Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 07-23-2012, 08:54 AM   #1
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default CNOOC (Chinese) to Buy Nexen

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/stor...723-nexen.html

Any thoughts on what affect this will have on Calgarians? Jobs, real estate, etc. Will the feds allow this to go through or will it get blocked like the Potash deal? I'd also be interested to know what they're doing for retention of employees.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2012, 08:56 AM   #2
Regulator75
Franchise Player
 
Regulator75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
Exp:
Default

Nexen is having an emergency townhall meeting at 11:00 am today.
__________________

More photos on Flickr
Regulator75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:00 AM   #3
red sky
#1 Goaltender
 
red sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Only 28% of Nexen's production is in Canada and there is also an agreement to retain NXY's management team and for CNOOC to establish Calgary as its North and Central American headquarters. I don't see this being an issue for the feds.

Last edited by red sky; 07-23-2012 at 09:07 AM.
red sky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:03 AM   #4
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Will the feds allow this to go through or will it get blocked like the Potash deal?
I'd wager on it being blocked. Unless there's zero rabbling about it (which given that nationalists tend to be sensative about foreign takeovers, and lot's of folk have a hate on for China stricks me as unlikely).
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:03 AM   #5
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Underperforming company taken out by an Asian company to secure their own energy needs.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:08 AM   #6
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Ugh, not a fan of this, if only because it is likely a sign of things to come. Hopefully there is some pushback and the feds step in, but given the premium being paid on each share, I can't see there being too much anger from the shareholders.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:17 AM   #7
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay View Post
Ugh, not a fan of this, if only because it is likely a sign of things to come. Hopefully there is some pushback and the feds step in, but given the premium being paid on each share, I can't see there being too much anger from the shareholders.
With a premium like that the shareholders will vote in favour (unless they get a higher offer, which seems unlikely, imo). The only real question is the regulatory side, will the government say this isn't a net benefit to Canada and block the deal. I doubt it (based on size) but you never know. It'll depend how big a political deal it becomes.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:20 AM   #8
kirant
Franchise Player
 
kirant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
Underperforming company taken out by an Asian company to secure their own energy needs.
That's about the jist of it from what I've read.

On a side note, the CBC users are terrible. I got a headache reading the top 20 comments.
__________________
kirant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:22 AM   #9
Regorium
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

That premium is insane.

My biggest issue with this is basically how Chinese companies have (nearly) unlimited financial backing from their government. They're not really playing by the same rules as everyone else, which allows them to make such ludicrous offers like this in order to establish footholds in other markets.

Otherwise, business is business. I don't see shareholders turning down a 66% premium in their share price.
Regorium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 09:42 AM   #10
La Flames Fan
THE Chuck Storm
 
La Flames Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Really dumb question, but do the foreign ownership rules not apply? T-Mobile can't buy Telus, why can they buy Nexen?
__________________
Mediapop Films
La Flames Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 10:00 AM   #11
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toledo OH
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by La Flames Fan View Post
Really dumb question, but do the foreign ownership rules not apply? T-Mobile can't buy Telus, why can they buy Nexen?
Federal Legislation and some bylaws of the CRTC have determined that the banking and telecommunications sectors are somehow 'special' and therefore have various ownership restrictions including foriegn ownership restrictions.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cowboy89 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2012, 10:10 AM   #12
Regular_John
First Line Centre
 
Regular_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

My father in law works for Nexen, should be some interesting Sunday dinner conversation this week.
Regular_John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 10:19 AM   #13
J pold
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Man it would have been amazing to be on the Investment Banking team that advised on this deal.
J pold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 10:24 AM   #14
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regorium View Post
That premium is insane.

My biggest issue with this is basically how Chinese companies have (nearly) unlimited financial backing from their government. They're not really playing by the same rules as everyone else, which allows them to make such ludicrous offers like this in order to establish footholds in other markets.

Otherwise, business is business. I don't see shareholders turning down a 66% premium in their share price.
I agree its a pretty huge premium, but given how depressed prices/share prices are now, its not really much of a premium overall from prior trading prices. Nexen has traded in that ballpark before, so its not like they're really paying more than what the company is worth in a "normal" economy. They're just taking advantage of the fire sale that is on right now with share prices. But the shareholders are happy to get that price and avoid steep losses and years of depressed prices.

I just don't see how this is at all seen as a "net benefit" to Canada, given the amount of money that will be flowing offshore now, I can't see any increase in capital spending/re-investment making up that difference.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 10:26 AM   #15
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/stor...723-nexen.html

Any thoughts on what affect this will have on Calgarians? Jobs, real estate, etc. Will the feds allow this to go through or will it get blocked like the Potash deal? I'd also be interested to know what they're doing for retention of employees.
Calgarians have been benefiting from foreign national interests buying assets at discounted prices during the entire economic downturn. That's in terms of jobs and support on stock prices on the basis of takeover/JV speculation.

We have had Chinese, Middle East, South African, Korean, and other interests buying in Alberta for years, and it is just picking up. The Chinese in particular have been more pragmatic because they have deeper pockets, greater demand for the resource, and place far more strategic importance on these assets. There is a longer term vision that goes beyond a few fields here and there. Canada is not the only place they are active, and producing the resource is not the only interest they have. They want to find other ways to ensure their manufacturing, research and skilled labour demand stays high, for instance. As an example, they will be finding ways to use as much "made in china" product at future facility installations as possible. They want to own Canadian engineering firm capacity to give a foothold for more work to domestic engineering, and to deploy the results from those designs to other fields globally. Etc.

It is also interesting that CNOOC, Sinopec and CNPC all act independently when doing these deals. I can tell you that with CNOOC closing this big deal in two stages, it embarasses and puts pressure on those working at Sinopec and CPNC to follow suit.

Personally, I don't think this deal gets blocked, and I agree with the reasons already posted. The potash deal was specifically sensitive due to the importance that company holds for the economy and culture of Saskatchewan. Nexen is a big company, but they do not define Alberta's economy or employ a significant percentage of our population. They've also learned from the failure of the Unocal deal, and the success of others... not only where, but how to do business.

When someone says its not fair that the Chinese are able/allowed to do this, that they don't play by the same rules. That is a load of crap. If, for example, Exxon had the financial resources that the Chinese have, you can be assured they would probably as agressive or even moreso in their acquisitions. Its not just financial resources, its human resources they have. They employ millions of people in those three companies, it is just insane... Are those people suggesting that the Rockefeller run Standard Oil shouldn't have been busted up as a monopoly so they could have been more integrated with government than they already are and been able to "compete" in a "more fair" fashion with the likes of other foreign governments? I don't know... our culture and government needs to do what works for us, and have to understand that other places will do things differently. Not everyone can or should be the same.

The only thing that I am adament about on these deals is the regulation of operations and strict observance of qa/qc practices on materials used, fabrication and installation of facilities, and then controls in place during ongoing operations. It truly is a mind shift to be operating in Canada for the Chinese. They are used to doing what they want, where they want, and when they want to do it. BUT they are definitely a very mindful set of companies and will play by the rules that they have to in order to meet their objectives. So we need to be firm on what those rules are, and... quite honestly I think it will work out for both sides in the long run.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SeeGeeWhy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2012, 10:29 AM   #16
trumpethead
Powerplay Quarterback
 
trumpethead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J pold View Post
Man it would have been amazing to be on the Investment Banking team that advised on this deal.
I picture this scene somewhere in a Calgary boardroom right now.

trumpethead is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to trumpethead For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2012, 10:36 AM   #17
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay View Post
I can't see any increase in capital spending/re-investment making up that difference.
Well, when one dry hole in the gulf of mexico eats up over 50% of Nexen's quarterly cash flow, you can't say that having an owner with far deeper pockets and long term needs doesn't increase the odds of their planned Long lake and shale gas expansions being executed.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 10:43 AM   #18
La Flames Fan
THE Chuck Storm
 
La Flames Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89 View Post
Federal Legislation and some bylaws of the CRTC have determined that the banking and telecommunications sectors are somehow 'special' and therefore have various ownership restrictions including foriegn ownership restrictions.
Ahhh, I see...Thanks.
__________________
Mediapop Films
La Flames Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 01:39 PM   #19
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeGeeWhy View Post
Well, when one dry hole in the gulf of mexico eats up over 50% of Nexen's quarterly cash flow, you can't say that having an owner with far deeper pockets and long term needs doesn't increase the odds of their planned Long lake and shale gas expansions being executed.
Hold on, did Nexen get divorced?
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 02:11 PM   #20
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Nexen stock is up 50%, too bad I didn't own any. No wonder the stockholders voted in favour of the deal.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy