Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2005, 07:46 AM   #1
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

All I can say is FINALLY!

Expected to take three years, the city's Crowchild project will see that road widened to six lanes, with interchanges at Nose Hill Dr. and Sarcee Tr. N.W., while the LRT will be extended to Crowfoot Centre, at Nose Hill Dr. N.W.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 08:05 AM   #2
@theCBE
Powerplay Quarterback
 
@theCBE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

wow.. thats huge... the interchanges at nosehill/sarcee and crowhchild are going to make crowchild run way smoother too
@theCBE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 08:16 AM   #3
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Gee, I'm glad they finally decided to extend the LRT to Crowchild (Something that any rational person could see was needed/inevitable when they extended it to Dalhousie). Oh well, at least it's getting done now, though I'm still a little p*ssed at the time/money wasted in doing the expansion in 2 parts.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 08:28 AM   #4
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Having previously lived in that area for 20 years, it's a desperately needed change.

Still it's a joke, because all that free flowing traffic across 6 lanes is suddenly bottlenecked at McMahon to Kensington. Both lights and 4 lanes are the culprit here. WHen they shut that bridge just after 16th they really should have made it 6 lanes. Yet another shining example of City planning.
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 09:09 AM   #5
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by I-Hate-Hulse@Apr 26 2005, 08:28 AM
Having previously lived in that area for 20 years, it's a desperately needed change.

Still it's a joke, because all that free flowing traffic across 6 lanes is suddenly bottlenecked at McMahon to Kensington. Both lights and 4 lanes are the culprit here. WHen they shut that bridge just after 16th they really should have made it 6 lanes. Yet another shining example of City planning.
Agreed. It baffles me how the part of the north arm of Crowchild closest to the city centre is the least developed.

Nosehill/Sarcee are badly needed, but now those of us that need to go past stony trail will probably see a line up there, but thats what we get for moving out so far. It should still be WAY better.

Nothing could be worse than Stoney trail on a Saturday afternoon... 3 lights to get through the intersection!?!? I think some re-programming is needed.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 09:15 AM   #6
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Hulk, I hate hulse the thing that really baffles me is why the NW is only getting 2 LRT Stations and they built 4 in the south.

IMO, they could use one at Northland as well.

The Dalhousie - Brentwood run is quite a long one.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 09:27 AM   #7
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by the_only_turek_fan@Apr 26 2005, 08:15 AM
Hulk, I hate hulse the thing that really baffles me is why the NW is only getting 2 LRT Stations and they built 4 in the south.

IMO, they could use one at Northland as well.

The Dalhousie - Brentwood run is quite a long one.
Part of the issue with building lrt stations in the NW is physical space required for a station and parking facilities.

That kind of space existed in the deep south while in the NW each station would have to be shoehorned into the median of Crowchild Trail.

The final three stops on the lrt line in the deep south also have no parkades like what will be required for the final three stops on the NW end of the lrt line. Parkades cost way more money to build than parking lots.

It's not just the cost of the line that comes into consideration when budgeting for stations, it's the cost of the station itself.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 09:43 AM   #8
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Reaper@Apr 26 2005, 09:27 AM
Part of the issue with building lrt stations in the NW is physical space required for a station and parking facilities.

That kind of space existed in the deep south while in the NW each station would have to be shoehorned into the median of Crowchild Trail.

The final three stops on the lrt line in the deep south also have no parkades like what will be required for the final three stops on the NW end of the lrt line. Parkades cost way more money to build than parking lots.

It's not just the cost of the line that comes into consideration when budgeting for stations, it's the cost of the station itself.
You reminded me of something I wanted to mention.

Dalhousie is usually full before 7am from what I hear, and there is even less room to park at crowfoot, infact, almost none. Its going to take some kind of fancy shmancy parking structure to fill the needs of that station.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 10:07 AM   #9
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

If you haven't noticed, construction on the Crowchild/Sarcee interchange has already begun. The detour at that location should be operational on May 15. Also, the widening started last year. Crowchild/Nose Hill interchange will be built next year, I believe. Good for me, I'm designing all of the electrical/street lighting on that monster project.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 10:16 AM   #10
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

I'm not with Stantec anymore. I left that place almost a year ago.

It's a good place to start, but a great place to leave.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:01 AM   #11
JohnnyO
Scoring Winger
 
JohnnyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Anyone living West of Nosehill, Cochrane and Bearspaw be prepared for some serious potential Road rage in the next couple of years. Major Construction on Stoney and Crowchild. Once its done it will be great but super annoying until then. Plus you will still have a delay getting in and out of downtown.

Whoever planned to have traffic stop for the C train at 4,5,6 Ave at 10/9 street is not much brighter then the dude who designed the Breisbois/Crow interchange.
JohnnyO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:22 AM   #12
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JohnnyO@Apr 26 2005, 11:01 AM
not much brighter then the dude who designed the Breisbois/Crow interchange.
I hear this one a lot from my friends, but personally the interchange doesn't bother me that much. I recognize that space was limited there and that short of cutting off traffic from Northland & Brisebois onto Crowchild, there's not a whole lot that could be done.

I've also heard lots of griping about the new "split diamond" (vs a cloverleaf) that's in favor with designers now. Most people don't like the 2 sets of lights they have to navigate through. I seem to recall reading that the split diamond is more efficient during high volume situations.
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:24 AM   #13
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hulkrogan+Apr 26 2005, 09:43 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hulkrogan @ Apr 26 2005, 09:43 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Reaper@Apr 26 2005, 09:27 AM
Part of the issue with building lrt stations in the NW is physical space required for a station and parking facilities.

That kind of space existed in the deep south while in the NW each station would have to be shoehorned into the median of Crowchild Trail.

The final three stops on the lrt line in the deep south also have no parkades like what will be required for the final three stops on the NW end of the lrt line. Parkades cost way more money to build than parking lots.

It's not just the cost of the line that comes into consideration when budgeting for stations, it's the cost of the station itself.
You reminded me of something I wanted to mention.

Dalhousie is usually full before 7am from what I hear, and there is even less room to park at crowfoot, infact, almost none. Its going to take some kind of fancy shmancy parking structure to fill the needs of that station. [/b][/quote]
Thats about the same time I take the train.

And you are correct it does get packed.

I expect a lot of the feeder buses from Hawkwood, Arbour Lake, Scenic Acres, Silver Springs etc. to go to Crowfoot now.

I wonder how full the train will be when it does get down to Dalhousie?
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:29 AM   #14
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

The split diamond is definitely more efficient as far as space goes. It takes far less space than a cloverleaf, so if space is tight that's definitely the way they're going to go. I know that the Stoney/Hwy 1 interchange is going to be a big cloverleaf, but not too many of them are these days. Crow/Sarcee is going to be kind of a hybrid. It's the split diamond except for the people exiting southbound Sarcee onto eastbound Crow, where there's a cloverleaf.

I'm not sure what the interchange at Glenmore/5 St is going to look like, but if you want to talk about frustrating traffic, just imagine trying to drive through there in rush hour while construction is going on. That's going to be an absolute nightmare.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:34 AM   #15
JohnnyO
Scoring Winger
 
JohnnyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by I-Hate-Hulse+Apr 26 2005, 11:22 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (I-Hate-Hulse @ Apr 26 2005, 11:22 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-JohnnyO@Apr 26 2005, 11:01 AM
not much brighter then the dude who designed the Breisbois/Crow interchange.
I hear this one a lot from my friends, but personally the interchange doesn't bother me that much. I recognize that space was limited there and that short of cutting off traffic from Northland & Brisebois onto Crowchild, there's not a whole lot that could be done.
[/b][/quote]
The only problem I have with the Bresbois/Crow Interchange is that you cant go from Brentwood mall or the University to Northland without using Northmount or going around from Shaganappi.
JohnnyO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:38 AM   #16
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JohnnyO@Apr 26 2005, 05:01 PM
Anyone living West of Nosehill, Cochrane and Bearspaw be prepared for some serious potential Road rage in the next couple of years. Major Construction on Stoney and Crowchild. Once its done it will be great but super annoying until then. Plus you will still have a delay getting in and out of downtown.

Whoever planned to have traffic stop for the C train at 4,5,6 Ave at 10/9 street is not much brighter then the dude who designed the Breisbois/Crow interchange.
what is wrong with the Brisebois/Crowchild interchange? i find it pretty good. It way better than what they had before the C-train extension. It was hell turning left into brisebois.
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:57 AM   #17
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fotze+Apr 26 2005, 07:29 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (fotze @ Apr 26 2005, 07:29 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-I-Hate-Hulse@Apr 26 2005, 08:28 AM
Having previously lived in that area for 20 years, it's a desperately needed change.

Still it's a joke, because all that free flowing traffic across 6 lanes is suddenly bottlenecked at McMahon to Kensington. Both lights and 4 lanes are the culprit here. WHen they shut that bridge just after 16th they really should have made it 6 lanes. Yet another shining example of City planning.
They just need to eliminate all the inner city neighborhoods and make them into 10 lane arteries into the core along with massive parking lots. [/b][/quote]
Finally, some sense on the board
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 12:09 PM   #18
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JohnnyO@Apr 26 2005, 10:01 AM
Whoever planned to have traffic stop for the C train at 4,5,6 Ave at 10/9 street is not much brighter then the dude who designed the Breisbois/Crow interchange.
Well, the only way to have the C Train run through downtown is to have it above ground so the only way to have it work is to sync traffic lights.

The reason why traffic yields to the C Train during rush hour is to keep the train on time. Why should people who drive downtown (causing rush hour congestion in the first place) get preferential treatment over those who commute by transit?

There was a failed project where the C Train was to run underground along Bow Trail but there were too many flooding concerns due to our crazy weather. You can see where the inlet to the Bow Trail tunnel from inside the Dalhousie/Somerset tunnel immediately south of the downtown core on the west side of said tunnel.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 12:31 PM   #19
JohnnyO
Scoring Winger
 
JohnnyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Reaper+Apr 26 2005, 12:09 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Reaper @ Apr 26 2005, 12:09 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-JohnnyO@Apr 26 2005, 10:01 AM
Whoever planned to have traffic stop for the C train at 4,5,6 Ave at 10/9 street is not much brighter then the dude who designed the Breisbois/Crow interchange.
Well, the only way to have the C Train run through downtown is to have it above ground so the only way to have it work is to sync traffic lights.

The reason why traffic yields to the C Train during rush hour is to keep the train on time. Why should people who drive downtown (causing rush hour congestion in the first place) get preferential treatment over those who commute by transit?

There was a failed project where the C Train was to run underground along Bow Trail but there were too many flooding concerns due to our crazy weather. You can see where the inlet to the Bow Trail tunnel from inside the Dalhousie/Somerset tunnel immediately south of the downtown core on the west side of said tunnel. [/b][/quote]
I didnt mean to imply the train should yeild to car traffic. Although it sometimes does.

The train should pass above or below traffic and end up on 7th ave or onto Kensington bridge. That would almost eliminate the traffic congestion at the West end of downtown.

As the city adds more trains the delay at those crossings will get worse. Spending a ton of money in the burbs is nice but getting in and out of the core also needs to be addressed.
JohnnyO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 12:57 PM   #20
Mr. Ski
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Mr. Ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Interesting note: We live pretty far north and were out for a drive the other day and noticed that there's a large sign along the west side Harvest Hills Blvd saying, "Home of Future LRT Station, etc, etc." This is directly north/west of the bus trap off Beddington Blvd; adjacent to the driving range.

Here's a map and satellite image. The sign was roughly in the center of the picture on the green space.

Wonder how many year's before that leg of the train gets built, and where else it will go? Anyone know?
__________________
--MR.SKI
Mr. Ski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy