10-03-2015, 06:08 PM
|
#1
|
Not Taylor
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary SW
|
US bombs hospital in Afghanistan
Quote:
The dead included seven patients from the intensive care unit, among them three children, and nine local MSF staff, the organization said. A total of 37 people, including 19 staff and 18 patients and caretakers, were injured, five of them critically. Another 30 people were still missing after the incident, MSF said.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/afghani...rike-1.3255546
|
The UN is calling it a possible war crime, the US admits they dropped bombs which "may have resulted in collateral damage to a nearby medical facility."
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 06:29 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
If Russia did this, or Iran, or Syria, the US would care
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2015, 06:35 PM
|
#3
|
Looooooooooooooch
|
"Collateral damage"
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 06:36 PM
|
#4
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Russia Today is probably having a field day over this
__________________
"Half the GM's in the league would trade their roster for our roster right now..." Kevin Lowe in 2013
|
|
|
10-04-2015, 04:06 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Terrorists strike again
|
|
|
10-04-2015, 04:08 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
|
Unbelievably horrible. Can't wait to hear how they try to get out of this one.
|
|
|
10-04-2015, 04:28 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
n Kunduz, the acting governor, Hamdullah Danishi, also suggested that the airstrike was warranted.
He said Taliban fighters had been using the Doctors Without Borders compound to plot and carry out attacks across the city, including firing rocket-propelled grenades from the property.
“The hospital campus was 100 percent used by the Taliban,” Danishi said. “The hospital has a vast garden, and the Taliban were there. We tolerated their firing for some time” before responding.
Danishi said the suspected U.S. airstrike had been aimed along the perimeter of the hospital grounds. He said the main hospital building, where most of the causalities occurred, caught fire but was not the main target.
Doctors Without Borders strongly disputed suggestions that any Taliban fighters were inside the hospital at the time of the attack.
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...205_story.html
Looks like the Afghans call in a lot of airstrikes, and they called this one in. But it seems like they're not always on the same page as the western powers. Possibly they did not like MSF treating taliban fighters and called in the airstrikes for that reason. Who knows, but it's not so cut and dry.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to worth For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2015, 02:03 PM
|
#8
|
Not Taylor
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary SW
|
So, the US has changed its story yet again...
From the same link...
Quote:
How the story shifted
3 October
U.S. forces conducted an airstrike in Kunduz city at 2:15am (local), Oct. 3, against individuals threatening the force. The strike may have resulted in collateral damage to a nearby medical facility.
Colonel Brian Tribus, spokesman for US Forces-Afghanistan
4 October
U.S. forces conducted an airstrike in Kunduz city at 2:15am (local), Oct. 3, against insurgents who were directly firing upon U.S. service members advising and assisting Afghan Security Forces in the city of Kunduz. The strike was conducted in the vicinity of a Doctors Without Borders medical facility.
Colonel Brian Tribus, spokesman for US Forces-Afghanistan
5 October
We have now learned that on October 3rd, Afghan forces advised that they were taking fire from enemy positions and asked for air support from U.S. forces. An airstrike was then called to eliminate the Taliban threat and several civilians were accidentally struck. This is different from initial reports which indicated that U.S. forces were threatened and that the airstrike was called on their behalf.
General John Campbell, commander, US Forces-Afghanistan and Nato's Operation Resolute Support
6 October
Even though the Afghans request that support, it still has to go through a rigorous US procedure to enable fires to go on the ground. We had a special operations unit that was in close vicinity that was talking to the aircraft that delivered those fires.
General John Campbell, commander, US Forces-Afghanistan and Nato's Operation Resolute Support
|
|
|
|
10-06-2015, 02:06 PM
|
#9
|
Norm!
|
I'm having a lot of trouble with the story here as it shifts from accidental to unfortunate collateral damage to deliberate targeting of a compound with a medical facility.
If there were special forces members targeting there, I would have to assume that they knew that medical facility was there.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 PM.
|
|