06-27-2024, 12:04 PM
|
#1
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
Sharks trade 14 + 42 to Buffalo for 11
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:06 PM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Yikes 3 spots for a high 2nd. Sets the bar very high on the cost to move up.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:06 PM
|
#3
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Doubt we’re getting 11 now…
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:07 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Top 10 heavy draft. They must have their eyes on one guy.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Eiserman
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:08 PM
|
#6
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Good trade for Buffalo, they could trade 14 for a player now and still have 42 in this draft.
SJ can afford to make these moves though.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Sharks want a dman, this way they could get Yakemchuk. They must have figured he wasn't available at 14.
Or they want Eiserman and figure he'd be gone.
That's my guess.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to simmer2 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Makes sense for San Jose. Not sure why Buffalo wouldn't just use the value of 11 on a step in now player.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:09 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Eiserman
|
would make a fair amount of sense, and for sure may or may not be there at 14
steep to move up 3 spots sure, but in between 11-14 (I know I know there is no 'list' ) is where most/many agree the ledge happens so makes sense
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
Good trade for Buffalo, they could trade 14 for a player now and still have 42 in this draft.
SJ can afford to make these moves though.
|
Ras for 14. Maybe the flames didn’t wanna trade 41
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:11 PM
|
#11
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Ras for 14. Maybe the flames didn’t wanna trade 41
|
It makes more sense now, Flames want another top 15. Add the 2nd and then do the trade. You still get a prospect with the player.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:13 PM
|
#12
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Wow. Sharks seem to be set on a defenceman. Good deal for the Sabres.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#13
|
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp: 
|
This makes sense for Buffalo as if they are supposedly trading it for Necas, they might as well move down 3 spots get a 2nd and the trade the 14th overall for Necas.
Squeeze any value possible before trading it for their target player.
Win Win for both teams
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to konradical For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#14
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by konradical
This makes sense for Buffalo as if they are supposedly trading it for Necas, they might as well move down 3 spots get a 2nd and the trade the 14th overall for Necas.
Squeeze any value possible before trading it for their target player.
Win Win for both teams
|
Devils 10th for necas has also been thrown out there though
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:19 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Devils 10th for necas has also been thrown out there though
|
I think that’d be done if if was on the table. Carolina won’t do better.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:21 PM
|
#16
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Devils 10th for necas has also been thrown out there though
|
It's possible that Carolina would have to add too. Buffalo might do it straight up now.
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:23 PM
|
#17
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
I'm kind of surprised this didn't happen at the draft.
Usually teams want to see who is available at the pick before trading form.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:24 PM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
Makes sense for San Jose. Not sure why Buffalo wouldn't just use the value of 11 on a step in now player.
|
I doubt a player at 11 is going to play in the NHL next year.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
|
|
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:25 PM
|
#19
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Seems like an odd trade to make today to me, would have waited to see if the guy(s) you're targetting are even still there.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-27-2024, 12:27 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK
I doubt a player at 11 is going to play in the NHL next year.
|
I think they meant Buffalo trading 11 to some team for an NHL player.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 PM.
|
|
