01-23-2011, 02:30 PM
|
#1
|
Threadkiller
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
|
America, aint it great? Ferret chews off 7 fingers of baby boy...
http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/01/11/...?iref=obinsite
PS YES I am just kidding with the thread title, no need to get all hyper about it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ricosuave For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-23-2011, 02:41 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
That is a ridiculous story, but this made me laugh:
Quote:
In the wake of the most recent incident, ferret activists and rescuers from around the country have called Ambrose about the pet.
"We've had them calling from all sorts of states asking about the ferret," Ambrose said. "Well, I guess if you collect dead ferrets, you can have one."
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to worth For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-23-2011, 02:43 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
|
I hope the parents get multiple books thrown at them for this. Their negligence resulted in the permanent disfigurement of their child.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Reaper For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-23-2011, 02:58 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
I hope the parents get multiple books thrown at them for this. Their negligence resulted in the permanent disfigurement of their child.
|
I don't know about that, unless we know the facts. We used to own a ferret and it was the most timid animal; it never bit anyone. What constitutes neglegience? Is it owning a pet that has the potential to do this to a child or the fact that the animal maimed the child? If it's the former, then perhaps anyone who owns a dog or cat and has an infant should also be charged as you suggest. This may just be a very unfortunate turn of events but I don't know if it constitutes neglegience.
Whatever, this is terrible.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 03:13 PM
|
#5
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Could just be a series of unfortunate circumstances / coincidences. No one knows for sure.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 03:16 PM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
At least a cat will wait until you are dead before it tries to eat you.
Never understood the appeal of owning a rodent.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 03:30 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by llama64
At least a cat will wait until you are dead before it tries to eat you.
Never understood the appeal of owning a rodent.
|
It's not a rodent. Our ferret was really cool, a nice non-biter. Mice are rodents, ferrets are not.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 04:08 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I think he was referring to the cat.
|
I doubt it.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 04:37 PM
|
#9
|
wins 10 internets
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
I don't know about that, unless we know the facts. We used to own a ferret and it was the most timid animal; it never bit anyone. What constitutes neglegience? Is it owning a pet that has the potential to do this to a child or the fact that the animal maimed the child? If it's the former, then perhaps anyone who owns a dog or cat and has an infant should also be charged as you suggest. This may just be a very unfortunate turn of events but I don't know if it constitutes neglegience.
Whatever, this is terrible.
|
how about not waking up until the ferret had eaten the 7th finger? i would imagine after the first bite the baby would be wailing pretty hard, were they never woken up before for a feeding? or how about making sure the door to the baby's room is closed so no pets of any kind could get in, that just seems like common sense for a newborn
ferrets are ugly, nasty critters, but the parents have the sole responsibility in this case
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 04:49 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
I don't know about that, unless we know the facts. We used to own a ferret and it was the most timid animal; it never bit anyone. What constitutes neglegience? Is it owning a pet that has the potential to do this to a child or the fact that the animal maimed the child? If it's the former, then perhaps anyone who owns a dog or cat and has an infant should also be charged as you suggest. This may just be a very unfortunate turn of events but I don't know if it constitutes neglegience.
Whatever, this is terrible.
|
The negligence part is falling asleep with the baby unattended with such a "bitey" animal having the run of the house. To boot, who sleeps through seven fingers being chewed off their baby while in the same room? Something tells me that sleeping is code for "passed out."
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 05:39 PM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
I hope the parents get multiple books thrown at them for this. Their negligence resulted in the permanent disfingerment of their child.
|
fixed
__________________
"we're going to win game 7," Daniel Sedin told the Vancpuver Sun.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to drewboy12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-23-2011, 06:29 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
The negligence part is falling asleep with the baby unattended with such a "bitey" animal having the run of the house. To boot, who sleeps through seven fingers being chewed off their baby while in the same room? Something tells me that sleeping is code for "passed out."
|
I'd easily believe this. I can hear my kid's normal "I'm pissed off for some reason" crying from two floors below with music on. If they were screaming right next to me in pain I would imagine any parent would be up and next to that crib before their eyes were even completely open.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 06:34 PM
|
#13
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
I say we ban ferrets as pets. If it saves just one child, then it's worth it.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 06:37 PM
|
#14
|
Took an arrow to the knee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
|
Down with ferrets! Damn Democrats and their free-ferret policy.
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.
|
|