Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-20-2007, 10:57 AM   #1
Dodsdomd
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Dodsdomd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default Good Mortgage Rate?

Does 5.89% for 5 years seem like a fair rate?
Dodsdomd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 11:07 AM   #2
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Bank of Canada might lower interest rates on December 4 but that would only immediately affect variable rate mortgages and line of credits.

I'd personally go with the secure line of credits. More flexibilty on payments and no payout penalty if you ever decide to sell.
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 11:11 AM   #3
Dodsdomd
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Dodsdomd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobatuzzied View Post
Bank of Canada might lower interest rates on December 4 but that would only immediately affect variable rate mortgages and line of credits.

I'd personally go with the secure line of credits. More flexibilty on payments and no payout penalty if you ever decide to sell.
How does the secure line of credit work?
Dodsdomd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 11:50 AM   #4
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodsdomd View Post
How does the secure line of credit work?
You use your house as security and your rate is prime. Minimum payments are monthly and is just your interest. So right now prime is 6.25%. If you have a $250,000 LOC you would need to pay minimum $1302. You would need to pay more then that each month though,or you will never pay off your LOC.

It's more flexible because you can put more money towards it some months but for months like December then you might just want to pay the min.

If you went with the rate you gave above on the 5 year close you would be paying $1583/month
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 11:59 AM   #5
simmer2
Franchise Player
 
simmer2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobatuzzied View Post
Bank of Canada might lower interest rates on December 4 but that would only immediately affect variable rate mortgages and line of credits.

I'd personally go with the secure line of credits. More flexibilty on payments and no payout penalty if you ever decide to sell.
I disagree with this. I did a ton of research comparing a traditional mortgage with a LOC Credit style mortgage before I took one out. I compared Manulife with Royal Bank, and in the end a traditional mortgage is better for you. The interest rate is lower with a traditional mortgage. With the difference in interest rates between Royal and Manulife, put that money towards your principal with Royal Bank and it is a better option.

Simply put, lower interest rates = better for you. Whether you want to go fixed or variable, that's a different question. I currently have a variable closed mortgage for 5 years at 5.5% (Prime - 0.75%). Variable has always outperformed fixed interest rates over a period of time, so I'd recommend that. Then again, some people like the security of knowing their interest rate is fixed, so to each their own.

Do a bit of research and talk to some mortgage experts so you can get a better understanding of how it works.
simmer2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 12:35 PM   #6
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobatuzzied View Post
If you have a $250,000 LOC you would need to pay minimum $1302. (snip)

If you went with the rate you gave above on the 5 year close you would be paying $1583/month
Right, but with the $1302 payment, absolutely nothing goes towards principal, so there is also no penalty to make yourself end up years behind in paying off your house. Bottom line is 6.25 is a worse rate than 5.89

To answer the OP's question, last week when I was looking the best I could find for 5 year was 5.97%.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 12:58 PM   #7
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

We got 5.69% on 5 years fixed. That was in September though...
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:04 PM   #8
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
Right, but with the $1302 payment, absolutely nothing goes towards principal, so there is also no penalty to make yourself end up years behind in paying off your house. Bottom line is 6.25 is a worse rate than 5.89

To answer the OP's question, last week when I was looking the best I could find for 5 year was 5.97%.
Yeah i mentioned that in the first part of the post. Also if you think mortgage rates are going to fall which they might do, you can also go from the LOC to a mortgage at any time.

This isn't the product for everyone and it's actually harder to qualify for a LOC then a mortgage since it's revolving credit. hmmm just talked with my mortgage broker and he is doing 4 LOCs for every mortgage.
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:16 PM   #9
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobatuzzied View Post
You use your house as security and your rate is prime. Minimum payments are monthly and is just your interest. So right now prime is 6.25%. If you have a $250,000 LOC you would need to pay minimum $1302. You would need to pay more then that each month though,or you will never pay off your LOC.

It's more flexible because you can put more money towards it some months but for months like December then you might just want to pay the min.

If you went with the rate you gave above on the 5 year close you would be paying $1583/month
Lets compare apples to apples - if you were to pay $1583/month on both types of debt, the traditional mortgage would cost you less...simple as that.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:26 PM   #10
simmer2
Franchise Player
 
simmer2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobatuzzied View Post
Yeah i mentioned that in the first part of the post. Also if you think mortgage rates are going to fall which they might do, you can also go from the LOC to a mortgage at any time.

This isn't the product for everyone and it's actually harder to qualify for a LOC then a mortgage since it's revolving credit. hmmm just talked with my mortgage broker and he is doing 4 LOCs for every mortgage.
I qualified for an LOC just fine. And I find that stat hard to believe that he's doing LOC's 4:1 over mortgages. With people's spending habits, I firmly believe that the LOC is more of a detriment than a help to most people.
simmer2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:51 PM   #11
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madman View Post
Lets compare apples to apples - if you were to pay $1583/month on both types of debt, the traditional mortgage would cost you less...simple as that.
What if the prime rate fell to 5.25% or 5% in the next 6 months?
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:52 PM   #12
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

I'm in the midst of a 5 year 4.50 fixed rate. Lucky me.

I was on ING the other day and saw a 5 year fixed at 5.99.

Last edited by TurnedTheCorner; 11-20-2007 at 01:54 PM.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:55 PM   #13
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simmer2 View Post
I qualified for an LOC just fine. And I find that stat hard to believe that he's doing LOC's 4:1 over mortgages. With people's spending habits, I firmly believe that the LOC is more of a detriment than a help to most people.
Oh yeah. i totally agree. Buying a car or electronics with your LOC is not a very good idea.

Hmm well i just asked him. He works for TD.

Like i said I would prefer the LOC. and other people prefer conventional mortgages. I'm biased though cuz i locked into a 5 year mortgage in 2000 at 7.25% which at that time was already 1% off the posted rates of 8.25%. Then the tech crash came and interest rates dropped to 3.25%. So unless i was willing to pay like a $20000 payout penalty i was soooo locked! hahaha.
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:56 PM   #14
zukes
Nostradamus
 
zukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London Ont.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurnedTheCorner View Post
I'm in the midst of a 5 year 4.50 fixed rate. Lucky me.

I was on ING the other day and saw a 5 year fixed at 5.99.
Yep, I am lucky too, 4.76 is mine.
__________________
agggghhhhhh!!!
zukes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 02:03 PM   #15
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

I think that the original rate is a good one...the best I'm aware of right now is 5.99 fixed for five years.

Traditionally people with floating rates have done better than people with fixed rates over the long-term. The Manulife account reference above is not for everyone; some people haven't got the discipline to use it properly and get out of debt faster.

Further, the LOC accounts should be used as part of an overall financial strategy to maximize their benefit. No question though, if they are used solely as a mortgage product (with no other debt factored in, and no other reason for using one other than paying interest only) then the use is limited. At this point with a period of low interest rates and rising rates over the past 18 months or so, most people want to lock-in and preserve those lower rates.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 02:32 PM   #16
Julio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Olympic Saddledome
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simmer2 View Post
I qualified for an LOC just fine. And I find that stat hard to believe that he's doing LOC's 4:1 over mortgages. With people's spending habits, I firmly believe that the LOC is more of a detriment than a help to most people.
I would ask if that 4 to 1 ratio was on 1st mortgages. For example, I just did a LOC/2nd mortgage with TD @ prime (right now 6.25%) because the g'friend has had some credit card debts, so we consolidated.
In the main point, I would definitely say that the mortgage is the way to go, but to try and get as many options as possible for quick repayment, so that if you have the extra $ you can put it on. Most people don't seem to realize that most mortgages have the option to double your payments, or to put a lump sum on once a year. Make sure what your options on this are, expand them if possible, and you get the flexibility of a LOC to some degree with the lower interest of a mortgage.
Julio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 02:43 PM   #17
Got Miikka?
One of the Nine
 
Got Miikka?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

^ 15 % / year or double payments, yes. You can also choose to do 'rapid' payments on your mtg which basically equates to two extra payments per year - this can shave years off your ammoritization. Funny how a little equals a lot.

As far as interest rates go, you can book a rate if you find one you like - this exists because not everyone walks into the bank and has everything in place for their mortgage, but we all know things change, so you are left with some assurance of a decent rate - at TD this booking holds the rate for 120 days.
Got Miikka? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 02:56 PM   #18
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobatuzzied View Post
What if the prime rate fell to 5.25% or 5% in the next 6 months?
And what if it went up?

If the person is concerned about rates dropping, then they should look at a variable rate mortgage.

Why not have a conventional mortgage with a lower rate than a LOC and then secure a HELOC and have the advantages of both?
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 02:56 PM   #19
DementedReality
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

i am still very intrigued by the manulife ONE product.... i know we talked about it a few months ago, anyone have any new comments to make on the pro's and con's?
DementedReality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 03:09 PM   #20
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DementedReality View Post
i am still very intrigued by the manulife ONE product.... i know we talked about it a few months ago, anyone have any new comments to make on the pro's and con's?
PM Sent.

I think that this is a fantastic product in general, and has some great benefits. I have my bias (as I've stated before), but if this is a good fit for your situation, I'm convinced that there is nothing to rival this product.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy