From Kindergarten through grade 8 i had a kid in my class who was allergic to everything. Anaphalactic reactions to dairy, eggs, peanuts, treenuts and seafood. The response then wasnt to ban everything it was to educate all of the students in the class not to share anything with that child and to wash hands after meals. To educate parents to include alternative snacks when bringing treats for the entire class and tat kid new to eat nothing that wasnt his.
The only time he ever had a reaction was one year trick or treating and he ate a donut after the robins person said it had no eggs. He gave himself an epi pen (he was 10) and we went back to his house. So from I have seen it can be managed effectively even with kids who will die in minutes.
However they are tragedies, and even with draconian bans death will still occur. If you can die from a door handle transfer then countingbin a ban to be effective cant save you.
There have been 32 anaphalaxsis deaths in North America
Quote:
In case series of fatalities from food allergy among preschool- and school-aged children in the United States, 9 of 32 fatalities occurred in school and were associated primarily with significant delays in administering epinephrine.10,–,12
|
http://pediatrics.aappublications.or...26/6/1232.full
So what really should be the focus is not fear based ban but better training for teachers and policies for delivering the epipen. Also is 9 deaths EVER not per year worth worrying about? Comparatively 5 kids PER YEAR in Canada and 18 per year in the US die in bus crashes or hit by buses.
http://www.stnonline.com/home/latest...at-18-per-year
In the end bans are reactionary policies based in emotion and not science and not backed by any literature.