Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2010, 11:18 PM   #1
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default Hypothetical Illegal Basement Suite

I suggest this forum can be used as a source of information for anyone wondering about cases involving hypothetical illegal basement suites.

I'll start with some questions that hopefully someone can answer:

1. if the city suggests that an inspector is coming to inspect a house to see if there are more dwelling units than allowed for the property, what is the process (hypothetically would the city just come in and give a date to have everything comply and then come back for a follow-up).

2. what type fines / penalties can be incurred by the owner of a hypothetical illegal basement suite

3. hypothetically speaking, could the owner of a hypothetical basement suite incur any costs penalties if the following exists:

-electric sub-panel installed to code although not formally inspected by an electrician

-windows do not meet code

4. hypothetically speaking, would the homeowner be okay to leave the suite in for the inspection, or should they try to have it and all evidence removed (i.e. stove, locks, conforming but not inspected electrical sub-panel) prior to the inspection.
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:18 PM   #2
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I'm going to guess none of this is hypothetical....
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jar_e For This Useful Post:
Old 01-14-2010, 11:19 PM   #3
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

In other topic-relevant but completely unrelated news, I may be looking for an electrician to do a quick inspection of a conforming but not-inspected sub-panel.
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to StoneCole For This Useful Post:
Old 01-14-2010, 11:21 PM   #4
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

In other topic-relevant but completely unrelated news, I may be looking for a concrete cutter / window installer to install larger windows for the basement of a house.

...it's funny I've actually inquired about this and the company wouldn't tell me what size of window complies...the person I talked would only say "we sell/install two sizes of windows and this size is the most commonly installed size"...if anyone can comment on this I'd be interested to hear why the organization was so vague.
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:22 PM   #5
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

In other topic-relevant but completely unrelated news, I might have a house for rent (or even for sale) in the coming months, so stay tuned.
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:22 PM   #6
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Am I the only one who thought this was going to be another Chicken on the Way thread?
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:22 PM   #7
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

To actually add something of substance in this thread....

somewhere here should be your answer (http://content.calgary.ca/CCA/City+H...ing+Policy.htm)
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:24 PM   #8
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

In other hypothetically topic-relevant but completely unrelated news, I'm pretty sure that the sister of a tennant of mine is a complete big fat dirty that sticks her nose into and effs up the lives of people that aren't really the cause of her family issues.
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:29 PM   #9
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

There are tons of illegal basement suites (mother in law suites) in Calgary. I would be less worried about the fact that you have the suite and more worried about at least meeting code on a few things. Don't be running an extension cord to some kind of jerry rigged stove (duh) and the windows? You mention windows? If a person can't escape out the window, you're playing with fire. And when I say "playing with fire" I mean that you're seriously fata'd if there is ever a fire.

That fire in Parkdale last year killed three people because they couldn't escape from the basement suite. Don't know whether it was bars on the windows or small windows, or windows painetd shut... Doesn't matter. Make damn sure the windows are sufficient.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 02:32 AM   #10
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 07:32 AM   #11
moncton golden flames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
moncton golden flames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

minimum egress windows:

min. opening area = 0.35m2 with a minimum of any one side being .38m in length.

ie: .38mx.92m window opening or .592mx.592m opening.

reference - Figure A-9.7.1.2.(2) of the Alberta Building Code 2006
__________________


Last edited by moncton golden flames; 01-15-2010 at 07:34 AM.
moncton golden flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 07:39 AM   #12
algernon
Lifetime Suspension
 
algernon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Removed by Mod
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Each dwelling unit must have at least one exit which
leads directly outside. Entry doors serving the exit need
to be a minimum 810mm (2’-8”) wide.

Bedroom egress windows
Note: shaded areas indicate the required
unobstructed opening where a minimum dimension
of 380mm (15”) and an area of 0.35m2 (3.8ft2)
are required.
Here's the pamphlet: http://www.calgary.ca/DocGallery/BU/...quirements.pdf

I installed 30"x30" casement(opens like a door) windows in my basement, that meet code. I have a walk-out, if I didn't, I'd need window wells.

Besides windows, the City is harping on Interconnected Smoke and Co2 detectors. If your place was built before 2006, they are more relaxed on meeting some of the other requirements.
algernon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 08:00 AM   #13
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
There are tons of illegal basement suites (mother in law suites) in Calgary. I would be less worried about the fact that you have the suite and more worried about at least meeting code on a few things. Don't be running an extension cord to some kind of jerry rigged stove (duh) and the windows? You mention windows? If a person can't escape out the window, you're playing with fire. And when I say "playing with fire" I mean that you're seriously fata'd if there is ever a fire.

That fire in Parkdale last year killed three people because they couldn't escape from the basement suite. Don't know whether it was bars on the windows or small windows, or windows painetd shut... Doesn't matter. Make damn sure the windows are sufficient.
They had bars on the windows and an inadequate smoke alarm system.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Pr...627/story.html

So OP, hypothetically speaking, ensuring there are adequate smoke alarms is another thing to look into.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 08:00 AM   #14
North East Goon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

I think most people are fine with someone having a basement suite, it only becomes a problem when your tennants start taking neighbours parking spots. Hypothetically you should make sure there is a set parking structure for these hypothetical new tennants.
North East Goon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 08:38 AM   #15
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Hypothetically, I'd be interested to know this too.

For future reference, you know what I mean?
__________________
REDVAN!
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 09:07 AM   #16
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't it only be defined a suite if you had a seperate entrance, and a kitchen installed?

Pull out the appliances, remove the door going upstairs, and call it your man cave that you happened to rent to a friend who would come upstairs to cook all their meals.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 09:28 AM   #17
algernon
Lifetime Suspension
 
algernon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Removed by Mod
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
Wouldn't it only be defined a suite if you had a seperate entrance, and a kitchen installed?

Pull out the appliances, remove the door going upstairs, and call it your man cave that you happened to rent to a friend who would come upstairs to cook all their meals.
I think this is right. It becomes a suite, once you have a kitchen. I don't think there's a problem with a door to the basement, but, it would be a good idea to put on a non locking doorknob.
algernon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 09:49 AM   #18
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
Wouldn't it only be defined a suite if you had a seperate entrance, and a kitchen installed?

Pull out the appliances, remove the door going upstairs, and call it your man cave that you happened to rent to a friend who would come upstairs to cook all their meals.
I could be wrong on this, so don't quote me...

Once you put a toilet and a oven in a basement it's classified as a suite. So hypothetically if you removed the oven it would no longer be a suite and it would no longer have to meet the qualifications of a suite. And hypothetically with the oven removed it would pass a city inspection. Of course once the oven finds it's way back into the basement and a tenant wanders in it's an illegal basement suite again.

Now to have a legal basement suite you need things like a separate entrance and I believe a fire rating between the basement and the main floor. The majority of basements probably don't have a separate entrance to the outside let alone a fire separation.
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 12:41 PM   #19
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

...has no one experienced this situation before? I guess I'm still wondering about the process that occurs when an inspector visits during this hypothetical situation:

Would the inspector just come around, tell the homeowner to change things (i.e. remove stove, entrance) and tell the homeowner they will be back in a month for a follow-up to ensure compliance...or would he issue some penalty (i.e. a fine) based on the initial visit?
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 12:44 PM   #20
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

I'm also looking for some commentary on the following:

If the hypothetical downstairs tennant has a rental agreement that states stove, etc. will be provided...what would the homeowner have to do in terms of notice, etc. if they were to remove the stove and eventually have the tennant move out?

The hypothetical rental agreement is this case: the tennant had a six month lease that expired and they are on the first month (going on second) of a month-to-month continuation following the initial lease. How much notice does the homeowner in this hypothetical situation have to give the tennant?
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy