Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-17-2017, 10:59 AM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default Flames assign Kulak to Stockton

to free up a roster spot for Bartkowski

https://www.nhl.com/flames/news/flam...on/c-286862642
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 11:03 AM   #2
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

I like Kulak and hope he does well for the remainder of the season in the AHL. I think he is definitely ready for a top six spot next year though. Cheap contract and a reliable 5-7 dman, He is 23 years old now and will be almost 24 when the 2017-2018 will start. He needs to hit the next level next year or he may just end up as a tweaner for the remainder of his career.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:04 AM   #3
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

poor guy...numbers game and he holds the short straw.
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:08 AM   #4
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

He also hasn't been very good at times. Rookie d-men make mistakes, but he seems to be making the same ones over and over when it comes to putting the puck in dangerous situations in his own zone. Jokipakka does the same thing, but it occurs far less often.

He needs more time before he's ready for full time duty.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:11 AM   #5
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
He also hasn't been very good at times. Rookie d-men make mistakes, but he seems to be making the same ones over and over when it comes to putting the puck in dangerous situations in his own zone. Jokipakka does the same thing, but it occurs far less often.

He needs more time before he's ready for full time duty.
Or they can just play him for a consecutive 8-10 games and give him a chance to improve rather than all of the spotty starts. Let him get in his groove imo.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 11:13 AM   #6
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Or they can just play him for a consecutive 8-10 games and give him a chance to improve rather than all of the spotty starts. Let him get in his groove imo.
Uh, he played nearly every game in a stretch from Oct. 15 to Nov. 27. That's 15 games where he was in almost every single night. I think he was given a fair chance to hold down a spot.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:16 AM   #7
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Uh, he played nearly every game in a stretch from Oct. 15 to Nov. 27. That's 15 games where he was in almost every single night. I think he was given a fair chance to hold down a spot.
That stretch is also his first real chance in the NHL but I agree with your point as I must have missed that. I feel like he isn't any worse than Jokipakka and deserves a better fate. He is cheap so why not prepare him to take over a top 6 spot next year rather than Jokipakka who will most likely not be back next year.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:18 AM   #8
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
That stretch is also his first real chance in the NHL but I agree with your point as I must have missed that. I feel like he isn't any worse than Jokipakka and deserves a better fate. He is cheap so why not prepare him to take over a top 6 spot next year rather than Jokipakka who will most likely not be back next year.
He's similar, but Jokipakka is more consistent, largely due to his age and experience level.

Kulak has a shot at a regular spot in the NHL, but he needs to work on his consistency. What young defenseman doesn't?
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:24 AM   #9
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
He's similar, but Jokipakka is more consistent, largely due to his age and experience level.

Kulak has a shot at a regular spot in the NHL, but he needs to work on his consistency. What young defenseman doesn't?
That's correct that consistency is an issue. However, I still think I would rather have him on the main club than Jokipakka. He is 23 years old and has been around in the AHL for a couple of years now. I think his consistency can be improved in practice with other NHLers and learning from guys like Gio and Brodie in comparison to playing 20+ mins in Stockton (which also seems to be a pit for many prospects at the current time)... but once again, this is simply because I value and think Kulak is a better player than Jokipakka.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 11:25 AM   #10
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

All this desire to just let a young player learn the role, but then pages and pages of panic about the fact that this team isn't firmly in a playoff spot.

While it's not always a hypocritical ask from every poster, I find the lack of patience with results at the team level, combined with this constant ask to "just give the young players who clearly aren't quite ready more ice time" comical. Either we are in a rebuild or we aren't.

I totally get that most of the seeming contradiction of opinion comes from the false thoughts many have that Kulak, for example, is no worse than Wideman or Engelland (he might be much better value, but player for player those guys are better right now), but it's still funny and frustrating to read. People aren't giving this team any break on results in the standings, but then they also want them to ice less then our best roster to develop players. We can't have it both ways.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 11:29 AM   #11
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
All this desire to just let a young player learn the role, but then pages and pages of panic about the fact that this team isn't firmly in a playoff spot.

While it's not always a hypocritical ask from every poster, I find the lack of patience with results at the team level, combined with this constant ask to "just give the young players who clearly aren't quite ready more ice time" comical. Either we are in a rebuild or we aren't.

I totally get that most of the seeming contradiction of opinion comes from the false thoughts many have that Kulak, for example, is no worse than Wideman or Engelland (he might be much better value, but player for player those guys are better right now), but it's still funny and frustrating to read. People aren't giving this team any break on results in the standings, but then they also want them to ice less then our best roster to develop players. We can't have it both ways.
Although, I do think Kulak is better than Wideman and Jokipakka (not Engelland)...on what basis are you calling those false thoughts? Wideman has been garbage this year and the only reason I think they should play him so there is maybe a chance someone takes a flyer on him at the deadline.

As for the standings, I think there is both negatives and positives giving young guys a chance with or without playoff hopes. On one hand, they may not be ready. On the other hand, they may show urgency and emotion that can propel a team to stick together and win more games.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:32 AM   #12
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Although, I do think Kulak is better than Wideman and Jokipakka (not Engelland)...on what basis are you calling those false thoughts? Wideman has been garbage this year and the only reason I think they should play him so there is maybe a chance someone takes a flyer on him at the deadline.
I disagree somewhat. Wideman has been really bad lately, hence his demotion to 3rd pair, but earlier in the year he was holding that pair together while Brodie was having adventures all over the ice. Now that Brodie is competent again, Wideman looks terrible by comparison along with the drop in his play. He's slow and makes bad decisions sometimes, but at least he's consistent.

Kulak is an adventure from shift to shift and game to game. It's hard to rely on a player when you don't know what to expect.

Wideman on the 3rd pair getting 12 minutes a game is palatable for now. Kulak will get his chance next year when both Wideman and Engelland are likely gone.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 11:35 AM   #13
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Wideman has been garbage all year, in comparison to his pay check. Wideman is a better D-man than everyone on this team, not named Brodie, Gio, Hamilton and potentially Engelland.

Wideman is not a great player, he is the worst value contract we have on the team by far, and has been playing out of position all season at #4 (for the most part). Still doesn't mean he's not better than the players you list. Kulak IMO has better upside then Wideman right now (obiviously) and also can play games where he is better, but night in night out, Wideman's performance is consistently better then a young Kulak's at the moment.

I'm actually with you, I think one of the things that will get Kulak to be consistently better than Wideman is more opportunity. But this team has put themselves in a hole this year, and we have no wiggle room on results. Most of this board seems to think missing the playoffs would be a catastrophic step backwards. So do we play our best line up, or do we develop our players.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 11:35 AM   #14
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
I disagree somewhat. Wideman has been really bad lately, hence his demotion to 3rd pair, but earlier in the year he was holding that pair together while Brodie was having adventures all over the ice. Now that Brodie is competent again, Wideman looks terrible by comparison along with the drop in his play. He's slow and makes bad decisions sometimes, but at least he's consistent.

Kulak is an adventure from shift to shift and game to game. It's hard to rely on a player when you don't know what to expect.

Wideman on the 3rd pair getting 12 minutes a game is palatable for now. Kulak will get his chance next year when both Wideman and Engelland are likely gone.
Yeah, we can agree to disagree. Hopefully he improves in the next few months and solidifies his spot on the team next year.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 12:22 PM   #15
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Kulak and Jokipakka have gotten chances to play. Next is Bartkowski.

Do we see Wotherspoon or possibly Culkin later in the year? Unless we tank and fall out of a playoff spot I don't expect we see Andersson or Kylington this year.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 12:27 PM   #16
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese View Post
poor guy...numbers game and he holds the short straw.
because he isn't that good (at NHL level at this point)
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2017, 12:42 PM   #17
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
because he isn't that good (at NHL level at this point)
I tend to agree. Kulak hasn't really stood out at all.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 12:57 PM   #18
JTech780
Powerplay Quarterback
 
JTech780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

Kulak has great physical tools (size and skating ability), but he doesn't think the game very well and never has. Going back to past development camps and Penticton tournaments, his lack of vision and hockey sense was pretty evident. IMO he isn't a guy who will be an NHL regular, and end up in that 7th defenseman/call up role. He will be passed by the likes of Andersson, Kylington and Hickey in short order.
JTech780 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 09:12 PM   #19
flamesrule14
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Will Kulak be the Wotherspoon of the future? Guy who looks good at times and at other times not so good. Constantly getting called up and sent down. I want to like him, but his game is just not consistent enough. Yes he's a rookie, but he's had chances to grab a spot and he just hasn't done it. It'll be up to him if others pass him by or if he figures it out and finally grabs a spot.
flamesrule14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 09:52 PM   #20
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

I disagree with anyone who thinks that Jokipakka isn't better than Kulak. If he wasn't, he'd be on a plane down to Stockton right now. He's more consistent, and is a better puck mover. The one area where he's worse is skating.

Jokipakka is a serviceable #6 defenseman. Kulak is a decent #7.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy