06-29-2016, 01:18 PM
|
#1
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Steinberg: Bouma on the market?
Steinberg just said he knows for a fact that the Flames were shopping Bouma at the trade deadline and the Ducks were interested
Last edited by sureLoss; 06-29-2016 at 01:22 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:19 PM
|
#2
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
Yeah, don't trade him to the Ducks, Brad -- unless you can fleece Murray.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:19 PM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
That's good. I think Chiasson was brought in to replace Bouma.. cheaper and hopefully we can get a 3rd round pick for Bouma.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:21 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
It's silly season, but with the Flames kicking tires on Martin I can definitely see Tree trying to upgrade the bottom 6. I love Bouma as player. Who doesn't? Cap is a liability for what he brings though. His 2.2 m a year eats up 2/3 of what Martin's cap hit would be if he gets his way.
Then add the cap savings off of Raymond and I think they've covered Martin.
4th line of Martin-Stajan-Hathaway seems like it could be deadly.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I wouldn't mind if they could trade Bouma and not take $ back and then sign Martin. I'd rather have Martin at 3 then Bouma at 2.2
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:26 PM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
|
My suggestion
Bouma 1.1 retained
For
Hartnell 1.1 retained
Clears cap for CBJ and gets a good player on a questionable contract to Calgary
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:27 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy
My suggestion
Bouma 1.1 retained
For
Hartnell 1.1 retained
Clears cap for CBJ and gets a good player on a questionable contract to Calgary
|
A little cap relief on the last year of Hartnell not terrible but not ideal
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:28 PM
|
#8
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy
My suggestion
Bouma 1.1 retained
For
Hartnell 1.1 retained
Clears cap for CBJ and gets a good player on a questionable contract to Calgary
|
What would both teams retaining $1.1M accomplish?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
3thirty,
Calgary Highlander,
Cali Panthers Fan,
Cheese,
Cole436,
Dan02,
Dan403,
EldrickOnIce,
Finger Cookin,
flamesfan1297,
foshizzle11,
GreenHardHat,
HotHotHeat,
ignite09,
jayswin,
Karl,
Madrox,
Monahan For Mayor,
MrMike,
N-E-B,
Resolute 14,
smiggy77,
Superfraggle,
Yamer,
Yrebmi
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:28 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
|
First Hall then Bouma ... dominoes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:33 PM
|
#10
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
What would both teams retaining $1.1M accomplish?
|
Hartnell's contract runs 1 year longer, so in that final year, Hartnell is a little cheaper for the Flames. Retaining on Bouma allows CBJ to clear as much cap as possible. Essentially, the only retention is 1.1 mil in 18/19.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bigrangy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:35 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
What would both teams retaining $1.1M accomplish?
|
Different term, Bouma is signed through 2017-18, Hartnell a year longer(2018-19). That way in 2018-19 when Bouma is a UFA Harnell will only have a caphit of $3.65M instead of $4.75M.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:41 PM
|
#12
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Yeah, don't trade him to the Ducks, Brad -- unless you can fleece Murray.
|
I'd agree with this but how many teams would really be interested in Bouma, pretty heavy contract for a injury ridden player. Ducks may be the only real destination for him.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:54 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I thought Bouma might have been a selling point for Lucic to come to Calgary as they are best buds.
Bouma is a warrior, but he just doesn't do enough. I don't even care about his offense. If he hit as much as Martin, he'd be worth it. Plus despite being a big body, Bouma seems to lose a lot of puck battles.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 01:58 PM
|
#14
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
|
I guess in a Salary Cap league you have to manage it carefully, but I still think a healthy Bouma is an important part of the team. Maybe they see a longevity issue with him or something. A healthy Bouma is built for the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sa226 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:07 PM
|
#15
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy
My suggestion
Bouma 1.1 retained
For
Hartnell 1.1 retained
Clears cap for CBJ and gets a good player on a questionable contract to Calgary
|
If the Flames trade Bouma its to clear up a roster spot and free up cap space not bring in a older player with a higher cap hit for longer.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:09 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Treliving wants to turn over the entire bottom 6 it seems
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:10 PM
|
#17
|
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp: 
|
It seems that Hathaway, Grant, Chiasson may make Bouma redundant.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Doug_Dadswell For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:11 PM
|
#18
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Wonder if this might have to do with the Gaudreau, Monahan, Bouma Superbowl fiasco.
Can't get rid of #13 or #23, but Bouma might take the fall.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:13 PM
|
#19
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit
Treliving wants to turn over the entire bottom 6 it seems
|
Good. The bottom half of the Flames' forward ranks is lined with bloated contracts and mediocrity, and not conducive to building a winning roster. Hope he turns the same kind of eye towards revamping the bottom half of the defense, while he's at it.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 02:14 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
Now time for Treliving to step up and make a smart modest trade involving Bouma.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 AM.
|
|
