Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2010, 07:04 AM   #1
speede5
First Line Centre
 
speede5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default Another CF-18 crashes

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories...ter-jet-101118
speede5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 07:46 AM   #2
Pinner
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

When my Sister was stationed at Cold Lake, I was thoroughly impressed by the daily airshows.

F 22 Pilot is missing in Alaska

Quote:
An aerial search is underway in the Alaskan wilderness after a U.S. fighter pilot crashed during a training exercise.
A single-seat F22 fighter jet - the most sophisticated in the U.S. Air Force fleet - left Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage on a routine training run but crashed after 80 minutes of flight on Tuesday evening.
Wreckage of the high-speed aircraft has been found about 100 miles north of Anchorage but officials hope the as-yet-unnamed pilot could have survived the crash.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rashed-remote-

Last edited by Pinner; 11-18-2010 at 07:50 AM.
Pinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 08:43 AM   #3
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Another reason to replace these things ASAP.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 08:50 AM   #4
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

RIP the F-22 Hope they find the pilot
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 09:20 AM   #5
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn View Post
Another reason to replace these things ASAP.
That's jumping to conclusions. The crash investigation hasn't even begun yet; it's far too early to blame the age of the aircraft when this incident could have been caused by any number of reasons which may or may not have also occurred if the pilot was flying a brand new F-35 instead of a 25-30 year old CF-18.

Plus, as was pointed out above, an American F-22 crashed in Alaska today. Should the USAF "replace these things ASAP" too?
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 09:47 AM   #6
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Except that we've had two crashes in a very short period of time, one if I remember was engine failure.

We know that the CF-18's are reaching end of life, we've read about microfractures developing in the airframe due to long life and stress.

By the time we do get the F-35's the F-18 will be so worn out that we'll need to drill the bolts out to replace the engines.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 09:56 AM   #7
speede5
First Line Centre
 
speede5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Replacing the 18 has little to do with it's airworthiness. It is maintained well and is as safe as any other aircraft in the CF fleet.

The problem with it's age is that it costs much more to keep it airworthy, as stress damage accumulates you have to do more invasive repairs etc. Parts failures can be extremely costly as items which need replacement are out of production or there is a high turnaround time. This is a major issue with the Tutor fleet as well.

The CF tends to use it's aircraft well past the original service life, and that is fine but it costs a fortune. Imagine how much easier it is to find parts and service a 2010 Ford compared to a 1950 Ford. Both can be roadworthy but one the dealer will have parts on the shelf and the other you will search the internet for a month and pay through the nose.


Another of the main factors is that the 18 is not plug and play with other Nato aircraft. We aren't as capable to play with the US when they are in theatre. A recent avionics update helped but it's not the best way to go.
speede5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 09:59 AM   #8
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speede5 View Post
Replacing the 18 has little to do with it's airworthiness. It is maintained well and is as safe as any other aircraft in the CF fleet.

The problem with it's age is that it costs much more to keep it airworthy, as stress damage accumulates you have to do more invasive repairs etc. Parts failures can be extremely costly as items which need replacement are out of production or there is a high turnaround time. This is a major issue with the Tutor fleet as well.

The CF tends to use it's aircraft well past the original service life, and that is fine but it costs a fortune. Imagine how much easier it is to find parts and service a 2010 Ford compared to a 1950 Ford. Both can be roadworthy but one the dealer will have parts on the shelf and the other you will search the internet for a month and pay through the nose.


Another of the main factors is that the 18 is not plug and play with other Nato aircraft. We aren't as capable to play with the US when they are in theatre. A recent avionics update helped but it's not the best way to go.
I always thought that the upgrade would have put us more in line or close to NATO requirements, what's missing in terms of interoperability?
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 10:03 AM   #9
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Can we be sure the pilots aren't ditching them to kill off the fleet so they can get some shiny new planes to fly?
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jimmy Stang For This Useful Post:
Old 11-18-2010, 11:48 AM   #10
speede5
First Line Centre
 
speede5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I always thought that the upgrade would have put us more in line or close to NATO requirements, what's missing in terms of interoperability?
Don't know enough, sorry, I didn't mean to infer they weren't in line right now, but this was an issue and typical of Canadians we patch it up even though the aircraft had reached it's life expectancy. I was trying more to make a point that the cost to continue flying an antique can compare to purchasing new.

The problem is you don't need government approval to maintain, but everyone screams when you go to buy new.
speede5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 11:53 AM   #11
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Well I know that our helicopters require something like 8 hours of maintenance for every hour in the air.

I wonder what that ratio is like for the 18's
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 02:52 PM   #12
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Well I know that our helicopters require something like 8 hours of maintenance for every hour in the air.

I wonder what that ratio is like for the 18's
However long duct tape and crazy glue will hold I guess
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 02:55 PM   #13
SeeBass
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
That's jumping to conclusions. The crash investigation hasn't even begun yet; it's far too early to blame the age of the aircraft when this incident could have been caused by any number of reasons which may or may not have also occurred if the pilot was flying a brand new F-35 instead of a 25-30 year old CF-18.

Plus, as was pointed out above, an American F-22 crashed in Alaska today. Should the USAF "replace these things ASAP" too?

You sir are an idiot the obvious reason is gravity
SeeBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 03:10 PM   #14
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinner View Post
F 22 Pilot is missing in Alaska
Hmmm.
Quote:
The stealth fighter jet vanished from radar and lost contact with its wingman at about 7:40 p.m. Tuesday.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 03:18 PM   #15
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
No conspiracy here -- since he wasn't flying a combat mission and was over US soil, the pilot probably had his transponder broadcasting or a similar method to make his aircraft visible to radar (like TCAS).
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 03:35 PM   #16
SeeBass
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
defection
SeeBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:17 AM   #17
Day Tripper
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chair
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
Can we be sure the pilots aren't ditching them to kill off the fleet so they can get some shiny new planes to fly?
There are some brilliant folks on the CBC website making just these sorts of comments...but without the green.
Day Tripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy