Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2018, 05:38 PM   #1
hwy19man
Franchise Player
 
hwy19man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default January 24, just one game.

The lone OOT game is a Wednesday night rivalry game, Original Six style. It should make for a good doubleheader prior to the Flames game.

A reminder that the Flames game will commence on Sportsnet 360. The West channel will show the Flames games immediately following the Leafs-Blackhawks game, the other 3 regional channels will get it after a short SN Central post game show.


http://sportsstats.cbc.ca/news/NHL-Preview-Roundups.aspx?date=01-24-2018
http://scores.nbcsports.com/nhl/scoreboard.asp?day=20180124




1800h

at on the in the USA

and in french
__________________
----------

must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
hwy19man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 07:43 PM   #2
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Hawks up 1-0 Seabrook with the goal. Has a couple now since being a healthy scratch.
Samonadreau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 09:31 PM   #3
Robo
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Exp:
Default

Man the nhl has to be the biggest joke of a league how the heck was that Chicago goal a clean goal what is goaltender interference anymore? does anyone even know?
Robo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Robo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2018, 09:32 PM   #4
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Ha-ha what a joke the NHL is. They call the Matthews goal no good and they call the Hawks 2nd goal good which had way more contact. JOKE OF A LEAGUE. Just want consistency.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2018, 09:35 PM   #5
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo View Post
Man the nhl has to be the biggest joke of a league how the heck was that Chicago goal a clean goal what is goaltender interference anymore? does anyone even know?
I’m lost.

Guy lands on opposing teams goalie - good goal

Tkachuk nudges a guy who then slightly bumps his own goalie - no goal

It’s friggen ridiculous and they even have replay to get it right.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2018, 09:39 PM   #6
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Compare these two. You have to choose one as a good goal and one as a no-goal. It's not even close. Leafs get screwed way too much.

https://twitter.com/TheFlintor/statu...67243859804160



It's hilarious because it's the next goddamn game. Like..come on!
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2018, 09:52 PM   #7
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Go die Refs. Leafs win on the penalty shot.

Surprised they called the slash on Nylander there. Expected no call.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 09:54 PM   #8
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Just saw that tying goal........I'd be ticked if I was the Leafs as well. Horrible goal call.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 09:54 PM   #9
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Leafs get screwed too much? Welcome to the club as Flames and Oilers fans probably aren't going to feel pity seeing they got screwed in the playoffs. I feel the league needs to be black and white on these replays. If a goaltender is contacted it's automatically no goal. That contact on the Leafs goaltender was much worse than Matthews the other game or Tkachuk on Saturday. It just looks bad on the league when they can't get these calls right.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 09:55 PM   #10
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I agree that Matthews goal should have counted.

But on the Chicago goal, he doesn't fall on the goalie until after the puck goes in. I have no problem with it being a goal.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 09:56 PM   #11
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I agree that Matthews goal should have counted.

But on the Chicago goal, he doesn't fall on the goalie until after the puck goes in. I have no problem with it being a goal.
Before he even falls on him he impedes the goaltender's stick. I have a massive problem with that goal considering some of the goals that have been overturned on much less contact.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 09:58 PM   #12
jonesy
First Line Centre
 
jonesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Niceland
Exp:
Default

It is baffling. The inconsistency is unreal. Grotesque even.
__________________
When in danger or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout.
jonesy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 10:00 PM   #13
Machiavelli
Franchise Player
 
Machiavelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

A Predators goal yesterday was upheld on what I thought was pretty clear goalie interference.

Does the league know what they're doing? If fans are confused, I'm sure coaches and players are, too. Seemingly no rhyme or reason to why certain goals are called back for interference, and others aren't.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
Machiavelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 10:02 PM   #14
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Before he even falls on him he impedes the goaltender's stick. I have a massive problem with that goal considering some of the goals that have been overturned on much less contact.
My concern is with those that have been weakly overturned (Matthews' being the most recent example)
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2018, 10:03 PM   #15
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Maybe they should just get rid of goaltender interference as a reviewable play and only use replay to see if pucks cross the line. If the replay ruling is going to be a coin flip what's the point of delaying the game 5 minuets for the review?
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2018, 10:04 PM   #16
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

The league needs to talk to the refs and get their crap together. There must be some kind of guidelines they are meant to follow.

Personally I feel like goaltender interference shouldn't be challengeable. If the ref calls it a goal on the ice then it's a goal.

If the Matthews goal had counted last game I would be fine with this counting.

But how can the ref call Matthews goal good on the ice and then have it overturned over such little contact.

But a much more egregious situation tonight is called a good goal. It's a joke and if something like this were to happen in the playoffs it is going to look really bad.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2018, 10:05 PM   #17
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Yup. With slow motion reply, everything looks like interference. Just stop with teh reviews
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 05:09 AM   #18
Tsawwassen
Franchise Player
 
Tsawwassen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Final score

3 at 2 in overtime

http://scores.nbcsports.com/nhl/scor...p?day=20180124
http://sportsstats.cbc.ca/news/NHL-Recap-Roundups.aspx?date=01-24-2018
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.

Last edited by Tsawwassen; 01-25-2018 at 05:19 AM.
Tsawwassen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 05:23 AM   #19
Tsawwassen
Franchise Player
 
Tsawwassen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

I can't blame Seabrook for being ticked off at the linesmen for that blown icing call which led to the Leafs 1st goal. All 4 officials were terrible in this game!
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
Tsawwassen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 05:24 AM   #20
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Video review should be used for two things: to see if the puck crossed the line, and for egregious offsides. By that I mean the linesman can review an offside, but if he can't overturn the call while watching a replay at regular speed and no ridiculous magnification the call should stand.
N-E-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy