Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-17-2007, 09:59 AM   #1
Jayems
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Blackwater Security banned from Iraq

Quote:
Iraq's Interior Ministry has revoked the license of Blackwater USA, an American security firm whose contractors are blamed for a Sunday gunbattle in Baghdad that left eight civilians dead. The U.S. State Department said it plans to investigate what it calls a "terrible incident."
There is a video out there of some contracting company who are taking pot-shots at civillians, and shooting people at random. Sometimes I wonder if they're just as bad as the insurgents.


http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/...ain/index.html
Jayems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:04 AM   #2
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

When you fill a DOS contract you are de facto working as a DOS entity not under your own "license".

Not going to change anything.

As far as I know...BW 'license' in Iraq has been out of date for a while now. Like I said...nothing is going to change.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:08 AM   #3
Jayems
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
When you fill a DOS contract you are de facto working as a DOS entity not under your own "license".

Not going to change anything.

As far as I know...BW 'license' in Iraq has been out of date for a while now. Like I said...nothing is going to change.
So they can still work there? Whats a DOS contract? Department of Security?
Jayems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:20 AM   #4
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayems View Post
So they can still work there? Whats a DOS contract? Department of Security?
Department of State....US State Department.

Yes they can still work there.....BlackWater does not have a contract with the Iraqi Government...therefore the Iraqi government can't ban them from Iraq.

If they ban the State Department....then Blackwater won't be able to work there.

But as usual....the media took something and ran with it....
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:23 AM   #5
Jayems
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Department of State....US State Department.

Yes they can still work there.....BlackWater does not have a contract with the Iraqi Government...therefore the Iraqi government can't ban them from Iraq.

If they ban the State Department....then Blackwater won't be able to work there.

But as usual....the media took something and ran with it....
Gotcha.
Jayems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 12:50 PM   #6
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Sooooo...I wonder if legally Iraq could call Blackwater staff 'enemy combatants' and would they fall under the Geneva conventions?
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 02:02 PM   #7
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozzie_DeBear View Post
Sooooo...I wonder if legally Iraq could call Blackwater staff 'enemy combatants' and would they fall under the Geneva conventions?
Hmm...

There are literally thousands of contracters in Iraq these days....not all of them are shooting innocent civilians.

I wonder what the Iraqi government would say if BlackWater decided to pull out of Iraq....and took their medical facilities with them. The backlash would be immense.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 03:34 PM   #8
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

True, but do mercenaries fall under the Geneva conventions? And are they soldiers of the hiring state or civilians or neither?
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 03:57 PM   #9
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

Isn't this the same company that had one of their operatives burned alive and then hung on a bridge in Mosul a couple of years ago?

Makes you wonder if their focus has shifted.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 04:14 PM   #10
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Well here is the Geneva convention take on Mercenaries

Article 47.-Mercenaries

1. A mercenary shall not have the right to be a combatant or a prisoner of war.
2. A mercenary is any person who:

(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;

(b) Does, in fact, take a direct part in the hostilities;

(c) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a Party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar ranks and functions in the armed forces of that Party;

(d) Is neither a national of a Party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a Party to the conflict;

(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict; and

(f) Has not been sent by a State which is not a Party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 05:24 PM   #11
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan View Post
Isn't this the same company that had one of their operatives burned alive and then hung on a bridge in Mosul a couple of years ago?

Makes you wonder if their focus has shifted.
Sure is.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy