Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2010, 10:10 AM   #1
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default Google Spends $86 million on low income housing

http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/30/goo...ncome-housing/

Quote:
Google is partnering with U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation (USBCDC), a division of U.S. Bank; to create an $86 million Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) fund. According to a release issued today, the funding will be used towards the construction and operation of 480 affordable rental housing units for low income families and senior citizens in seven communities throughout the West and Midwest.

It’s unusual for a technology company to get involved with these types of loans; banks and insurance companies usually help fund these credits. While the money doesn’t cover the total cost of these developments, these tax credits help them complete a project.
No I'm not trying to trump up Google. I just find it interesting that a company with millions, or perhaps billions in the bank is doing this.

Techcruch pointed this out.

Quote:
As an added bonus, the company will be able to offset its federal tax liabilities over several years with these credits.
Which begs the question, if Cowperson is indeed correct, and US corporations are sitting on trillions in cash, why don't they do more stuff like this to offset federal tax liabilities?
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 10:21 AM   #2
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post

Which begs the question, if Cowperson is indeed correct, and US corporations are sitting on trillions in cash, why don't they do more stuff like this to offset federal tax liabilities?
Because most of them already pay an absurdly low amount of tax.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 10:29 AM   #3
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/30/goo...ncome-housing/



No I'm not trying to trump up Google. I just find it interesting that a company with millions, or perhaps billions in the bank is doing this.

Techcruch pointed this out.



Which begs the question, if Cowperson is indeed correct, and US corporations are sitting on trillions in cash, why don't they do more stuff like this to offset federal tax liabilities?
Because spending 100% to save 30% is a negative NPV project. A big reason why companies have record cash piles is because they are unsure of the riskiness of deploying it. They are using cash as a safety blanket. So why would you spend your safety blanket in still uncertain times?
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 10:34 AM   #4
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Google is spending the massive cash tsunami their search engine ads pull in on all sorts of stuff. Aquisitions of every other internet company that moves, green power, and now low income housing.

It's like they're throwing everything they can think of at the wall to see what sticks.

Michael
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 10:41 AM   #5
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Low income housign tax credits aren't simply a way to reduce your tax burden, they are also an incredibly lucrative income source. Unused credits can be spun off to other companies, typically realizing pretty solid profits. Google has the cash reserves and liquidity to make a move that other companies typically can't, and it also gives them a pretty decent PR boost.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 11:25 AM   #6
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Do these numbers seem a little odd? 86 million for 480 units comes out to a construction cost of $179 thousand per unit. Seems like they should be able to stretch that money further.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 11:46 AM   #7
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp View Post
Do these numbers seem a little odd? 86 million for 480 units comes out to a construction cost of $179 thousand per unit. Seems like they should be able to stretch that money further.
Quote:
the funding will be used towards the construction and operation
That might explain it
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 11:54 AM   #8
yads
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:
Default

I'm sure they'll use this low income housing to improve their search algorithms in some way. Do all the houses contain CC cameras and by living in one you consent to let google record your life?

Only half joking.
yads is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy