Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2013, 11:20 PM   #1
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Which team killed it at the draft?

Obviously most of us are really happy with how the Flames drafted tonight but there were other teams with multiple picks that fared pretty well also.

Columbus' draft stood out to me as amazing. Buffalo Loaded up on great D prospects and I think even though I hate to say it, the Oilers did well also. Especially in the third round. What are your thoughts?
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:22 PM   #2
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Columbus, Calgary, Edmonton, Buffalo and Vancouver all had a solid one.

San Jose was a head scratcher.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:22 PM   #3
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Buffalo got two really nice d-men in the first and that is enough for a great draft IMO.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:23 PM   #4
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

EDM seemed to walk away with many players that were coveted on CP over the past few months
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:23 PM   #5
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yep, Van getting Horvat sucked for us in a few years time.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:26 PM   #6
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Yep, Van getting Horvat sucked for us in a few years time.
Yeah, but in a few years time they'll still be employing a 38 year old goalie to the tune of $6 million against the cap.....and then for a few more years after that even.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2013, 11:27 PM   #7
JurassicTunga12
Franchise Player
 
JurassicTunga12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Flames, Blue Jackets, Sabres.
JurassicTunga12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:29 PM   #8
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Yeah, but in a few years time they'll still be employing a 38 year old goalie to the tune of $6 million against the cap.....and then for a few more years after that even.
Mwahahaha! Stupid Gillis and his stubborn pride.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:30 PM   #9
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Also, Honorable mention to Dallas. I am going to HATE the fact that Nichushkin is going to be running around with Benn and Eriksson.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2013, 11:40 PM   #10
Jables16
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Jables16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

I think the Flyers did pretty well for themselves. Along with goalies, drafting and developing defensemen has been a glaring weakness for the Flyers. Every blueliner of any consequence in recent memory has been either traded for or pick up as a UFA.

In Samuel Morin they get a huge, physical, mean player with some offensive upside. They also got Robert Hagg in the second round who was projected in a lot of circles to be a first rounder and become a reliable all-around defenseman.

I was certain the Flyers would trade their higher picks for short-term gain but they surprised me and took players they could pay off well in the long run.
__________________
"If the oceans was whiskey and I was a duck, I'd swim to the bottom and never come up, but the oceans ain't whiskey, and I ain't no duck, so I'll play the Jack of Diamonds and toast to my luck..."
Jables16 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jables16 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2013, 11:44 PM   #11
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

I have no idea what they did after, but I'm still jealous of the Avs taking McKinnon.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 11:58 PM   #12
Mattman
First Line Centre
 
Mattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

Vancouver and Blue Jackets
Mattman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 12:23 AM   #13
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
I have no idea what they did after, but I'm still jealous of the Avs taking McKinnon.
Same with Nashville, the consensus number one pick for the better part of this year slid to them in the four hole, and we all know how great Trotz and his staff are at developing defensive prospects. On any other team who knows what might have happened to Jones, but I think he'll be that much better playing on the first pairing with Weber.
trackercowe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 12:42 AM   #14
Jables16
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Jables16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe View Post
Same with Nashville, the consensus number one pick for the better part of this year slid to them in the four hole, and we all know how great Trotz and his staff are at developing defensive prospects. On any other team who knows what might have happened to Jones, but I think he'll be that much better playing on the first pairing with Weber.
If any other team had drafted Jones at 4 I would agree, but I think Nashville could have used MacKinnon or Barkov badly. Although they could trade Weber for a very good return of forwards and start building around their other impressive young defensemen.
__________________
"If the oceans was whiskey and I was a duck, I'd swim to the bottom and never come up, but the oceans ain't whiskey, and I ain't no duck, so I'll play the Jack of Diamonds and toast to my luck..."
Jables16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 12:46 AM   #15
jeffman
Powerplay Quarterback
 
jeffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Nashville Calgary Vancouver CBJ
jeffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 01:16 AM   #16
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Winners:

- Buffalo, nice pair of defensemen
- Detroit, traded down and still got a 50-goal man. Mantha could've easily been the BPA at 18.
- Tampa, didn't get distracted by Jones and got a lethal partner for Stamkos in Drouin. Erne was a nice value pick too.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 01:20 AM   #17
foshizzle11
#1 Goaltender
 
foshizzle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Calgary. Two great picks for 22 and 28th but love the 6th. No one can complain about the pick.
foshizzle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 02:13 AM   #18
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

http://insider.espn.go.com/nhl/story...-get-top-marks

BUF/DAL/CLB A+

Calgary was with the 1-4 teams as an A

Quote:
After dismantling their team ahead of the trade deadline, Calgary needed to hit with their three first-round picks, and I think they did. The Flames needed size and got a big center in Sean Monahan, who has the upside to play in the top-six with high-end skill. Emile Poirier adds grit and speed -- with a knack for scoring big goals -- while displaying a great second effort in all three zones. Morgan Klimchuk is a two-way, hard-working forward who scored in junior, but he's my question mark among the Flames' top three picks and the reason I held back from giving them an A+. If he matures and adds strength, he has a chance to be a depth forward with upside as a third liner. I just think other players on the board had more to offer at No. 28, but Klimchuk does fill a need. Third-rounder Keegan Kanzig is 6-foot-7 and 245 pounds. If he plays that will be an added bonus. Like I said earlier, size was an obvious need and it was addressed.
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to d_phaneuf For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2013, 02:16 AM   #19
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/blog/ey...d-pick-in-2013

compared to above just shows how vastly different one opinion can be from another in the draft

the ESPN grade has Klimchuk the question mark and Poirier the solid pick

the CBS one gives the Klimchuk pick a B and Poirier a D+
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 06:57 AM   #20
you got PHANUEFED
Powerplay Quarterback
 
you got PHANUEFED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

CBJ, Buff, Oilers, Flames all did well at the draft. Next year should be no different only difference we will be picking closer to 1st over all.
you got PHANUEFED is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy