Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What will Bouma get on a 1 year deal from the arbitrator (or before ruling)?
1.5 2 0.64%
1.6 2 0.64%
1.7 9 2.88%
1.8 42 13.42%
1.9 61 19.49%
2.0 75 23.96%
2.1 52 16.61%
2.2 42 13.42%
2.3 16 5.11%
2.4 5 1.60%
2.5 7 2.24%
Voters: 313. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2015, 03:04 PM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Icon48 Bouma, Byron, and Jooris and 20 other players file for Salary Arbitration

http://www.nhlpa.com/news/2015-salary-arbitration-dates

Quote:
TORONTO (July 5, 2015) – Twenty-three players have elected Salary Arbitration:
NOTE: * signifies settlement

PLAYER ELECTED FILINGS
Arizona Coyotes
Mikkel Boedker *
Phil Samuelsson - July 21, 2015
Brendan Shinnimin- July 20, 2015

Buffalo Sabres
Phil Varone - July 27, 2015*

Calgary Flames
Lance Bouma - July 22, 2015
Paul Byron - July 30, 2015
Josh Jooris - July 28, 2015

Colorado Avalanche
Andrew Agozzino - July 20, 2015
Mathew Clark - July 22, 2015

Detroit Red Wings
Gustav Nyquist *

Minnesota Wild
Erik Haula - July 31, 2015

Nashville Predators
Craig Smith - July 20, 2015
Colin Wilson - July 28, 2015

New Jersey Devils
Eric Gélinas - July 21, 2015
Adam Larsson - July 29, 2015

New York Rangers
Derek Stepan - July 27, 2015

Ottawa Senators
Alex Chiasson - July 23, 2015
Mike Hoffman - July 30, 2015

Philadelphia Flyers
Michael Del Zotto - July 21, 2015

St. Louis Blues
Magnus Paajarvi *

Toronto Maple Leafs
Taylor Beck - July 24, 2015 *

Washington Capitals
Braden Holtby - July 23, 2015
Marcus Johansson - July 29, 2015

CLUB ELECTED FILINGS
Edmonton Oilers
Justin Schultz - July 24, 2015

Toronto Maple Leafs
Jonathan Bernier - July 31, 2015

Last edited by sureLoss; 07-13-2015 at 03:25 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:06 PM   #2
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Have to think BT really wants to get Bouma done before arbitration. Things could get ugly otherwise.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:08 PM   #3
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Gives us a second buyout window. If no one is showing interest in Raymond by the hearings, gives us the option to buy him out and alleviate the logjam up front.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Original FFIV For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:10 PM   #4
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Let Byron walk. Let's hope things get ugly with some of these other players from other teams. Some good names on that list...

Boums and jooris desere contracts.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:11 PM   #5
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Gives us a second buyout window. If no one is showing interest in Raymond by the hearings, gives us the option to buy him out and alleviate the logjam up front.
And take a 4 year cap penalty? No.

We have space this season. If it really gets bad, we'd buy him out next off season.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:12 PM   #6
underGRADFlame
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
 
underGRADFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

I guess sureLoss's server is fixed... welcome back.
underGRADFlame is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:13 PM   #7
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Have to think BT really wants to get Bouma done before arbitration. Things could get ugly otherwise.

No doubt.

I do think it will get done though. BT obviously is a tough negotiator and this is merely one of the only pressure tactics the player has in this case.

Bouma coming off a tremendous season like he is, will want to get paid for it. The team needs to hold to a salary structure that allows them to hold on to many players in the next few years so they will want to go low on him. If it does get to arb., then it sets a dollar amount and the team decides if they want to match or not (they will as they can afford anything awarded this year and next) and then try and work a long term contract or deal him away.

Bouma is likely looking for 2.5 a year or better and the team is likely at 1.5 or so.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:20 PM   #8
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't be too concerned yet as this just pretty much guarantees a NHL contract for all 3 next season and kind of puts a deadline on a deal between the two sides to get done.

IF they do go to arbitration, the Flames will elect a choice of 1 or 2 year deal before arbitration begins.

Since all 3 will most likely get less than $3.5 million in award (the actual limit is $3.5 million + an increase based on how much average salary has increased the past two years), the Flames will not be able to walk away from the Arbitrator award.

They can however trade the player and as noted a 2nd buyout window will open for the Flames.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:22 PM   #9
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I really only care about Bouma. Jooris was a nice story at the beginning of the year but really leveled off towards the end. You could say the wrist injury was a big factor but He's not on a Bouma level of importance to the Flames.

I never really thought Byron would be back. So this may seal his fate.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:30 PM   #10
foofighter15
#1 Goaltender
 
foofighter15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Halifax
Exp:
Default

Can we just not resign Byron please? Too small and can't score on a breakaway to save his life
foofighter15 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to foofighter15 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:40 PM   #11
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I don't think this was a great idea for Jooris. With the Flames depth, chances are they'll just walk away from any arbitrators decision.

Same with PB
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:45 PM   #12
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Even if Bouma goes to arbitration it works out well for the flames. The flames elect 1 yr the number between 1.5 and 3 the arbiter comes back with doesn't hurt us too badly.

Worst case is Bouma's play drops off after getting a 2 mil + arbiter award and we can't justify qualifying him and have to get a deal done before the qualifying deadline next year. But if he drops off that much his value to other teams won't be there.

Best case he meets or exceeds this years production and it's not a fluke and we sign him to a nice 3 yr deal at the end of next season.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:46 PM   #13
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I don't think this was a great idea for Jooris. With the Flames depth, chances are they'll just walk away from any arbitrators decision.

Same with PB
Flames can't walk away if the decision is under about 3.5 mil. The flames qualifying them assured them of contracts for next year.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:46 PM   #14
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I don't think this was a great idea for Jooris. With the Flames depth, chances are they'll just walk away from any arbitrators decision.

Same with PB
They can't walk away
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:51 PM   #15
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

what is the 2nd buy out window?

Not heard of that before.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:53 PM   #16
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

hope the Bouma contact negotiation doesn't take long...

Jooris and Byron are decidedly meh imo... i'd be nice to sign them, but i wouldn't be the end of the world if we didn't, as it seemed like we had number of guys who would step in and fill their spots without much of a drop off...
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:55 PM   #17
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
They can't walk away
They surely can. NHL teams have the ability to walk away in Player-Elected Salary Arbitrations.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 03:58 PM   #18
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson View Post
what is the 2nd buy out window?

Not heard of that before.

http://www.silversevensens.com/2015/...efresher-guide
Quote:
The second is a window related to arbitration, and it carries some extra restrictions. For this window to open, the team has to have gone to arbitration. This window opens on the third day after the team's last arbitration is concluded and is open for 48 hours. There are also restrictions on which players can be bought out - First, the player has to have been on the reserve list as of the last trade deadline (so no buying out that off-season signing you regret until the next trade deadline). Second, there is a minimum cap value for a contract to be eligible for this - $2.75m AAV initially, but the value goes up based on the average league salary each year. The notable absence in those restrictions is that it has nothing to do with who went to arbitration, any player who meets those two restrictions can be bought out. Since this takes place after July 1st it could theoretically allow a team to buy out a new contract that they already regret as long as that player was on the roster at the previous trade deadline, though the CBA is not clear on that potential loophole. There's one last catch, though - this can only be done three times. Not three times per year - three times over the entire length of the current CBA.

The one exception to this extra window is when the only arbitration case is team-elected, and that player earned more than $1,750,000 (in 2013 dollars - it's adjusted up based on league average salary) in the previous season. In that specific case, the window does not open.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:59 PM   #19
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
They surely can. NHL teams have the ability to walk away in Player-Elected Salary Arbitrations.
only if the salary awarded is higher than 3.5 million, otherwise they can't:

If a player elects arbitration, the club may actually choose to walk away from the award and make the player an unrestricted free agent under certain circumstances. For one, the arbitration award has to be $3.5M per year or more. As with every other number like this, the $3.5M figure will index annually at the same percentage as the League Average Salary changes.

If it's a one-year election, the player becomes an unrestricted free agent immediately. If it's a two-year election, then the walk-away actually turns that into a one-year contract at the end of which the player becomes a UFA.

As long as the club has a walk-away right, they have 48 hours after the end of all their arbitration hearings to elect to walk away from a player. The amount of walk-aways a team may carry out in one year depends on how many players take them to arbitration.

http://www.wingingitinmotown.com/201...tion-boolsheet
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2015, 03:59 PM   #20
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

*sigh*
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy