Researchers led by the Space Centre's Henrik Svensmark published experimental evidence in the proceedings of the prestigious British Royal Society showing that high-energy cosmic rays do have the ability to ionize molecules in our atmosphere and nucleate clouds. Mr. Svensmark's team managed to reproduce the gases and chemistry of the lower atmosphere inside a chamber of seven cubic metres. Into this simulated atmosphere, they fired a beam of charged particles like the high-energy cosmic radiation that manages to penetrate the Earth's magnetic shielding. Their measurements of the charged particles they created and the rates of nucleation match with those required to have a measurable impact on climate. They provide experimental evidence to support the theory.
While these Danish experiments provide new evidence to support the theory of solar-forcing of climate change, the CO2 warming theory remains untested and unverified. Beyond wiggle-matching, no experimental evidence has been produced to show that an increase in CO2 can accelerate the water cycle and increase greenhouse warming with water vapour. In fact, ice core evidence from the past shows that it doesn't.
In the natural sciences, if you can't measure it, you can't prove it.
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/f...b13b2ba764&p=1
Like I have always said, CO2 emissions probably contribute to a small percentage of global warming....it is a green house gas and as such, the more you have, the warmer it will probably get. But this experiment goes to show that people cannot get stuck on CO2 emissions and Kyoto. There is a much large issue going on here.
Maybe it isn't CO2 emissions causing Global Warming!
