Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-26-2012, 01:19 PM   #1
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default Tougher immigration measures for newlyweds introduced

Glad to see this. Its about time the government started to make it more difficult to perpetrate immigration fraud. Way too many illegal aliens in this country to begin with (which we probably can't do much about) but this at least is a step in the right direction. Hats off to every immigrant who came to Canada the right way.... right way meaning they followed the rules.

Quote:
Childless men and women sponsored for Canadian citizens they wed must live together for two years under new regulations targeting widespread marriage fraud.

"There are countless cases of marriage fraud across the country," Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney told reporters Friday at a hotel near Pearson airport, one day after the new regulation was enacted.
Quote:
The two-year Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations amendments that began Thursday start the day a newcomer receives permanent resident status in Canada - which would be revoked if a couple splits or never lives together, Kenney said, adding that exemptions would be considered by officials in cases involving proven abuse by the sponsor or a relative, neglect or the sponsor's death.

The amendments, which he said are similar to those already in place in Australia, the U.S. and UK, were enacted five months after the Canadian government introduced a measure that prohibits sponsored spouses from sponsoring a new spouse for five years after they become a permanent resident.
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/10/26...eds-introduced
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:21 PM   #2
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
Glad to see this. Its about time the government started to make it more difficult to perpetrate immigration fraud. Way too many illegal aliens in this country to begin with (which we probably can't do much about) but this at least is a step in the right direction. Hats off to every immigrant who came to Canada the right way.... right way meaning they followed the rules.
Really?

How many is too many? I have never hear of any data that supported any statistically significant portion of the immigrant population being illegal.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Rathji For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 01:22 PM   #3
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

There was some poor bugger in the news last week who had married a Russian woman, she dumped him as soon as she got her residency and went on welfare. Since he is her sponsor he has to pay for her welfare for 3 years. Clearly this needed to be fixed.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:22 PM   #4
HELPNEEDED
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cool Ville
Exp:
Default

Rerun, you're all over the immigrantion/language issue eh. Hopefully you have the correct papers for your dog, don't want him deported from Ranchmans.
HELPNEEDED is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HELPNEEDED For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 01:23 PM   #5
HELPNEEDED
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cool Ville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
There was some poor bugger in the news last week who had married a Russian woman, she dumped him as soon as she got her residency and went on welfare. Since he is her sponsor he has to pay for her welfare for 3 years. Clearly this needed to be fixed.
really?
HELPNEEDED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:25 PM   #6
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...riagebill.html

Quote:
The first bill he received was for $24,899.34. He paid an initial lump sum, but still owes almost $17,000. He lives on a monthly pension income of $1,600 and owns a home.
“The warning was — if I don’t pay — they will go after my property,” said Munz, who is now making monthly payments of $500. "I was scared they would go after my property."
Under federal rules, any Canadian who marries and sponsors a foreigner is legally responsible for supporting them for three years after their spouse gets permanent residency.
If they collect social assistance in that period, the sponsor must pay it back, even if they get divorced in the interim.
“I've been stuck with that,” said Munz. “But then, how come they cannot take her permanent citizen status away?”
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jacks For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 01:29 PM   #7
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

If you are stupid enough to believe your Russian mail order bride "loves" you . . .
troutman is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 01:33 PM   #8
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Sneaky f'n Russians...
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 01:47 PM   #9
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
If you are stupid enough to believe your Russian mail order bride "loves" you . . .
I guess so.

Keep in mind she is 72 years old, it's not like she's a 20 year old stripper. I think it would be reasonable to think she might want a husband. Regardless, her residency should have been revoked since she obviously was just using the guy to get in the country.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:58 PM   #10
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
Really?

How many is too many? I have never hear of any data that supported any statistically significant portion of the immigrant population being illegal.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/...w.html?cmp=rss

Quote:
It's hard to put numbers on the trade in illegal immigrants to Canada, but the RCMP says that between 1997 and 2002, smugglers assisted about 12 per cent of the 14,792 improperly documented migrants who were intercepted in Canada or en route to the country.

I would say that almost 15,000 illegal immigrants arriving into Canada in a 5 year period is a significant number of people.


Quote:
There is no credible information available on unathorized immigration in Canada. Estimates range between 35,000 and 120,000 unauthorized immigrants in Canada.[57] James Bissett, a former head of the Canadian Immigration Service, has suggested that the lack of any credible refugee screening process, combined with a high likelihood of ignoring any deportation orders, has resulted in tens of thousands of outstanding warrants for the arrest of rejected refugee claimants, with little attempt at enforcement.[58] Refugee claimants in Canada do not have to attempt re-entry to learn the status of their claim. A 2008 report by the Auditor General Sheila Fraser stated that Canada has lost track of as many as 41,000 illegal immigrants.[59][60] This number was predicted to increase drastically with the expiration of temporary employer work permits issued in 2007 and 2008, which were not renewed in many cases because of the shortage of work due to the recession.[61]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration

Last edited by Rerun; 10-26-2012 at 02:07 PM.
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:06 PM   #11
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/...w.html?cmp=rss



I would say that almost 15,000 illegal immigrants arriving into Canada in a 5 year period is a significant number of people.
I would say you have an incredibly warped view of global illegal immigration. 15,000 is nothing.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 02:09 PM   #12
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I would say you have an incredibly warped view of global illegal immigration. 15,000 is nothing.
15,000 over a 5 year period, is a lot IMO. 1 is too many.
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:11 PM   #13
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

God damn Mexicans! Border jumping and . . . wait, what country is this?
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:16 PM   #14
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
Really?

How many is too many? I have never hear of any data that supported any statistically significant portion of the immigrant population being illegal.
I stated my opinion on the changes being made... what's your opinion? For or against?
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:17 PM   #15
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
15,000 over a 5 year period, is a lot IMO. 1 is too many.
lol, this reminds me of rebublicans in the states trying to make a big deal out of voter fraud.

3000 people a year is nothing.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 02:24 PM   #16
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin View Post
lol, this reminds me of rebublicans in the states trying to make a big deal out of voter fraud.

3000 people a year is nothing.
Thats 3000 per year of "documented" cases. How many more undocumented cases are there?

Nothing at all wrong with tightening up our immigration regulations. I just fail to understand the ambivalent attitude towards cheaters, on here.... as if its ok and just the cost of doing business.
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rerun For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 02:28 PM   #17
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
I guess so.

Keep in mind she is 72 years old, it's not like she's a 20 year old stripper. I think it would be reasonable to think she might want a husband. Regardless, her residency should have been revoked since she obviously was just using the guy to get in the country.
This makes him even more stupid, if you are going to get screwed over at least it should be buy a 20 year old stripper, that you can boast about.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 02:42 PM   #18
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
15,000 over a 5 year period, is a lot IMO. 1 is too many.
Please tell me you have an idiotic 'they tuk r jubs' argument behind this. Please!!!
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:45 PM   #19
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
I stated my opinion on the changes being made... what's your opinion? For or against?
I don't mind the changes, but I do think that making a big deal out of, or putting significant additional resources into fighting illegal immigration into Canada is a bit foolish.

Of those 15,000 documented illegal immigrants that you mention, how many are from these types of marriages?
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rathji For This Useful Post:
Old 10-26-2012, 03:03 PM   #20
FlamingLonghorn
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
15,000 over a 5 year period, is a lot IMO. 1 is too many.
Lol... The US gets roughly 1.5 million over a 5 year period. Insignificant number is insignificant.
FlamingLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamingLonghorn For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy