Budget Office Analysis Says War Could Cost $1 Trillion

[Flash Walken]

Link

The United States has already allocated more than $500 billion on the day-to-day combat operations of what are now 190,000 troops and a variety of reconstruction efforts.

In a report to lawmakers yesterday, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that even under the rosiest scenario — an immediate and substantial reduction of troops — American taxpayers will feel the financial consequences of the war for at least a decade.

The calculations include the estimated cost to leave some US forces behind for at least several years to support the Iraqi government, but they also predict other long-term costs, such as extended medical care and disability compensation for wounded soldiers and survivor’s benefits for the families of the thousands of combat-zone fatalities.

The cost of the war in Iraq and other military operations has soared to the point where “we are now spending on these activities more than 10 percent of all the government’s annually appropriated funds,” said Robert A. Sunshine, the budget office’s assistant director for budget analysis.

...

The 16-page analysis estimated that the medical costs would be more than $9 billion if the United States stations 30,000 troops in Iraq, and would cost almost $13 billion if 75,000 troops remain there for the next several years.

The report estimates that training police and ground forces in Iraq and a relatively smaller number in Afghanistan over the next decade will require at least an additional $50 billion. Meanwhile, the government will have to spend at least $20 billion more for US diplomatic operations, to assist local governments, and to promote economic development in Iraq through 2017 — regardless of how many US troops remain in the country.

SURGE SURGE SURGE.

[oldschoolcalgary]

i just read 4000 per sec...which is pretty insane...

[Flash Walken]

10 Percent of all Government expendiatures...

That is a truly Massive sum.

[LouCypher]

In the very least for a country with such a massive national debt this war should be considered an incredibly irresponsible financial move and use of tax payer money. The cost to date would probably be a pretty good basis for a free nationwide healthcare system in the States but why would they care about their own people....

[Flash Walken]

Originally Posted by LouCypher

In the very least for a country with such a massive national debt this war should be considered an incredibly irresponsible financial move and use of tax payer money. The cost to date would probably be a pretty good basis for a free nationwide healthcare system in the States but why would they care about their own people....

And amazingly, this doesn't even include spending for the bloated and useless Department of Homeland Security, price of Afghanistan, and the various other 'War on Terror' expendiatures (like buying Turkish approval for the Iraq invasion, arms and 'aid' shipments to various partners of the 'Coalition of the Willing', even the recent shipment of $20 billion in arms to the most autocratic government in the middle east, Saudi Arabia).

My apologies for replying to my own thread so much.

[Zarathustra]

These numbers are unfathomable.

[skins]

blame the military industrial complex?