Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2012, 04:42 PM   #1
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default Alberta looking at ways to expand natural gas use, including in vehicles

Quote:
CALGARY • Alberta’s premier says the province is looking at ways to boost the use of natural gas, including using it as a transportation fuel, at a time when dismal prices have been pinching producers as well as government coffers.

“This is part of the direction we need to go in, because the circumstances have changed to the point where these decisions, that can be made on behalf of government, start to make economic sense — for us and for industry,” Alison Redford told a conference on unconventional natural gas Tuesday.

Ms. Redford concedes there are barriers to the idea, including the great expense of building refuelling infrastructure and the high purchase price of vehicles that can run on natural gas.
http://business.financialpost.com/20...__lsa=cde5d489

Why not? Cheap enough, with huge reserves all over North America.

Cleaner than 'oil' too.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 04:53 PM   #2
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

ok, call me stupid, but wouldn't that be pretty dangerous if the fueld tank fractures?
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 04:55 PM   #3
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

I still think NG vehicles are silly.

Take the emissions away from the population to the power plants. Just build some monster NG power plants and use electric cars. Better performance, better range, less maintenance, no new fueling infrastructure required.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 04:56 PM   #4
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

I dunno, how about using natural gas instead of coal for electricity generation? How about that one?
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Reaper For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2012, 05:02 PM   #5
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Not sure pumping gas's tires is such a good idea for Alberta if it would be at the expense of oil.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:10 PM   #6
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
I still think NG vehicles are silly.

Take the emissions away from the population to the power plants. Just build some monster NG power plants and use electric cars. Better performance, better range, less maintenance, no new fueling infrastructure required.

What about the issues around battery disposal for electric cars. The environmental issues around the manufacture of the car. The relatively short life of the batteries and the cost of replacement.

I'm not pooping on the electric car but isn't the overall emmissions of the whole lifecycle similar to the standard car, but the cost of keeping one on the road much greater?

I would think that it would be just as prudent to continue to improve engine efficiencies and burning technology on standard vehicles?
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:24 PM   #7
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Sounds great until nat gas goes back up to $6. Remember when everyone wanted to convert their car to propane in the 80''s & 90's?
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:27 PM   #8
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
Sounds great until nat gas goes back up to $6. Remember when everyone wanted to convert their car to propane in the 80''s & 90's?
Considering propane is a byproduct and natural gas is not, I would venture to guess that the cost isn't comparable.

Also, there are HUGE natural gas reserves all over the world. Nevermind the recent developments with shale.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:28 PM   #9
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper View Post
I dunno, how about using natural gas instead of coal for electricity generation? How about that one?
On a side by side basis, I can't imagine why anyone wouldn't want to replace all the coal fired power plants in the world with natural gas plants instead.

45% less emissions.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:31 PM   #10
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

A big issue with electric cars is the charge time. AFAIK you have to either swap batteries or leave them idle while it charges.

For Natural gas I can see the province starting with an incentive for cities to switch their fleets over. I am sure that Calgary spends millions on gas and diesel for their buses and maintenance vehicles.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:31 PM   #11
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Not sure pumping gas's tires is such a good idea for Alberta if it would be at the expense of oil.
Why not?
__________________
REDVAN!
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:33 PM   #12
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Coal is still around because it is incredibly cheap. I don't remember the numbers but I think coal comes in at less than half the cost of NG for electricity generation. Of course coal has environmental issues but at the moment coal is cheap and they don't have to factor in the cost to the environment.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:35 PM   #13
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

In many parts of Australia the city buses are powered by Natural Gas. I'm guessing that they're used in parts of Europe also.
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:43 PM   #14
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
On a side by side basis, I can't imagine why anyone wouldn't want to replace all the coal fired power plants in the world with natural gas plants instead.

45% less emissions.
You also have to compare gas to retrofitting the coal plants with CO2 scrubbers.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:44 PM   #15
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDVAN View Post
Why not?
Because our competitive advantage in oil is (I think) bigger than our competitive advantage in gas.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:48 PM   #16
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
What about the issues around battery disposal for electric cars. The environmental issues around the manufacture of the car. The relatively short life of the batteries and the cost of replacement.
You are making a lot of assumptions. What makes you think the battery packs have a short life? So far that has proven not to be the case in a hybrid. As for the cost of replacement, what about the cost to replace your engine, or transmission, or any of the numerous emissions control components. Or the exhaust system. An electric car has far less components that are prone to failure. As far as battery disposal, they are not tossed away they are recycled, same as just about every other component that goes into a car. Actually a battery is easier to recycle than some other parts of the car, for example the electronics contain a bewildering array of compounds.
Quote:
I'm not pooping on the electric car but isn't the overall emmissions of the whole lifecycle similar to the standard car, but the cost of keeping one on the road much greater?
I don't think there is enough data to say. But a pure electric car has the potential to be extremely reliable, and have far less maintenance. The fact that you don't have any combustion taking place GREATLY simplifies and extends the life of all the components involved. Look at any modern engine bay, the sheer number of systems designed to deal with the fuel, combustion and resulting emissions is substantial to say the least.
Quote:
I would think that it would be just as prudent to continue to improve engine efficiencies and burning technology on standard vehicles?
The thermal efficiency of the internal combustion engine is about as good as it gets.

As for natural gas, IMO the best way to utilize it is to generate electricity, and use it to charge electric powered cars. It's not a perfect system, but given our current infrastructure about as good as we can do.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 05:56 PM   #17
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Considering propane is a byproduct and natural gas is not, I would venture to guess that the cost isn't comparable.
I wasn't trying to directly compare propane and natural gas. At the time propane was cheap and gas was expensive. People paid lots of money to have vehicles converted and gas stations began installing the infrastructure to service those vehicles. Then the price of propane went up and gas came down leaving a bunch of vehicles that nobody wanted. Now you have to look around to find a gas station that will fill a propane vehicle, just guessing maybe 1 in 30?

Also I'm not an expert by any means but you can't directly compare the two anyway. The same volume of propane will create a lot more energy than natural gas. I'm sure someone more knowledgeable will elaborate.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 06:22 PM   #18
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

The historical challenge with propane and Natural gas was that you had to get the tanks re-tested every five years.... at a cost of $3000 - $4000. This seems to negate the savings. Furthermore the LPG industry kept raising the safety/redunancy bar so it became harder and costlier to get the vehicle's propane system serviced (many tech got frustrated with the regs and let their LPG tickets lapse).

I am told that the new generation of CNG tanks won't need re-testing. But I will bet that CNG will start off as "worry-free" and every few years there will be additional stipulations and regulations... stuff that makes maintaining your vehicle a real pain in the neck.

BTW I understand the majority of Southern California's transit service is via CNG powered buses (initiated by California emissions regulations)
para transit fellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 08:08 PM   #19
EVERLAST
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

and it begins
EVERLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 08:17 PM   #20
nickerjones
Franchise Player
 
nickerjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma - Where they call a puck a ball...
Exp:
Default

Cmon , Oklahoma needs a bailout.. We got all the Natural gas ya'll need !!! Lets do this... so I can go back to work ; )
__________________
Beer League Players Association - Home of the adult "athlete"
nickerjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy