View Poll Results: What will Bouma get on a 1 year deal from the arbitrator (or before ruling)?
|
1.5
|
  
|
2 |
0.64% |
1.6
|
  
|
2 |
0.64% |
1.7
|
  
|
9 |
2.88% |
1.8
|
  
|
42 |
13.42% |
1.9
|
  
|
61 |
19.49% |
2.0
|
  
|
75 |
23.96% |
2.1
|
  
|
52 |
16.61% |
2.2
|
  
|
42 |
13.42% |
2.3
|
  
|
16 |
5.11% |
2.4
|
  
|
5 |
1.60% |
2.5
|
  
|
7 |
2.24% |
07-05-2015, 03:04 PM
|
#1
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Bouma, Byron, and Jooris and 20 other players file for Salary Arbitration
http://www.nhlpa.com/news/2015-salary-arbitration-dates
Quote:
TORONTO (July 5, 2015) – Twenty-three players have elected Salary Arbitration:
NOTE: * signifies settlement
PLAYER ELECTED FILINGS
Arizona Coyotes
Mikkel Boedker *
Phil Samuelsson - July 21, 2015
Brendan Shinnimin- July 20, 2015
Buffalo Sabres
Phil Varone - July 27, 2015*
Calgary Flames
Lance Bouma - July 22, 2015
Paul Byron - July 30, 2015
Josh Jooris - July 28, 2015
Colorado Avalanche
Andrew Agozzino - July 20, 2015
Mathew Clark - July 22, 2015
Detroit Red Wings
Gustav Nyquist *
Minnesota Wild
Erik Haula - July 31, 2015
Nashville Predators
Craig Smith - July 20, 2015
Colin Wilson - July 28, 2015
New Jersey Devils
Eric Gélinas - July 21, 2015
Adam Larsson - July 29, 2015
New York Rangers
Derek Stepan - July 27, 2015
Ottawa Senators
Alex Chiasson - July 23, 2015
Mike Hoffman - July 30, 2015
Philadelphia Flyers
Michael Del Zotto - July 21, 2015
St. Louis Blues
Magnus Paajarvi *
Toronto Maple Leafs
Taylor Beck - July 24, 2015 *
Washington Capitals
Braden Holtby - July 23, 2015
Marcus Johansson - July 29, 2015
CLUB ELECTED FILINGS
Edmonton Oilers
Justin Schultz - July 24, 2015
Toronto Maple Leafs
Jonathan Bernier - July 31, 2015
|
Last edited by sureLoss; 07-13-2015 at 03:25 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:06 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
Have to think BT really wants to get Bouma done before arbitration. Things could get ugly otherwise.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:08 PM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
|
Gives us a second buyout window. If no one is showing interest in Raymond by the hearings, gives us the option to buy him out and alleviate the logjam up front.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Original FFIV For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:10 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
Let Byron walk. Let's hope things get ugly with some of these other players from other teams. Some good names on that list...
Boums and jooris desere contracts.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:11 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV
Gives us a second buyout window. If no one is showing interest in Raymond by the hearings, gives us the option to buy him out and alleviate the logjam up front.
|
And take a 4 year cap penalty? No.
We have space this season. If it really gets bad, we'd buy him out next off season.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:12 PM
|
#6
|
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
|
I guess sureLoss's server is fixed... welcome back.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:13 PM
|
#7
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Have to think BT really wants to get Bouma done before arbitration. Things could get ugly otherwise.
|
No doubt.
I do think it will get done though. BT obviously is a tough negotiator and this is merely one of the only pressure tactics the player has in this case.
Bouma coming off a tremendous season like he is, will want to get paid for it. The team needs to hold to a salary structure that allows them to hold on to many players in the next few years so they will want to go low on him. If it does get to arb., then it sets a dollar amount and the team decides if they want to match or not (they will as they can afford anything awarded this year and next) and then try and work a long term contract or deal him away.
Bouma is likely looking for 2.5 a year or better and the team is likely at 1.5 or so.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:20 PM
|
#8
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Wouldn't be too concerned yet as this just pretty much guarantees a NHL contract for all 3 next season and kind of puts a deadline on a deal between the two sides to get done.
IF they do go to arbitration, the Flames will elect a choice of 1 or 2 year deal before arbitration begins.
Since all 3 will most likely get less than $3.5 million in award (the actual limit is $3.5 million + an increase based on how much average salary has increased the past two years), the Flames will not be able to walk away from the Arbitrator award.
They can however trade the player and as noted a 2nd buyout window will open for the Flames.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:22 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I really only care about Bouma. Jooris was a nice story at the beginning of the year but really leveled off towards the end. You could say the wrist injury was a big factor but He's not on a Bouma level of importance to the Flames.
I never really thought Byron would be back. So this may seal his fate.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:30 PM
|
#10
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Halifax
|
Can we just not resign Byron please? Too small and can't score on a breakaway to save his life
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to foofighter15 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:40 PM
|
#11
|
Norm!
|
I don't think this was a great idea for Jooris. With the Flames depth, chances are they'll just walk away from any arbitrators decision.
Same with PB
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:45 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Even if Bouma goes to arbitration it works out well for the flames. The flames elect 1 yr the number between 1.5 and 3 the arbiter comes back with doesn't hurt us too badly.
Worst case is Bouma's play drops off after getting a 2 mil + arbiter award and we can't justify qualifying him and have to get a deal done before the qualifying deadline next year. But if he drops off that much his value to other teams won't be there.
Best case he meets or exceeds this years production and it's not a fluke and we sign him to a nice 3 yr deal at the end of next season.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:46 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I don't think this was a great idea for Jooris. With the Flames depth, chances are they'll just walk away from any arbitrators decision.
Same with PB
|
Flames can't walk away if the decision is under about 3.5 mil. The flames qualifying them assured them of contracts for next year.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:46 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I don't think this was a great idea for Jooris. With the Flames depth, chances are they'll just walk away from any arbitrators decision.
Same with PB
|
They can't walk away
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:51 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
what is the 2nd buy out window?
Not heard of that before.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:53 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
hope the Bouma contact negotiation doesn't take long...
Jooris and Byron are decidedly meh imo... i'd be nice to sign them, but i wouldn't be the end of the world if we didn't, as it seemed like we had number of guys who would step in and fill their spots without much of a drop off...
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:55 PM
|
#17
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
They can't walk away
|
They surely can. NHL teams have the ability to walk away in Player-Elected Salary Arbitrations.
|
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:58 PM
|
#18
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
what is the 2nd buy out window?
Not heard of that before.
|
http://www.silversevensens.com/2015/...efresher-guide
Quote:
The second is a window related to arbitration, and it carries some extra restrictions. For this window to open, the team has to have gone to arbitration. This window opens on the third day after the team's last arbitration is concluded and is open for 48 hours. There are also restrictions on which players can be bought out - First, the player has to have been on the reserve list as of the last trade deadline (so no buying out that off-season signing you regret until the next trade deadline). Second, there is a minimum cap value for a contract to be eligible for this - $2.75m AAV initially, but the value goes up based on the average league salary each year. The notable absence in those restrictions is that it has nothing to do with who went to arbitration, any player who meets those two restrictions can be bought out. Since this takes place after July 1st it could theoretically allow a team to buy out a new contract that they already regret as long as that player was on the roster at the previous trade deadline, though the CBA is not clear on that potential loophole. There's one last catch, though - this can only be done three times. Not three times per year - three times over the entire length of the current CBA.
The one exception to this extra window is when the only arbitration case is team-elected, and that player earned more than $1,750,000 (in 2013 dollars - it's adjusted up based on league average salary) in the previous season. In that specific case, the window does not open.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:59 PM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
They surely can. NHL teams have the ability to walk away in Player-Elected Salary Arbitrations.
|
only if the salary awarded is higher than 3.5 million, otherwise they can't:
If a player elects arbitration, the club may actually choose to walk away from the award and make the player an unrestricted free agent under certain circumstances. For one, the arbitration award has to be $3.5M per year or more. As with every other number like this, the $3.5M figure will index annually at the same percentage as the League Average Salary changes.
If it's a one-year election, the player becomes an unrestricted free agent immediately. If it's a two-year election, then the walk-away actually turns that into a one-year contract at the end of which the player becomes a UFA.
As long as the club has a walk-away right, they have 48 hours after the end of all their arbitration hearings to elect to walk away from a player. The amount of walk-aways a team may carry out in one year depends on how many players take them to arbitration.
http://www.wingingitinmotown.com/201...tion-boolsheet
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2015, 03:59 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
*sigh*
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM.
|
|