Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2013, 10:54 PM   #1
stignasty
Self-Ban
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default After 7 games

I thought it would be interesting to look at the point totals of the teams in the NHL after each of them had played 7 games.

1. San Jose - 14
2. Chicago - 13
3. Tampa Bay/St. Louis - 12
5. Ottawa/Boston/Anaheim - 11
8. Montreal - 10
9. Minnesota/New York Islanders/Edmonton/New Jersey/Detroit - 9
14. Vancouver/Pittsburgh/Toronto - 8
17.Buffalo/Winnipeg/Nashville - 7
20. Colorado/Carolina/Los Angeles/Calgary - 6
24. Columbus/Phoenix/Dallas - 5
27. Florida/Washington/Philadelphia - 4
stignasty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stignasty For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2013, 11:01 PM   #2
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

Meh, we will catch up eventually, everyone is starting to play well and get in the swing of things. Hopefully Irving/Taylor can hold the fort
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 11:05 PM   #3
stignasty
Self-Ban
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

I heard a couple of comments from the talking heads tonight about how this is only Calgary's second win, and how they're basically sucking hind teet. So... I put this together and considering the games in hand on 29 teams, the Flames aren't really that bad off.
stignasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 11:10 PM   #4
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Which talking heads were those? because on Sportsnet I heard the Flames were playing better than the record indicates more than once. They were however discussing the slow starts of Cammalleri, Iginla and Kiprusoff.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 12:01 AM   #5
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

The team will need to take stock of itself at the 12 game mark, 25% of the season. If we're still way back at that point, we're likely not catching up.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 12:15 AM   #6
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I believe that this team is better then its record, They struggled with the new system and the new players, but really over the last three games they've looked like a very good team.

And a lot better offensively then we've seen in a long time.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2013, 12:39 AM   #7
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Personally I think if the team is going to suck better to really suck than just half arse suck, so better than last year so far.

I do not believe there will be any significant change in the teams prospects without at least one or two top 3 picks added and developed to replace Iginla and the nos 1 line.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 12:41 AM   #8
MyFlamesFirst
Powerplay Quarterback
 
MyFlamesFirst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I am much more excited towards next game because I know that every night we have a legit chance to win based on the small sample we have seen of these new flames. So far both Hudler and Wideman have been paying huge dividends, and Cervenka seems not too far behind. Combine this with the new offensive Hartley style and I am not so worried about the standings at the moment. If we continue to play how we are, the points will come.
MyFlamesFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 01:00 AM   #9
bigpete
Crash and Bang Winger
 
bigpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Definitely think the Flames are playing better than their record indicates. They have looked good and are just starting to really put it together the last couple of games. Gotta think there have been at least 3 games that we lost that coulda/shoulda gone the other way (Chicago, Colorado, even San Jose and Anaheim). The games we have lost we have barely lost and the games we have won, we have won rather convincingly.

It's especially hard being around Oiler fans every day who constantly shove it in my face that the Oilers are looking so good and the Flames are in last place. The Oilers have played 9 games and only have 1 regulation win to show for it. Plus I'm pretty sure they have a grand total of about 4 or 5 5-on-5 even strength goals all year. Food for thought!
bigpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 08:24 AM   #10
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

I have always though it was lame that the NHL is the only league to publish standing with no consideration of games played. In reality, it is much more accurate to call us half game out of a playoff spot than it is to call us DFL. Basically we are right on track for our usual 9th place spot
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 08:45 AM   #11
jlh2640
First Line Centre
 
jlh2640's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
Exp:
Default

Great game overall. Bouwmeester is sure playing good hockey at both ends of the ice. Wideman looked good as well. Things are starting to come together. I like all 4 lines the last 2 games. Now we need consistency and Kipper to get healthy.
jlh2640 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 08:48 AM   #12
AR_Six
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Or you could just look at the standings by point percentage... http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/pe...m=nhl&conf=all
AR_Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 08:52 AM   #13
Tilley
Retired Aksarben Correspondent
 
Tilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spokane, Washington
Exp:
Default

San Jose - good first, poor second, average third period
Anaheim - terrible first, average second, good third period
Vancouver - average first, average second, good third period, shoot out loss
Edmonton - dominant first, dominant second, good third (end made it look closer than it was)
Colorado - good first, good second, good third - then a terrible final 3 minutes
Chicago - dominant first, dominant second, dominant third, shoot out loss
Detroit - dominant first, dominant second, good third

The Flames have played four teams playing well (SJ, Ana, Van, Chi) and three average teams (Edm, Col, Det). They looked have looked good for the majority of the games they have played. The obviously need to clean up some elements of their game and the Kipper injury throws everything up in the air, but this team is definitely not as bad as it's record suggests.
Tilley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 10:22 PM   #14
stignasty
Self-Ban
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Each team's record after they have played 8 games:
1. San Jose 15 pts.
2. Chicago 14 pts.
3. Boston/Anaheim 13 pts.
5. Tampa Bay/St. Louis/Montreal 12 pts.
8. Ottawa/New Jersey 11 pts.
10.Vancouver/Pittsburgh 10 pts.
12. Minnesota/New York Isles/Edmonton/Detroit/Nashville/Minnesota 9 pts.
18. New York Rangers/Colorado/Carolina/Calgary/Los Angeles 8 pts.
23. Buffalo/Winnipeg/Dallas 7pts.
26. Phoenix/Florida 6 pts.
28.Columbus/Washington
30.Philadelphia 4 pts.
stignasty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stignasty For This Useful Post:
Old 02-08-2013, 05:06 AM   #15
Tsawwassen
Franchise Player
 
Tsawwassen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Already 1/6 through the season.
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
Tsawwassen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 05:32 AM   #16
icarus
Franchise Player
 
icarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Calgary Flames Playoff Chances
Beat Columbus 4-3 (ot), playoff odds up 10.1 to 47.5%
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/W...t/Calgary.html
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
icarus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 07:37 AM   #17
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Interesting to note that of our five losses, four of them came against teams that are a combined 29-5-6 so far this year.....the top four teams in our conference, and honestly the Flames weren't really outclassed in any of those games.

Really looking forward to seeing how the Flames fare in the next matchup with those four teams.....first up, Vancouver.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 02-08-2013, 07:56 AM   #18
Red
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Top 10 in goals for. Best in NW.
Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 07:58 AM   #19
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
and projected in the 8th spot ahead of Edmonton
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-08-2013, 08:14 AM   #20
jlh2640
First Line Centre
 
jlh2640's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
Exp:
Default

: )
jlh2640 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy