I also believe he's the easiest to replace with homegrown promotions.

I'd like to see Max Reinhart make the team over bringing Galiardi back again.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2014, 09:10 AM   #14
theoforever
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
I think he's much better than he showed, however I also believe he's the easiest to replace with homegrown promotions.

I'd like to see Max Reinhart make the team over bringing Galiardi back again.
Have to agree Galiardi is a good guy but we can use his spot for a young guy. Having said that, if he goes somewhere else he will most likely have a good year. Voted 'No'.
theoforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:17 AM   #15
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

To me he's one of those guys with lots of hustle and zero finish. Prone to bad plays at times also. If the Flames want to draft McDavid he would be a good player to keep and play as he's not very good but if the objective is to improve then move on.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:41 AM   #16
Machiavelli
Franchise Player
 
Machiavelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

He doesn't do anything very well. Pass.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
Machiavelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:53 AM   #17
Drury18
Franchise Player
 
Drury18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

No. He wasn't an asset offensively and he certainly was not an asset off the ice.

Like AC said, rather see the spot go to Max Reinhart myself. Reinhart is probably a better community ambassador for the Flames as well. Both times that I met Galiardi at Flames sponsored events (Fan Fest and another fan event) he was a DB to the extent that Hudler made a comment about TJ's behavior to him. Pre-signed a pile of cards, put them in front of him and pointed to them while looking at his phone as kids walked up asking for an autograph. Rest of the guys at the event were signing them as they kids asked and talking to them. Left a poor impression on me for what was supposed to be a hometown boy living his dream of playing for his hometown team.
Drury18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Drury18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2014, 09:59 AM   #18
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I said no, but it wouldn't be terrible if they brought him back as long as his roster spot isn't guaranteed and they aren't against putting him on waivers and demoting him if someone else impresses in camp.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 09:59 AM   #19
Super-Rye
First Line Centre
 
Super-Rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think the Flames should qualify him. He had flashes of strong play, but was unable to do it with any sort of consistency.

Management has already said they want the kids to spend time in the AHL so I don't see the harm in bringing Galiardi back. Either the kids show the're not ready yet and the Flames have an extra NHL body in Galiardi as a place holder until someone is ready, or, someone like Reinhart shows he is NHL ready and the Flames either have to trade or waive Galiardi.

I just don't see a down side to bringing him back, unless management have someone else in mind.
Super-Rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 10:02 AM   #20
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Replace him with youth. I wanted a local guy to succeed, but he just never did anything but skate.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy