05-27-2016, 10:38 AM
|
#2
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Hopefully we do! His play made Wideman expendable.
|
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:39 AM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Red Deer
|
They better.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey."
-'Badger' Bob Johnson (1931-1991)
"I see as much misery out of them moving to justify theirselves as them that set out to do harm."
-Dr. Amos "Doc" Cochran
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yamer For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:44 AM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Nakladal is exactly the type of guy good teams need to find to replace dead-wood within the lineup without too much effort and time. Assuming the contract terms are reasonable and he's a willing participant, it would be silly not to sign him.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:45 AM
|
#5
|
|
First Line Centre
|
They should, but I kinda feel like its only worth it if we ship out Wideman and Smid is off the roster in someway. With Gio, Brodie, Hamilton, Kevin and Engellend already back for next season, we realistically only have 2 question mark spots at the moment, that being the 5/6/7 guys depending on where you see Engellend sitting in the depth chart. With so many prospects looking to make the team next year(Wotherspoon, Kulak, Andersson, Kylington etc), if we are going to bring back Nakladal, it only makes sense if Wideman and Smid aren't around any more. If those 2 are still here, then the only place left for Nakladal will be back in the AHL and I don't think that benefits him at all.
We really really need Wideman and Smid gone. They are wasting money and space that we desperately need right now. Get them gone and I'd happily sign Nakladal, maybe even on a 1 way deal.
Last edited by JJ1532; 05-27-2016 at 10:49 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to JJ1532 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:45 AM
|
#6
|
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
They should. Provided he doesn't want significant scratch that is... 1.5M-ish max.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:46 AM
|
#7
|
|
First Line Centre
|
6x6
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:47 AM
|
#8
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
They should. But I have my fears.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:48 AM
|
#9
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
If they don't it will be the second straight year in which they have let a very useful player go. And I will hate our management for it.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:49 AM
|
#10
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I want his shot on this team so yes sign him please.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:49 AM
|
#11
|
|
First Line Centre
|
No, they'll probably pull another Anton Stralman, and let him go.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to flamesfever For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:50 AM
|
#12
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ1532
They should, be I kinda feel like its only worth it if we ship out Wideman and Smid is off the roster in someway. With Gio, Brodie, Hamilton, Kevin and Engellend already back for next season, we realistically only have 2 question mark spots at the moment, that being the 5/6/7 guys depending on where you see Engellend sitting in the depth chart. With so many prospects looking to make the team next year(Wotherspoon, Kulak, Andersson, Kylington etc), if we are going to bring back Nakladal, it only makes sense if Wideman and Smid aren't around any more. If those 2 are still here, then the only place left for Nakladal will be back in the AHL and I don't think that benefits him at all.
We really really need Wideman and Smid gone. They are wasting money and space that we desperately need right now. Get them gone and I'd happily sign Nakladal, maybe even on a 1 way deal.
|
I doubt he plays in the AHL. He would get an NHL contract from someone. He's completely capable of being 4-5.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:50 AM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
|
I sincerely hope so.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:57 AM
|
#14
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfever
No, they'll probably pull another Anton Stralman, and let him go.
|
This is the fear. I could totally see Nak becoming a top 4. He's only spent one season in north america and he looked great.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 10:59 AM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
If they trade Wideman (or another D) at the draft then yes, if not then there just isn't room.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 11:00 AM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Absolutely. Get it done.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 11:02 AM
|
#17
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I think they'd like to but he's more likely to test the market if the Flames can't move one of Wideman or Engelland.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 11:03 AM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I am sure the Flames want to - the scouting staff did a good job finding him in the first place.
Issue is unless we move a d-man then it's probably unlikely that he wants to re-sign here, would probably look at a team with less depth.
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 11:05 AM
|
#19
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
I am sure the Flames want to - the scouting staff did a good job finding him in the first place.
Issue is unless we move a d-man then it's probably unlikely that he wants to re-sign here, would probably look at a team with less depth.
|
So you're saying he's going to the oilers 
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2016, 11:05 AM
|
#20
|
|
GOAT!
|
1. You have the ability to make polls yourself now.
2. I think the only real questions are term and dollars, not "if" we sign him, but rather how long and for how much.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 AM.
|
|
