Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-02-2004, 08:27 AM   #1
Fuzzy McGillicuddy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: up north (by the airport)
Exp:
Default

Fox News reporter Carl Cameron wrote a story that contained bogus Kerry quotes following this week's debate.


Link: Fox News - Oops, sorry

"Didn't my nails and cuticles look great? What a good debate!?'' Kerry said Friday.

"It's about the Supreme Court. Women should like me! I do manicures''



Sadly, many Americans may have seen this and the damage is done.

And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.
Fuzzy McGillicuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 08:38 AM   #2
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Ridiculous. Just a stupid thing to say about anyone, never mind a Presidential candidate.

The depth some of these "journalists" go to in an effort to make a name for themselves is frightening....not to mention idiotic. The guy will never be taken seriously again...career suicide.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 09:06 AM   #3
Cowperson
CP Pontiff
 
Cowperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Fuzzy McGillicuddy@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
Fox News reporter Carl Cameron wrote a story that contained bogus Kerry quotes following this week's debate.


Link: Fox News - Oops, sorry

"Didn't my nails and cuticles look great? What a good debate!?'' Kerry said Friday.

"It's about the Supreme Court. Women should like me! I do manicures''



Sadly, many Americans may have seen this and the damage is done.

And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.
"the item was based on a reporter's partial script that had been written in jest"

That's obviously the only truthful thing in the story.

If you quizzed most reporters you would probably find they've done something similar to amuse themselves at one time or another . . . . most wouldn't have had it grabbed out of their file by an editor, taken seriously and posted on a website.

The fault lies with the editor in this case if you ask me. That in turn goes to the issue of whether or not FOX is biased and the fact an editor would believe John Kerry would say such obviously phoney baloney quotes might give critics of the network some evidence.

In this case though, I wouldn't blame the reporter unless he had inserted those in a legitimate story he knew was going to print at some point. It didn't look like it.

Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
Cowperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 10:28 AM   #4
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

If the average FOX viewer/reader read those quotes and thought they were real, I give them even less credit now.

I didn't read the original story, but it seems obvious that the author was just making fun of Kerry. Not really a new thing considering other strories that have been printed on their website.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 12:22 PM   #5
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Fuzzy McGillicuddy@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.
Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel?
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 12:37 PM   #6
Agamemnon
#1 Goaltender
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On+Oct 2 2004, 06:22 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Flame On @ Oct 2 2004, 06:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Fuzzy McGillicuddy@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.
Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel?[/b][/quote]
Well, one might point out the fact that Fox's television programs do exceptionally well in Canada, led by Family Guy and the Simpson's (for our demograph at least). Also, I think he's specifically referring to the Fox news channel that is slated for Canada at some point in the future.
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 12:41 PM   #7
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

I'm shocked one of the writers didn't write fake quotes for Bush... oh wait no I'm not.

Lanny is gonna be all over this one.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 12:44 PM   #8
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On+Oct 2 2004, 02:22 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Flame On @ Oct 2 2004, 02:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Fuzzy McGillicuddy@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.
Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel? [/b][/quote]
Are you suggesting that CNN and Fox news are somewhat equivalent?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 01:28 PM   #9
Agamemnon
#1 Goaltender
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by transplant99+Oct 2 2004, 06:44 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (transplant99 @ Oct 2 2004, 06:44 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On@Oct 2 2004, 02:22 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Fuzzy McGillicuddy
Quote:
@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.

Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel?
Are you suggesting that CNN and Fox news are somewhat equivalent?[/b][/quote]
Probably more likely that he's suggesting that from a Canadian's point of view, CNN gives a more 'mainstream' type of coverage to American politics, rather than FOX or (the best channel on television) PBS. CNN (attempts to) brings fairly 'average' reporting to the table.

However, I'd almost suggest that recently CNN appears to be leaning towards the Democrats. I recall the Democratic convention had CNN featuring Democratic guests. At the Republican convention, weirdly enough, Democratic guests. Methinks Ted Turner is (and always has been) skewed a little to the left.

Of course, it should probably be noted that Democrats and Republicans are both more conservative than traditional Canadian ideas of 'Left' and 'Right'.
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 01:33 PM   #10
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon+Oct 2 2004, 06:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Oct 2 2004, 06:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On@Oct 2 2004, 06:22 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Fuzzy McGillicuddy
Quote:
@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.

Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel?
Well, one might point out the fact that Fox's television programs do exceptionally well in Canada, led by Family Guy and the Simpson's (for our demograph at least). Also, I think he's specifically referring to the Fox news channel that is slated for Canada at some point in the future. [/b][/quote]
Yeah I'm exclusively talking about the news station, which is what I thought was being talked about. Is it not? I too like a lot of Fox shows, I'm all for reality tv drivel, just not the news kind.

I'm not really saying Fox and CNN are equivalent. Just that we can do better. I don't mind CNN at times though.
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 01:40 PM   #11
Agamemnon
#1 Goaltender
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On+Oct 2 2004, 07:33 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Flame On @ Oct 2 2004, 07:33 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon@Oct 2 2004, 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On@Oct 2 2004, 06:22 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Fuzzy McGillicuddy
Quote:
Quote:
@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.

Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel?

Well, one might point out the fact that Fox's television programs do exceptionally well in Canada, led by Family Guy and the Simpson's (for our demograph at least). Also, I think he's specifically referring to the Fox news channel that is slated for Canada at some point in the future.
Yeah I'm exclusively talking about the news station, which is what I thought was being talked about. Is it not? I too like a lot of Fox shows, I'm all for reality tv drivel, just not the news kind.

I'm not really saying Fox and CNN are equivalent. Just that we can do better. I don't mind CNN at times though.[/b][/quote]
Well, if you replied to Fuzzy's comment about how Canadian's are craving Fox News, I'd suggest that he was talking about how Fox is opening a news channel here, and that that might be what he was referring to, as has already been discussed on the board.

If you weren't commenting on his post, then I guess I missed something.
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 04:54 PM   #12
Fuzzy McGillicuddy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: up north (by the airport)
Exp:
Default

For those who haven't seen FOXNews (most Canadians haven't), don't confuse it with the regular FOX network. While the two obviously have the same parent, FOXNews is a cable-news channel, just like CNN. In fact, it's the top-rated news channel in the United States. And it's coming to Canada at some point.

I think many Canadians will be surprised, shocked and even appalled at the approach of this network. Others will accept the information they are fed as gospel. It's sensationalistic approach often skirts the boundaries of accuracy and fairness. But the Current Affair approach seems to be what most viewers want to watch (according to the ratings). You just know the guy they're reporting about is evil because of the music playing in the background.
Fuzzy McGillicuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 05:08 PM   #13
Lanny_MacDonald
Lifetime Suspension
 
Lanny_MacDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

It's FoxNews. What more do you need to know?
Lanny_MacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2004, 01:23 PM   #14
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon+Oct 2 2004, 07:40 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Oct 2 2004, 07:40 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On@Oct 2 2004, 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon@Oct 2 2004, 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On@Oct 2 2004, 06:22 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Fuzzy McGillicuddy
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
@Oct 2 2004, 02:27 PM
And this is the news network that Canadians are craving. It's all flash over substance. Somewhere, Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.

Do you have any reason to support this belief? Who's clamoring to watch Fox? If we want dodgy reporting, sensationalist coverage, no in depth....ness or a strictly American view point why can't they just watch CNN? Chir** Fox!? Why would a Canadian want that drivel?

Well, one might point out the fact that Fox's television programs do exceptionally well in Canada, led by Family Guy and the Simpson's (for our demograph at least). Also, I think he's specifically referring to the Fox news channel that is slated for Canada at some point in the future.

Yeah I'm exclusively talking about the news station, which is what I thought was being talked about. Is it not? I too like a lot of Fox shows, I'm all for reality tv drivel, just not the news kind.

I'm not really saying Fox and CNN are equivalent. Just that we can do better. I don't mind CNN at times though.
Well, if you replied to Fuzzy's comment about how Canadian's are craving Fox News, I'd suggest that he was talking about how Fox is opening a news channel here, and that that might be what he was referring to, as has already been discussed on the board.

If you weren't commenting on his post, then I guess I missed something. [/b][/quote]
I don't see how you got confused Aggy. I was talking about the news channel and if you look at my quote I talk about things like reporting and such, not The Family Guy etc. I don't know why you brought that up. So yes I think you did miss something.
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy