Another case for Darwin

[undercoverbrother]

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11...umcision-case/

The Supreme Court of Canada will hear on Friday the dramatic case of a B.C. father who, for religious reasons, tried to circumcise his four-year-old son on his kitchen floor with a carpet blade and a blood coagulant meant for horses.

[GoinAllTheWay]

Holy s**t! That's cringe worthy...poor little #######. Carpet blade? Really?

[Reaper]

This has nothing to do with Darwin. The guy didn't circumcise himself. He disfigured his child.

[Ozy_Flame]

I hovered my mouse over the thread title. I saw "circumcision case" and I can already see without reading any of the article that a Darwin award is clearly in play.

[Northendzone]

i would say that this guy should throw any mugs or t-shirts that proclaim him to be worlds greatest dad or #1 dad........yikes!!!

[VladtheImpaler]

If I read the whole article, will it explain to me what "religious reasons"compelled him to do it in the kitchen, as opposed to having a doctor or a mohel do it?

[Daradon]

So why not have him circumcised in the hospital then? I can't imagine a religious ceremony that takes place at 4 years of age on the kitchen floor.

[Reaper]

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

I hovered my mouse over the thread title. I saw "circumcision case" and I can already see without reading any of the article that a Darwin award is clearly in play.

It wouldn't be a Darwin Award! He did it to someone else!

[Reaper]

Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler

If I read the whole article, will it explain to me what "religious reasons"compelled him to do it in the kitchen, as opposed to having a doctor or a mohel do it?

Yes, it does explain. The boy would have required general anesthetic and physicians deemed him too young for it.

[Super Nintendo Chalmers]

Originally Posted by Reaper

It wouldn't be a Darwin Award! He did it to someone else!

Potentially, it could be. He ensured his offspring can't reproduce.