Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2025, 04:16 PM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Icon48 Subject to ratification CBA reached until 2030

Seravalli reporting new CBA framework will be announced Friday:

https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/news/nh...me-season-ltir

Quote:
he four-year extension would kick in on Sept. 16, 2026 and carry through Sept. 15, 2030. With one more year remaining on this current CBA, that would provide five total years of continuity for a league with three previous work stoppages on record. This is the earliest the NHL and NHLPA will have concluded an extension prior to expiration in Bettman’s 32-year run as commissioner.

Here are some pertinent details of the agreement, according to both league and union sources:
  • The NHL will move to 84-game regular seasons beginning in 2026-27. The preseason will be shortened, to an expected four games per team, and players with 100-plus career games played can play in a maximum of two preseason games.
  • Player contracts will be term limited to a maximum of seven years for players re-signing with their current club and six years for players on the free agent market. The 2025-26 season (next week’s free agency) will mark the final eight-year deals in the NHL.
  • A comprehensive playoff salary cap mechanism, which has many machinations to account for player acquisition, will effectively close the LTIR loophole for teams to significantly pad payroll by using injury relief space.
  • Signing rights to draft picks will be uniform across the board until age 22, regardless of the league prospects are picked from or which league they matriculate to next. In other words, if an 18-year-old CHL player is drafted but decided to play NCAA, a team will still hold his rights for four years.
  • Outlawing of player deferred salary in contracts, which previously lowered the cap hit of deals. This is one example of significantly more stringent contractual limitations that are expected to be in the new CBA for players.
  • Revenue split will remain 50/50 between owners and players. There are not expected to be changes to the definitions of what constitutes hockey related revenue (HRR).
  • Significant increase in Stanley Cup playoff bonus pool fund, nearly doubling previous amount.
  • Establishment of ‘full-time’ Emergency Backup Goalie (EBUG) position within organizations so that amateur goalies signed out of beer league are not entering games in rare injury circumstances.
  • Landmark player benefit improvements (health insurance and post-playing health insurance stipends), plus movement of player payroll taxes and worker’s compensation premiums to be paid out of owner’s share.
  • Teams will no longer be able to mandate player dress code for arriving/departing games.
  • As previously announced in February, the next three seasons of the salary cap’s upper limit: $95.5 million, $104 million and $113 million.

Spoiler!

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-27-2025 at 11:05 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 04:22 PM   #2
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Edit: Nevermind, this doesn't seem to change much except for the rights to players drafted out of the CHL.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-25-2025 at 05:34 PM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 04:25 PM   #3
JTech780
Powerplay Quarterback
 
JTech780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

That would be a significant change.

Under those rules I don't think a player like Trevor Hoskin would get drafted because his rights would expire before he was ready to go pro.
JTech780 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 04:26 PM   #4
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Needed after the change and NIL potential
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 04:31 PM   #5
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

that's a great decision, makes a ton of sense.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 04:40 PM   #6
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Curious to what grandfathering, if any, there'll be.
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."

"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
D as in David is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 04:53 PM   #7
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Still think there needs to be an additional rule that says "If a player is offered a maximum value ELC by his drafting team, that team retains his RFA rights even after this time period has concluded. After the expiry of the initial time period the player will be an RFA free to negotiate with other teams, but compensation would have to be provided."

So players can be come RFAs, but not full UFAs, which I think is fair. Because if a team offers the player the max ELC value it's because they want to keep him.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2025, 04:59 PM   #8
JTech780
Powerplay Quarterback
 
JTech780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Still think there needs to be an additional rule that says "If a player is offered a maximum value ELC by his drafting team, that team retains his RFA rights even after this time period has concluded. After the expiry of the initial time period the player will be an RFA free to negotiate with other teams, but compensation would have to be provided."

So players can be come RFAs, but not full UFAs, which I think is fair. Because if a team offers the player the max ELC value it's because they want to keep him.
So if the player's rights are traded before receiving an max value ELC, then he becomes a UFA instead of a RFA?
JTech780 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 05:03 PM   #9
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Maybe I’m confused but this seems like it leaves the NCAA issue virtually as-is and encourages even more players to go NCAA.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2025, 05:14 PM   #10
rhino
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
If this is true, then finally.
I was hoping for a system like the NFL and NBA for college players. You must declare eligibility for the draft which means you are leaving college
rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rhino For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2025, 05:15 PM   #11
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

No more going back into the draft after two years for CHL players?
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 05:25 PM   #12
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino View Post
I was hoping for a system like the NFL and NBA for college players. You must declare eligibility for the draft which means you are leaving college
Why?

I'd much rather a player develop at a college than play in Biloxi, MS.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 05:38 PM   #13
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Still think there needs to be an additional rule that says "If a player is offered a maximum value ELC by his drafting team, that team retains his RFA rights even after this time period has concluded. After the expiry of the initial time period the player will be an RFA free to negotiate with other teams, but compensation would have to be provided."

So players can be come RFAs, but not full UFAs, which I think is fair. Because if a team offers the player the max ELC value it's because they want to keep him.
At the very least, I think it would help if the team that holds the draft rights can offer a better contract. Give the team more flexibility for term, AAV, and bonuses if they hold the rights where as if they were a free agency signing, they could only get a standard ELC at league minimum.

Or make it so that if the team with draft rights offers them a max ELC and they turn it down, they are RFA until the following July before becoming a UFA. Don't take away the right for them to do it, just make it less enticing.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 05:41 PM   #14
rhino
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Why?

I'd much rather a player develop at a college than play in Biloxi, MS.
Eliminates players who get drafted then wait out the college term and become a FA
rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 05:50 PM   #15
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Also from the meetings

https://twitter.com/user/status/1938020724439982346
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 06:19 PM   #16
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

per Friedman other things believed to be worked on:

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article...-on-cba-talks/

Quote:
• Dropping maximum-length contracts from eight years (your own player) to seven (another team’s free agent)

• Draft rights until age 22

• The ability for some first-round picks from the CHL to have AHL eligibility earlier than currently allowed. (Some believe it should be one per NHL club as opposed to first-rounders because not every team has a pick in that round, but no idea if that has any traction.)

• No more deferred-salary contracts

• Creation of a “permanent” EBUG to practise and travel with their NHL team

• A revenue-sharing tweak to help some of the more middle-class teams

Whatever the case, it shouldn’t be too long until we find out for sure.

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-25-2025 at 06:31 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2025, 06:21 PM   #17
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino View Post
Eliminates players who get drafted then wait out the college term and become a FA
So you'd rather they rot in the ECHL?
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2025, 06:25 PM   #18
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Where is the LTIR loophole closure? Without that the game is a fn joke.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2025, 06:27 PM   #19
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

The Ahl eligibility just makes sense
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2025, 06:40 PM   #20
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

But

Deferred salary is only inflation predicting……(explaining for all you unwashed folk)
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to All In Good Time For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy