Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-18-2016, 10:29 PM   #1
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Flames 4 Sabres 3 OT

http://www.calgarypuck.com/2016/10/g...4-sabres-3-ot/
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2016, 10:32 PM   #2
Karl
Franchise Player
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

So much better having a 4th line that can actually really generate some scoring chances.

No Brandon Bollig there helps that out A LOT.
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Karl For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2016, 10:52 PM   #3
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Yeah that 4th line is great. Two big physical wingers that can skate well and not handle the puck like a grenade, and Stajan looks decent too. Looks like he got back that step he lost last year.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2016, 11:05 PM   #4
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Nice write up. Re: the flames playing wound up tight, I think in part it's the early days of a new system. Almost every play has just a moment delay where it's like they are thinking about what to do. Especially the D. So many passes off skates and sticks because the check gets an extra half or full stride closer. And rarely hitting a F with speed. It probably goes hand in hand with confidence but I think the broken plays will just get a bit better each game. But there's a ways to go. Yeesh it gets scrambly at times.
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2016, 11:17 PM   #5
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Good write up as always. Weird to see the " bottom 9" carry the forwards but if that's what it takes right now, so be it. Stajan and Ferland with strong games.
Benett was great in the dot, but Backlund and Monahan were putrid.
I thought Gio was ok. He made some nice plays but definitely not as steady as you would like.

Versteeg is bad. He is a candidate for the press box. Unfortunately with Monahan and Gaudreau struggling, there is really no one to put on their line to get them going. That's not ideal.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2016, 11:47 PM   #6
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Good write up as always. Weird to see the " bottom 9" carry the forwards but if that's what it takes right now, so be it. Stajan and Ferland with strong games.
Benett was great in the dot, but Backlund and Monahan were putrid.
I thought Gio was ok. He made some nice plays but definitely not as steady as you would like.

Versteeg is bad. He is a candidate for the press box. Unfortunately with Monahan and Gaudreau struggling, there is really no one to put on their line to get them going. That's not ideal.


Faceoff stats for those curious:

Sean Monahan: 7/22 - 32%

Sam Bennett: 10/12 - 82%

Mikael Backlund: 4/17 - 24%

Matt Stajan: 7/10 - 70%
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hockey.modern For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2016, 11:48 PM   #7
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Good write up as always. Weird to see the " bottom 9" carry the forwards but if that's what it takes right now, so be it. Stajan and Ferland with strong games.
Benett was great in the dot, but Backlund and Monahan were putrid.
I thought Gio was ok. He made some nice plays but definitely not as steady as you would like.

Versteeg is bad. He is a candidate for the press box. Unfortunately with Monahan and Gaudreau struggling, there is really no one to put on their line to get them going. That's not ideal.


Maybe they try Freddie Hamilton on the top. Worked well last year while he was up.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 01:19 AM   #8
Monahan For Mayor
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
Faceoff stats for those curious:

Sean Monahan: 7/22 - 32%

Sam Bennett: 10/12 - 82%

Mikael Backlund: 4/17 - 24%

Matt Stajan: 7/10 - 70%
Don't see backs and Monahan get killed like that often.
Monahan For Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 04:10 AM   #9
gunnner
Crash and Bang Winger
 
gunnner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Exp:
Default

Great write up. Thought Ferland was awesome all game, hands looked good and was hitting. I know that 4th line was clicking, but I wouldnt mind seeing Ferland on the top line to see if that frees up a little space for Johnny and Monahan.
gunnner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 04:53 AM   #10
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Weren't the lines mixed up when the goals were scored?

Tkachuk-Stajan-Chiasson was a line I saw out there couple of times.

Ferland-Bennett-Brouwer when Ferland scored.

Versteeg was bad out there. He sits next game and Hamilton should get a try with the top line. Might get Dougie going too.

Bouma-Backlund-Frolik stick together.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
Old 10-19-2016, 08:08 AM   #11
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well the Flames can use the advanced stats for their benefit this year. Rather than having a decent record and putrid advanced stats they actually have a record under .500 with all signs pointing to bad luck.

6th in the NHL with a corsi for at 55%
29th in the NHL with a PDO of .942

that usually spells team that isn't getting the bounces

the PDO breakdown is save % at 29th and shooting percentage at 20th
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 08:13 AM   #12
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Weren't the lines mixed up when the goals were scored?

Tkachuk-Stajan-Chiasson was a line I saw out there couple of times.

Ferland-Bennett-Brouwer when Ferland scored.

Versteeg was bad out there. He sits next game and Hamilton should get a try with the top line. Might get Dougie going too.

Bouma-Backlund-Frolik stick together.
Pretty much love all of the line combinations in the bottom 6.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 08:17 AM   #13
bucksmasher
Scoring Winger
 
bucksmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Good write up as always. Weird to see the " bottom 9" carry the forwards but if that's what it takes right now, so be it. Stajan and Ferland with strong games.
Benett was great in the dot, but Backlund and Monahan were putrid.
I thought Gio was ok. He made some nice plays but definitely not as steady as you would like.

Versteeg is bad. He is a candidate for the press box. Unfortunately with Monahan and Gaudreau struggling, there is really no one to put on their line to get them going. That's not ideal.
As a Gio fan I thought he was awful. Bobbling the puck on a regular basis, several give always, hesitation and poor decision making stood out to me. I'm sure he'll get it sorted out in a few games.

Hamilton was another standout showing the same mistakes but to a greater degree. I got the impression in the third period that Kevin was reluctant to pass him the puck after Hamilton lost the possession several times with no one around him or with only minimal pressure. I hope Hamilton and Gio pull it together because I think this team's forwards are capable of winning if the defence can stabilize itself.
bucksmasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 08:38 AM   #14
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Weren't the lines mixed up when the goals were scored?

Tkachuk-Stajan-Chiasson was a line I saw out there couple of times.

Ferland-Bennett-Brouwer when Ferland scored.

Versteeg was bad out there. He sits next game and Hamilton should get a try with the top line. Might get Dougie going too.

Bouma-Backlund-Frolik stick together.
I pretty much agree with all of this except I would let Chiasson have the first crack on the top line. He's already been in several games and has some flow that might spark Johnny and Mony. He had a really nice shot from the slot last night that Lehner had to make a pretty good save on. After a pretty below average training camp, Chiasson has earned a chance on that top line for a couple of games at least. This will let Hamilton get his game legs under him on the 4th line playing alongside two guys that are already going well. Put either of Tkachuk or Ferland on the 2nd line, depending on who's going better in that game.

Gaudreau-Monahan-Chiasson
Tkachuk/Ferland-Bennett-Brouwer
Bouma-Backlund-Frolik
Ferland/Tkachuk-Stajan-Hamilton
extra: Versteeg
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-19-2016, 08:43 AM   #15
FlamesFan68
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksmasher View Post
As a Gio fan I thought he was awful. Bobbling the puck on a regular basis, several give always, hesitation and poor decision making stood out to me. I'm sure he'll get it sorted out in a few games.

Hamilton was another standout showing the same mistakes but to a greater degree. I got the impression in the third period that Kevin was reluctant to pass him the puck after Hamilton lost the possession several times with no one around him or with only minimal pressure. I hope Hamilton and Gio pull it together because I think this team's forwards are capable of winning if the defence can stabilize itself.
I agree. I would love to see the Flames pass the puck around like they did 2 years ago, however that isn't happening apart from Geaudreau. This win, if you want to call it that shouldn't have happened. That was a very blatant check from behind from Monahan, which is typical of this Flames team in the last 4 games. Very undisiplined penalties everywhre, from veterans! Also, the goal that was whistled down, yes it should have been a goal because the ref blew the whistle too quickly but is the first time I've seen them reverse their call even thought the puck wasn't in the net as the whistle blew. Wideman was out of the lineup, I'm wondering if the refs are now giving the Flames excessive slack now. Hmmmm...

Anyway the Flames should be 0-3-1 now, instead they are 1-2-1. There are still some very dysfunctional team play on the ice. We'll see where this goes.
FlamesFan68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 08:48 AM   #16
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesFan68 View Post
I agree. I would love to see the Flames pass the puck around like they did 2 years ago, however that isn't happening apart from Geaudreau. This win, if you want to call it that shouldn't have happened. That was a very blatant check from behind from Monahan, which is typical of this Flames team in the last 4 games. Very undisiplined penalties everywhre, from veterans! Also, the goal that was whistled down, yes it should have been a goal because the ref blew the whistle too quickly but is the first time I've seen them reverse their call even thought the puck wasn't in the net as the whistle blew. Wideman was out of the lineup, I'm wondering if the refs are now giving the Flames excessive slack now. Hmmmm...

Anyway the Flames should be 0-3-1 now, instead they are 1-2-1. There are still some very dysfunctional team play on the ice. We'll see where this goes.
Wow haha, we outplayed them the whole game and but we deserved to lose because their player flopped in OT?
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 08:57 AM   #17
FlamesFan68
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
Wow haha, we outplayed them the whole game and but we deserved to lose because their player flopped in OT?
Yes, absolutely. We lacked execution. Many times under Daryl Sutter the Flames had the "green hard" hat and outworked the other team. Back then we lacked execution too even when we outplayed other teams.
FlamesFan68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 09:12 AM   #18
puckedoff
First Line Centre
 
puckedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Stajan was best player last night I thought.
puckedoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 09:17 AM   #19
belsarius
First Line Centre
 
belsarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cranbrook
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
Stajan was best player last night I thought.
I was thinking Ferkland was the best out there but Stajan had a really good game too. Fourth line has been really consistent all 4 games at generating not only energy but offensive pressure.
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).

Fuzz - "He didn't speak to the media before the election, either."
belsarius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 09:23 AM   #20
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Man Versteeg has looked like crapola.
One good backhand pass in 4 games. That's it.

Definitely ready for him to be a scratch.
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FBI For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy