Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2022, 08:13 AM   #1
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default Test your basement for Radon

A guy at work got some radon mitigation work done on his basement and let me borrow his RadonEye detector. I had never really paid much attention to this in the past as we had an undeveloped basement in our last house. He had an enclosed basement and I have a walkout so I didn't think it would even be an issue for us but low and behold I am getting daily average readings of 491 Bq/m3 and anything over 200 requires attention. I expect everyone on our block would have similar readings and if you have kids in the basement you should get this checked. My oldest boy is living downstairs so this is an eye opener for us.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 08:36 AM   #2
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

For anybody curious about an approximate price for remediation, I paid $2600 to Radon Controls Inc in June 2020. They cut through the basement wall to outside, bored a concrete hole through the floor, shoved some sort of pipe (maybe ~5" diameter) into the ground underneath the house, attached an inline fan and it continuously exhausts outside. They did a couple other little things, but that was the total cost. Brought us from borderline over the limit in Canada -- and well over the limit the EU suggests -- to basically nothing.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 08:43 AM   #3
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

From what I’ve heard it can actually vary greatly between house to house on the same block since there are so many unique factors that go into the concentration.

I bought a device you can measure long-term results with (it’s digital and shows you as you go, just leave it in one spot and wait a few months). It’s interesting how it fluctuates over time (though thankfully our readings were all well under the guide levels for mitigation).
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 08:44 AM   #4
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Wait Radon isn't a scam?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 10-11-2022, 08:45 AM   #5
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Yup, based on an old thread here I bought an Airthings monitor and kept tabs on things. The 365 day average was about 220/bq m3 for the longest time which was borderline. Then 2 years ago after a new HE furnace things went to about 270. Levels are seasonal, and in hot weather things would peak at 365 which finally convinced me to do mitigation work.

Based on recommendations here I had Radon West do the work, even if it meant waiting. These guys really sweat the details in a very methodical approach. They did a stellar job - doing what Silver described, but also sealing up other massive openings in the slab. It was a surprise to learn about big holes in the slab below the furnace, the basement P-trap, and other places. Because of these variances in construction - it's not a guarantee that every house on the block has or doesn't have an issue even if you do.

Levels are about 25 right now post mitigation. You're also given an official 3rd party lab test kit after the mitigation so you can demonstrate to any future buyer the problem is solved.
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 08:50 AM   #6
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
From what I’ve heard it can actually vary greatly between house to house on the same block since there are so many unique factors that go into the concentration.

I bought a device you can measure long-term results with (it’s digital and shows you as you go, just leave it in one spot and wait a few months). It’s interesting how it fluctuates over time (though thankfully our readings were all well under the guide levels for mitigation).
It fluctuates daily with barometric pressure variances and as long as the average is below 200 you are okay. We have had peak measurements of 887 Bq/m3. Clearly we have to get something done with a kid sleeping downstairs but it's one of those things where I wouldn't have even checked if the kind fella at work didn't ask if I wanted to give it a try.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 08:55 AM   #7
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

For what it is worth, I believe the European thresholds are 400 BW/m3.
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:08 AM   #8
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
It fluctuates daily with barometric pressure variances and as long as the average is below 200 you are okay. We have had peak measurements of 887 Bq/m3. Clearly we have to get something done with a kid sleeping downstairs but it's one of those things where I wouldn't have even checked if the kind fella at work didn't ask if I wanted to give it a try.
887 is literally the highest number I've ever heard of in Calgary (obviously I'm not an expert, though). I'd be calling a company ASAP on that one.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:16 AM   #9
Dentoman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
887 is literally the highest number I've ever heard of in Calgary (obviously I'm not an expert, though). I'd be calling a company ASAP on that one.
I also used Radon West for mitigation in February, 2019. Very happy with their work and crew. Cost about $2800 at that time, but had to do some extra venting work due to lack of space/access to outside in utility room.
We went from 250-350 to 15 with our digital monitor.
We did it for the same reasons you are going to ... our daughter had moved down to the basement.
In the meantime, you can run your furnace fan on recirculation which did help bring the number down somewhat while waiting for the mitigation
Dentoman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dentoman For This Useful Post:
Old 10-11-2022, 09:18 AM   #10
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Should I buy this? https://www.amazon.ca/Radon-Eye-RD20.../dp/B01IH7SGCQ
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:19 AM   #11
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Would different rooms in a basement have different (average) readings?

We tested ours using one of those kits you mail in (after 5 months) and our reading was 155. However, that was in the main living area next to the furnace/utility room, versus the bedrooms (which are on the opposite end).
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:19 AM   #12
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

We got a reading of 197 but we are barely ever in the basement. So we will just leave it for a bit. Maybe recheck in a couple years.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:20 AM   #13
wireframe
Scoring Winger
 
wireframe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I've never tested for radon but now you guys are freaking me out. Which test should I get?


Is the risk lower in an old house? For some reason, I thought radon was a new-build problem. My house is from the 50's and I never even considered radon testing until now.
wireframe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wireframe For This Useful Post:
Old 10-11-2022, 09:21 AM   #14
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Our Radon level was 145 Bq/m3, below both the Health Canada (200) and US EPA (148) action levels, but still above that of the WHO at 100 Bq/m3. Given that, I've been apprehensive to get it done.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:30 AM   #15
Dentoman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
We used this one

https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B00H30TLPA/...2-587d01f975e8
Dentoman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dentoman For This Useful Post:
Old 10-11-2022, 09:31 AM   #16
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wireframe View Post
I've never tested for radon but now you guys are freaking me out. Which test should I get?


Is the risk lower in an old house? For some reason, I thought radon was a new-build problem. My house is from the 50's and I never even considered radon testing until now.
It really is about the ground that you are built on.

This is a good summary of it from a skeptical point of view. It is dangerous at high levels but the relative risk is actually pretty low.

https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4698

Quote:
Calculating your real risk is a bit more complicated. Your risk depends on other things as well: two most significantly. The first is where you live, because natural levels of radon vary a lot; and the second is whether you smoke. Of that 21,000 annual deaths from radon, only 2,000 of them are among people who have never smoked. Smoking is just not good for you, and among its hazards is making your lungs far more vulnerable to the kind of damage done by alpha radiation, though the exact mechanism for this isn't yet clear.
So risk is much higher if you Smoke. Also, it costs $2500ish to mitigate. Have to decide if that is worth the money for a low risk of having an issue.

5.4 pi/CL (what they use in the US) is equivalent to 200 Bq/m3 (what we use in Canada).
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 10-11-2022, 09:31 AM   #17
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
You could, but it seems pricey to me.

I bought this for like 20% of that price. It indicated we had a problem, so then we had the remediation company come in and they confirmed as part of their work with a way more high tech instrument. Then they left it with us for several months to show the levels had plummeted.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sliver For This Useful Post:
Old 10-11-2022, 09:32 AM   #18
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wireframe View Post
I've never tested for radon but now you guys are freaking me out. Which test should I get?


Is the risk lower in an old house? For some reason, I thought radon was a new-build problem. My house is from the 50's and I never even considered radon testing until now.
I live in a terrible area for it, work in an office in the basement, and can’t begin to think how I’d afford fixing it. So I just get anxious about it every few months until I have some repair money.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:32 AM   #19
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
887 is literally the highest number I've ever heard of in Calgary (obviously I'm not an expert, though). I'd be calling a company ASAP on that one.
My friend in Edgemont had an 1100 rating. both his neighbours had nothing.

Also he's had pnemonia twice since he moved in 15 years ago. Not good.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:33 AM   #20
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wireframe View Post
I've never tested for radon but now you guys are freaking me out. Which test should I get?

Is the risk lower in an old house? For some reason, I thought radon was a new-build problem. My house is from the 50's and I never even considered radon testing until now.
My house was built in 1969 (woot) and I had more than I wanted.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sliver For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy