05-05-2014, 10:15 AM
|
#1
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Glacier Skywalk
Neat! New skywalk in the Columbia Icefields. Might be time to do a trip to Jasper.
http://glacierskywalk.ca/
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 10:18 AM
|
#2
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Nopenopenopenopenope.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hatter For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 10:22 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
At least it is only $25 unlike the $50 they charge at the Grand Canyon skywalk. It has been a while since I've to the Jasper area and I've been wanting to head out there for the glacier bus ride.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 10:25 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Awesome, I was gonna start a thread about this. It is on the list of to do's this summer.
I still want to get to Toronto to do the Edge Walk:
http://www.edgewalkcntower.ca/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 11:13 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
jasper is so much nicer than banff........the glacier walk looks cool - can't say that i am keen to do the CN Tower walk though....
can't get a sense of how high the glacier walk is above the valley floor
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 11:14 AM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
jasper is so much nicer than banff........the glacier walk looks cool - can't say that i am keen to do the CN Tower walk though....
can't get a sense of how high the glacier walk is above the valley floor
|
The number 300 ft is stuck in my mind.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 11:19 AM
|
#7
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
I didn't think it was done yet. I drove past it last Sunday and the whole thing looked under construction still. The glass floor was in though and there was no one working so I was tempted to stop and check it out.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 11:30 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
The number 300 ft is stuck in my mind.
|
I think that number is actually in meters, so you are pretty much taller than the Bow building (by 64m) above the valley floor.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 11:31 AM
|
#9
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
can't get a sense of how high the glacier walk is above the valley floor
|
Website says 918 feet.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 02:34 PM
|
#10
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
Awesome, I was gonna start a thread about this. It is on the list of to do's this summer.
I still want to get to Toronto to do the Edge Walk:
http://www.edgewalkcntower.ca/

|
Did this last summer. Highly recommended.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:05 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chalms04
Did this last summer. Highly recommended.
|
#### now i have to go to Toronto, and I hate Toronto
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:26 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
I think it's great and look forward to going there.
I do think however, that a better spot could have been found. Where it is and with the slope of the hill beneath, it is not as awesome as could be. Just my two cents.
I am aware they cannot move the grand canyon up here, and easy car access was important.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:30 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
The view itself doesn't seem to be any more interesting than you get from the side of the road, but I'm assuming the experience of being so far out form the edge would help that.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:35 PM
|
#14
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
The view itself doesn't seem to be any more interesting than you get from the side of the road, but I'm assuming the experience of being so far out form the edge would help that.
|
And lookin under you I think.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:36 PM
|
#15
|
evil of fart
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I thought it would be out and over the glacier?
|
It probably was when they started construction.
Have you guys ever stood on the glass floor in the Calgary Tower? That's pretty trippy. I imagine this would be a bit of a thrill and the price seems reasonable. It's enough to get me to go to Jasper this year or next.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:43 PM
|
#16
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
It probably was when they started construction.
|
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 03:55 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
I don't like this type of development in National Parks. This takes away from the landscape for a parlour trick. Better than doing this would be hiking up to Wilcox pass. An easy 4k hike with amazing views of the Athabasca glacier.
This is another thing built for the buses
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 04:45 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I don't like this type of development in National Parks. This takes away from the landscape for a parlour trick. Better than doing this would be hiking up to Wilcox pass. An easy 4k hike with amazing views of the Athabasca glacier.
This is another thing built for the buses
|
Makes sense seeing who owns it........
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 05:12 PM
|
#19
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uzbekistan
|
I think this development is silly given how many views there are from natural settings. parks Canada should be hesitant to open Jasper up too much to commercial development. It's charm is that it isn't another banff.
|
|
|
05-05-2014, 05:59 PM
|
#20
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:  
|
I'm a bit wary of more development in Jasper.
I also keep meaning to do some googling on the numbers and logistics - Brewster doing all these attractions (which means their branding on everything) vs. Parks Canada.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.
|
|