View Poll Results: Result: 1 bad / 10 amazing
|
10
|
  
|
2 |
2.11% |
9
|
  
|
1 |
1.05% |
8
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
7
|
  
|
1 |
1.05% |
6
|
  
|
2 |
2.11% |
5
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
4
|
  
|
5 |
5.26% |
3
|
  
|
9 |
9.47% |
2
|
  
|
42 |
44.21% |
1
|
  
|
33 |
34.74% |
04-27-2016, 06:31 AM
|
#1
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Lottery Fix - April 27th
http://www.calgarypuck.com/2016/04/l...ix-april-27th/
This is one of the worst in my mind.
Calgary stays at 6th but the teams in front gobble up all the top forwards.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-27-2016, 06:35 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
All I can say is thank god you are not doing the actual lottery.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 06:48 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
Only thing worse would be oilers or nucks swapping into 1st spot
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 06:52 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I think the oilers getting 2 or 3 would be worse than them getting first overall. This one is bad.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 06:53 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Not the absolute worst, but pretty damn close to it.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 06:58 AM
|
#6
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
|
In this sort of scenario, I could see Treliving trying to move up into the Oilers spot by offering a combination of our picks plus one of our better defensive prospects (Kylington or Andersson). Say we were to get Dallas' first rounder, then our first, plus the Dallas first plus Andersson.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 06:59 AM
|
#7
|
First Line Centre
|
Terrible. The Oilers and Canucks get 2 potentially elite wingers, conference rival get another franchise forward. We drop and have to take a defenceman, leaving our top 6 issues unsolved for 12 more months.
Horrible outcome, can't see how it could get worse tbh.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 07:32 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
I gave it a 2 rather than a 1, because no rival team moves up in the draft order. Toronto moves down, Colorado moves up.
Nothing against Sergachev, but I'd much rather have one of the players drafted in the top 5. He'd be a great prospect, but after a painful year like this, I'd want more. While he might be the best dman in the draft, I could also see him going 9th or 10th.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 07:35 AM
|
#9
|
Scoring Winger
|
In this case, we could maybe hope Dallas gets to the conference final. Perhaps we could trade them back their first round pick for Nichushkin or something, who seems to have fallen out of favour there.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 07:36 AM
|
#10
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
The first 3 picks go to conference rivals? That gets a 1 from me.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 07:51 AM
|
#11
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
2 - Not good. Nuff said.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:10 AM
|
#12
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
I suppose Oilers 1, Nucks 2 is technically worse, but the overall result is pretty much the same. I don't hate the Avs, but we don't need a conference rival getting better either. 1 for me. Boo Bingo.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:16 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
The Avs nabbed Stastny in the 2nd round once upon a time.
Then they got Duchene and O'Reilly in the same draft.
Not long after that they snagged Mackinnon.
They've done sweet F all with all that awesome home grown center depth, so if they pulled a rabbit out of the hat and got Matthews I would be so damn annoyed.
Also, EDM and VAN getting Laine and Puljujarvi is completely unacceptable.
This gets a -1 from me.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:24 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
This one is pitchfork worthy.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:25 AM
|
#15
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Blah... this is a 1. Oilers and Canucks in the top three and the Flames make a bad pick.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:39 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Trading down or not some forwards available would be
Nylander - skilled but inconsistent, could be gun shy
C. Keller - skilled but small
Gauthier - goal scorer who's production fell off
McLeod - fast and skilled but lower production
Jost - excelled at Under 18s and looks well schooled
L. Brown - big skilled, good potential
Drafting a defenceman wouldn't be terrible as we could always exchange him for a forward if needed.
Last edited by Vulcan; 04-27-2016 at 08:41 AM.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:43 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
This daily exercise is starting to really get me down. I haven't looked at the actual statistics of where the Flames wind up drafting in regards to where the odds say they can draft, but this just looks bleak. A top 8 pick will be great but man, would it be nice to get top 3.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 08:57 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
Yes, that's hideous for sure.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 09:22 AM
|
#19
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
All I can say is thank god you are not doing the actual lottery. 
|
Because Daly/Bettman have done so much better the last 6 years.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 09:25 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751
Because Daly/Bettman have done so much better the last 6 years. 
|
Touche.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.
|
|