Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-05-2013, 11:02 PM   #1
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default Special teams

We're almost at the 1/5 mark of the season, so I think some patterns and impressions about the team that's been assembled are starting to develop. One that has stood out to me has been the special teams play. It's been costing us so far.

Power Play

The power play is at 14.3% efficiency, good for 21st in the league. Home is 13.0% - 22nd, Road is 15.2% - 20th.

Last five games:
Nov 5 @ Min: 0 for 4 (5-1 L)
Nov 3 @ Chi: 0 for 0 (Missed penalty shot) (3-2 W)
Nov 1 vs. Det: 0 for 5 (4-3 L)
Oct 30 vs. Tor: 0 for 5 (2 SH GA) (4-2 L)
Oct 26 vs. Wsh: 0 for 4 (5-2 W)

The PP seemed to be working OK early on - simple plays, Wideman RH one-timer, and Cammy LH one-timer when he came back. I can't put my finger on exactly what's gone stale, but it seems the Flames might be a bit predictable? Puck possession is also a concern, as losing so many faceoffs kills a lot of PP time. Monahan and Cammy have been getting killed in the circle on the PP. Monahan's learning, but we need more from Cammy in this area. Colborne does well on the PP, even though his overall FO game is wildly inconsistent. Again, growing pains and a learning curve are part of it here.

I think Hudler and Wideman are good for both puck possession and play selection, even though Wideman's shot might be easily scouted. I would like to see another shooter or two try and step up and make the opposition take notice. I don't know if it's the traditional tendency to defer to a teammate on the PP so you don't appear greedy, or if it's a confidence thing - but we need more people being more assertive with taking shots. I think losing Stempniak and Giordano for extended periods has robbed the PP of two vets who would not be afraid to shoot.

Whether it's the occasional one from Russel or Billins (while he's here) instead of Wideman, or another forward like Baertschi or Glencross (before he got hurt), we need to be less predictable when it comes to shot selection.

The power play could have made a big difference against Detroit, and cost us the game against Toronto.

Penalty Kill

The penalty kill is at 76.6% efficiency, good for 27th in the league. Home is 92.9% - 6th, Road is 69.7% - 27th.

Last five games:
Nov 5 @ Min: 2 for 3
Nov 3 @ Chi: 2 for 3
Nov 1 vs. Det: 3 for 3
Oct 30 vs. Tor: 1 for 1
Oct 26 vs. Wsh: 3 for 3

The PK was atrocious to start the season, but has steadily improved just as the PP has begun to tank. I was surprised how highly ranked the Flames are for PK at Home. Three perfect outings at home recently helped that. With the work ethic the coaches are instilling, it stands to reason the PK would benefit.

But the road PK has not gotten much better. Again, I think the puck possession is a big part of this. Lose faceoffs on the PK and you can be scrambling around in your zone or fishing the puck out of your net. Street was getting killed early on, but the rest of the team is staring to fare better in this area. Backlund has been particularly strong on the PK faceoffs.

The PK couldn't be faulted for the Chicago 5-on-3 goal - the system was well executed, talented guys with that much space will beat you.

I think injuries have played a part here, as veterans you would expect to play this role have been out a lot or not healthy at the same time. Stajan, Stempniak, Giordano, now Glencross. Backlund has worked out OK in the role, I'm wondering if it's too much to ask of Colborne or Monahan to try out more on the PK. Maybe not as much for defensive starts (as much as you can manage that), but more shifts at least.

Out of the last five games, 3 have been close enough where better special teams play could have really had a positive effect on the outcome and game results. Hopefully the coaching staff can get them clicking better, and the players that are healthy can step in, accept larger special team roles, and deliver. Otherwise special teams will cost us more wins and points over the rest of the season.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post:
Old 11-05-2013, 11:06 PM   #2
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

Read the title thinking it was another Oiler thrashing thread, leaving disappointed.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2013, 11:08 PM   #3
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

I would have used quotes for "special" if it was Oilers related. Still, thanks for the note, I will keep it in mind for future thread creation.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2013, 03:02 PM   #4
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Surprised there hasn't been more action on this thread. Special teams more than anything are in large part an exercise in coaching and I'm shocked this didn't turn into a Hartley bashing thread (though I think Gelinas is running PP/PK). I agree with most of your points.

Re: PK, I really like the setup (diamond) with a focus on aggression and covering the high point while collapsing to block umbrella shooting. Much favor this to the tight passive box we've played for the last 5 years. However....it doesn't seem to be working as you've pointed out. I would tinker but not blow it up and continue to believe in it.

Re: PP, it doesn't look too bad. Your points re: puck possession and losing faceoffs I believe are a huge factor. Also I'm a fan of the break-in, wouldn't mind seeing them make the decision to drop to the trailer or pass to the winger closer to the opposition blue-line though (as opposed to closer to the red line/our blue line which kind of defeats the purpose). The strategy is there but it kills the play when we drop it too far away from the opposing blue line. Watch red wings for correct way to execute. Lastly we need a RH shooter who can one-time like cammy.....tough to find.

Generally though, I like both strategies for PK and PP and they definitely have a different flair this year. And I've hated our special teams strategies in the past as you may have figured out. I remain hopeful!!
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2013, 03:26 PM   #5
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Watching the Wild's 2nd ranked PP last night made me jealous. What I noticed they do better then most teams is that when they enter the zone on the PP, they treat it like they are still playing 5 on 5. Meaning no one stops skating. They don't play ''lax'' like lots of teams do on the PP. I noticed that they still skate and make plays like the other team has 5 men. They still play with urgency unlike most teams who take time to setup, set up formation, etc. It was a complete night/day difference compared to what the Flames were doing.

We haven't scored a PP goal in the last 6/7 games. Something needs to change quickly.

I think our PK will get better over time and will end up in the middle of the pack at some point. It's been a lot better lately, and the PKers block shots like crazy.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2013, 03:28 PM   #6
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

The PP entries using the drop to the trailer have been interesting. It seems we don't have too many guys who can execute it very well - Cammy does great at it, but I can't recall seeing another forward manage it very well. It seems like something Hudler or Baertschi should be able to manage - but the positioning and spacing also needs work, like you say.

I think the PK's numbers have also not looked too good so far because of the goaltending. I don't mean it's completely the fault of the goalies, but they haven't covered up mistakes or turned back good opposition PP execution very much either. The 5-on-3 in Chi being a noted exception.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy