09-27-2009, 02:18 PM
|
#1
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
|
Math: Building sideboards for stairs
OK, so I'm trying to cut sideboards for the stairs I'm trying to build. I need to figure out the short side measurement.
The height to the top of the deck is 29 inches.
The long side of the side panel is going to go out 3 feet (36 inches)
Using a2 + b2 = c2, I have figured the diagonal of the triangle to be 46.25 inches.
The width of the board is 9.25 inches.
Trying to figure out the short side so I can measure that out, and make my cuts so that the one side is flush with the deck, and the other is flush with the ground.
Any ideas?
__________________
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:27 PM
|
#2
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CP House of Ill Repute
|
Subtract 9.25 from each side and use the Pythagorean theorem again to calculate the length.
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
|
#3
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
|
31.48 inches
__________________
"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should."
Max Ehrmann
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Boo Radley For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:29 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp
Subtract 9.25 from each side and use the Pythagorean theorem again to calculate the length.
|
I had thought about that, but the cut is going to be longer that 9.25, right?
__________________
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:30 PM
|
#5
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boo Radley
31.48 inches
|
Can you explain, so I don't jump into cutting... again...
__________________
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:34 PM
|
#6
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Yes, give me a second
__________________
"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should."
Max Ehrmann
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:35 PM
|
#7
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Have you tried using pie?
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:37 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
|
it is about 27.425
i used Illustrator and created your triangle. then a 9.25 plank...measured it and got that.
your smaller triangle is about 17 X 21.5
__________________
AS SEEN ON TV
Last edited by awildermode; 09-27-2009 at 02:40 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to awildermode For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:38 PM
|
#9
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
|
1. Calculate the lower right angle to be 38.85. inverse tan of 29/36.
2. Construct smaller triangle in lower right using angle 38.85 and opposite length of 9.25 to determine an adjacent side length of 11.484 inches.
3. Determine the two sides of your smaller triangle: a) subtract 9.25 in from 29 to get 19.75 inches b) subtract 11.484 inches from 36 to get 24.516 inches
4) Sides of your smaller triangle are 19.75 in and 24.516 inches.
Use pythagorean theorem to get your missing length of 31.48 inches.
If that is incorrect i will come over and and help and bring the beer!
Radley
__________________
"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should."
Max Ehrmann
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:40 PM
|
#10
|
Scoring Winger
|
31.48, Boo has it right. The bottom dimension will be 24.52 inches.
Edit-What Boo said.
Last edited by RatherDashing; 09-27-2009 at 02:41 PM.
Reason: Too slow.
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:41 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
|
^uh, at least one of us is wrong
__________________
AS SEEN ON TV
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 02:47 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
Have you tried using pie?
|
I usually use apple in this sort of situation, but sometimes blueberry is best.
__________________
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:09 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
*head explodes*
__________________
But living an honest life - for that you need the truth. That's the other thing I learned that day, that the truth, however shocking or uncomfortable, leads to liberation and dignity. -Ricky Gervais
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:20 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
Prototype:
I am not sure which one is right. I just redid the thing on Illustrator and got the same results. I hope I did not derail your progress in your construction, sorry if I did.
Good luck.
__________________
AS SEEN ON TV
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:27 PM
|
#15
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
|
Question for awilder and boo... are either of you using the 9.25 as the width as shown in the picture. When it's not cut, it's 9.25. The width is more on a diagnol <sp?>, not the way it's shown... if that makes any sense...
__________________
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:35 PM
|
#16
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Do not cut yet I am re-checking my calculations. From your drawing I think I miss read the width. I will double check
__________________
"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should."
Max Ehrmann
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:39 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prototype
Question for awilder and boo... are either of you using the 9.25 as the width as shown in the picture. When it's not cut, it's 9.25. The width is more on a diagnol <sp?>, not the way it's shown... if that makes any sense...
|
Oh, that changes everything. if the board is 9.25 in vertical measurement, meaning the actual width of the board is about 7.3
then yes, boo is correct. measurement is about 31.475 short side is 19.75 base of about 24.6
__________________
AS SEEN ON TV
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:42 PM
|
#18
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
|
The board is originally 10 feet long, 9.25 inches wide, and about 1.5 inches thick.
The length to cut is what I'm looking for, and the thickness shouldn't play in this equation.
Here goes nothing.
__________________
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:43 PM
|
#19
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
|
So when I re-do the calculations using an un-cut board width of 9.25 inches.
I calculate your missing length to be 27.29 inches.
The confusion is in the width. If the width at an angle of 90 measures 9.25 inches then the length should be 27.29 inches. From your drawing I thought the 9.25 inches was measured at the diagonal.
I guess I will be over with the Beer
__________________
"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should."
Max Ehrmann
Last edited by Boo Radley; 09-27-2009 at 03:49 PM.
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 03:46 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
I guess i was right the first time. Boo and his silly math is no match for my mad illustrator skills
__________________
AS SEEN ON TV
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to awildermode For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 PM.
|
|