Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-09-2008, 08:56 AM   #1
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default Calgarypuck's Wikipedia Entry

Calgarypuck is actually referenced or mentioned a number of times on Wikipedia, yet it lacks its own entry. I think that is a gross oversight and the entire CP community should be ashamed.

There are enough inside references, CP-specific cliches and monumental events over the years to build a somewhat meaty entry, don't you think? You could have a single source for all explanations related to things like the notorious Fata and the stories behind custom user handles. If not on wikipedia, that stuff ought to be archived for posterity somewhere...
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 04:55 PM   #2
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

I'd say probably not on Wikipedia, as a Calgarypuck article would likely be deleted fairly quickly. In-jokes especially would reflect poorly on the article's likelihood of lasting. Though if CP has been the subject of multiple articles, that would help.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 12:21 PM   #3
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

I know little to nothing about wikipedia other than it's an authority in almost every subject. Thanks for the tip.
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy