Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2010, 01:52 PM   #1
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default 20th Anniversary of Meech Lake

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1614610/

There were aspects of it and the Charlottown accord that I liked. (Voted Yes in the Charlottown referendum).

the fact that Trudeau was against it appealed to me even more.

Recognition of Quebec as a distinct society didn't seem like that big a deal. Granting them constitutional veto power was a big deal.

I liked de-centralization of power.
I liked senate reform
I liked provincial input into appointments to the Supreme Court

had they included First Nation people in the accord (Aboriginal self-government), Elijah Harper likely would not have opposed it in the Manitoba legislature, and Clyde Wells would not have had reason to cancel the Newfoundland vote
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2010, 02:06 PM   #2
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It was the last best chance at unity.

But life goes on.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 02:24 PM   #3
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

The veto was the big problem, and by itself enough to kill Meech Lake, imo.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 02:31 PM   #4
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

How much do you need to change the constitution though? Have they changed it at all in the last 10 years?
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 03:06 PM   #5
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

And yet Quebec still hasn't left... what a bitter pill...
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 03:11 PM   #6
Byrns
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Byrns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

.6%
Byrns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 03:23 PM   #7
Bownesian
Scoring Winger
 
Bownesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bowness
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
How much do you need to change the constitution though? Have they changed it at all in the last 10 years?
They added Nunavut in the last 10 years which required a small change.
Bownesian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 03:34 PM   #8
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1614610/

There were aspects of it and the Charlottown accord that I liked. (Voted Yes in the Charlottown referendum).

the fact that Trudeau was against it appealed to me even more.

Recognition of Quebec as a distinct society didn't seem like that big a deal. Granting them constitutional veto power was a big deal.

I liked de-centralization of power.
I liked senate reform
I liked provincial input into appointments to the Supreme Court

had they included First Nation people in the accord (Aboriginal self-government), Elijah Harper likely would not have opposed it in the Manitoba legislature, and Clyde Wells would not have had reason to cancel the Newfoundland vote
One BIG item against the Charlottown Accord that pretty much would have been a showstopper for me had I been able to vote at the time was that Quebec was to be constitutionally enshrined to have at least one quarter of the seats in the house of commons.

Might not seem like a big deal with respect to the demographics of the day, but since then and present-day trends have the rest of Canada growing at a faster clip than Quebec. While calling Quebec a 'distinct society' doesn't seem like much of an effort or affront to English Canadians, the idea that their vote shall permanently magnify their minority is, regardless of cultural arguements.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy