Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2013, 11:03 PM   #1
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default Can the Flames go the whole 48 game season without a Fighting Major?

Only NHL team currently without a Fight Major.

Detroit (historical pacifist) has 4!! nobody but the Flames without at least 2 fighting majors.

Last in League in Hits...
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2013, 11:06 PM   #2
Traditional_Ale
Franchise Player
 
Traditional_Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Fighting for the most part I think is stupid. When two guys not known to fight come up out of the corner or whatever embroiled in the heat of the moment and start swinging it is really awesome. But other than that...meh.
__________________

So far, this is the oldest I've been.
Traditional_Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Traditional_Ale For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2013, 11:07 PM   #3
bugsy
Scoring Winger
 
bugsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: nz
Exp:
Default

Yeah bit early to take alot of stock out of that, but lack of physicality and nastiness notable for sure.
bugsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 11:35 PM   #4
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

the Flames are weak in corners. Rarely do they even body anyone as a team and are allowing their goalie to knocked around.

2013 Flames are High on the physical suckage meter.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 11:41 PM   #5
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

I don't much about fights, but we are extremely weak physically.

While watching the game tonight, I was thinking about who actually throws lots of hits on this team and Sarich is the only player I could think of.
A gritty agitator who throws the body around a lot would be great for this team.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 11:43 PM   #6
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

It used to be a sense of pride that the Flames were at least a tough team.
This has been embarressing no fights, and very little hitting even.
Scums after whistles are not even occurring.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
Old 02-01-2013, 09:00 AM   #7
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

It's probably for the best no one fights. Dont' want another ''Ivanans'' incident on our hands.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
Old 02-01-2013, 09:11 AM   #8
Derek Sutton
First Line Centre
 
Derek Sutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
Exp:
Default

How about a good hit? has anyone rocked anyone good this year? The players are so uniterested out there it is pathetic. Lazy players making lazy plays, playing like they don't care, not willing to engage. Of course no one is going to fight. Also probably the least physical team in the league, mainly because they can't keep up skating wise with most of their competition. This is not a good mix for winning or for entertainment.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
Derek Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:16 AM   #9
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Flames are soft this year, people should probably get used to this new softer style of play.

Honestly I don't think we need a thread after each loss stating how the Flames are soft? I'm sure this could have fit in the two other threads you made.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:16 AM   #10
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I'm glad the Flames don't have any real useless enforcer types.

I agree we don't have enough overall toughness though. What this team needs is a Lucic/Clowe/Hartnell type winger. A guy that has that size/toughness factor but can still fit into a skill game as well.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:17 AM   #11
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

The Flames have no swagger. They need physical guys, and a guy that can play and will drop the mitts (and be a bit more successful than Jackman) goes a long way towards that. This team is just too weak physically.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:30 AM   #12
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

The Flames have become an incredibly easy team to play against.

They have morphed into Hockey's version of the harlem globe trotters. Interesting to watch but not anywhere close to being able to compete with an NBA team.

When the Flames were forced to sign Begin it was an admission by Feaster/Hartley that they were not ready to compete at the NHL level.

Once the Flames get tired of fancy passing any other team can knock them over and drive towards the Flames net.

Despite the high light reels on sports centre 80% of NHL goals are based on fighting for space , deflections and winning physical battles in the area in front of the goal...... ie hard work rather than skill.

The Flames have far more skill than they have had in at least the last 10 years.... Hudler, Backlund Cervenka added to Tanguay and Cammalleri Stajan and I now have to admit it softer Iginla as softer skilled forwards leaves Glencross, Jackman and Begin to provide ALL the grit.

Wideman is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more skilled than Hannan who he replaces

Sarich is mentioned as being the Flames physical force on defence...... 2013 Sarich is not..... He is slow and non-aggressive. He joins Bouwmeester and Brodie and Smith and Butler, Gio and Wideman as total non-aggressive d-man.

The total of all Flames d-men have 19 hits in 5 games!!!!

For comparison Emelmin has 32 hits in 6 games. There are 13 individual defencemen that have as many or more hits as the whole Flame defence.!!!!!


Thank goodness this team will not be in the playoffs because in a seven game series when the other team wanted to impose their will on the Flames it would be a massacre.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:46 AM   #13
badger89
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

No. Iggy will lose it on someone at some point. /thread
badger89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:47 AM   #14
Puppet Guy
Franchise Player
 
Puppet Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the dark side of Sesame Street
Exp:
Default

I hope not.
__________________
"If Javex is your muse…then dive in buddy"

- Surferguy
Puppet Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:49 AM   #15
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
The Flames are soft this year, people should probably get used to this new softer style of play.

Honestly I don't think we need a thread after each loss stating how the Flames are soft? I'm sure this could have fit in the two other threads you made.
Just like they have gotten used to missing the playoffs?

As to you not liking my threads...... It was clearly labelled as a thread to discuss how soft the Flames were and my name was there as the OP... so you knew what this was about and you not only looked in on the thread but you took the time and effort to make a post.

There are a bunch of fan boys on CP who believe that all things are good because these after all are the Calgary Flames. They can post how great the Flames and how much improved they are and how they are all great players..... They are quick to "win" any discussion by calling non-fan boys out as Trolls and Haters.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 09:49 AM   #16
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

There will be fights. I really don't care at all though. The last thing the flames need is to give the oposing team a chance at a PP. Flames PK is god awful.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 10:21 AM   #17
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Just like they have gotten used to missing the playoffs?

As to you not liking my threads...... It was clearly labelled as a thread to discuss how soft the Flames were and my name was there as the OP... so you knew what this was about and you not only looked in on the thread but you took the time and effort to make a post.

There are a bunch of fan boys on CP who believe that all things are good because these after all are the Calgary Flames. They can post how great the Flames and how much improved they are and how they are all great players..... They are quick to "win" any discussion by calling non-fan boys out as Trolls and Haters.
I agree with you and have since the offseason. We were bothing stating that this team was too soft.

Just don't think we need an identical thread to the one about keeping Kipper safe, technically that was the exact same discussion and was still on the first page.

If we make a new thread after every game the Flames play soft this season their will be 48 threads about how the Flames are a soft team.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 10:26 AM   #18
kirant
Franchise Player
 
kirant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

I couldn't care less about whether or not the Flames engage in a fight again. Most fights are for really dumb reasons these days.

What I wouldn't mind seeing is the Flames develop a team that can be both skilled and physical. They used to hold the former in spades as a blue collar hard working team, but now have gone to the polar opposite. The amount of grit isn't there and the Flames struggle to break out of their zone against teams with aggressive forechecking or when they are pinned on the boards.
__________________
kirant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 10:30 AM   #19
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I have a feeling there's gonna be a beat down this Saturday...
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 10:41 AM   #20
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

i dono't think fight's would have changed any outcome of the game.

if you bring up hits (which are unreliable stats due to their subjectivity anyways), sure, one could make the argument that the flames are physical enough. However, i don't know if that's caused losses in itself either.

Watching hudler/cervanka/stajan play and be successful, it isn't about overpowering physicality, it is smart-quick puck pressure/pursuit on the forecheck.

Outside of the periods the flames failed to even show up this season, i haven't seen the team being pullied or rag dolled every shift. of course the periods where they didn't show up, they were rag dolled all over the place.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy