Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2013, 07:44 AM   #1
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Mali - French Military Event

This is a pretty complicated topic, and as many people know; the French are spearheading this one, trying to halt the spread of the al qaeda. I really haven’t done much research, other than us Canadians are sending a single transport plane, which seems like we might be leaving our ally (yes ally) with a long lease in what may be a “just cause”.

What really interested me in this latest article was we are cooperating with the ruskies! The nation who supports Syria, invaded Georgia, was the reason NATO was organized, is supporting France in a military event. I think the only reason we are reluctantly supporting France at all is due to our NATO membership.

Like I said, done nearly zero research on this topic, so we might not belong there at all, but I just thought it was interesting the Russians are partcipatating in a military event to the same degree we are (providing an air transport service).

EDIT forgot link!

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01...eign-minister/

Last edited by Kavvy; 01-21-2013 at 08:00 AM.
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 08:43 AM   #2
Cowperson
CP Pontiff
 
Cowperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavy View Post
This is a pretty complicated topic, and as many people know; the French are spearheading this one, trying to halt the spread of the al qaeda. I really haven’t done much research, other than us Canadians are sending a single transport plane, which seems like we might be leaving our ally (yes ally) with a long lease in what may be a “just cause”.

What really interested me in this latest article was we are cooperating with the ruskies! The nation who supports Syria, invaded Georgia, was the reason NATO was organized, is supporting France in a military event. I think the only reason we are reluctantly supporting France at all is due to our NATO membership.

Like I said, done nearly zero research on this topic, so we might not belong there at all, but I just thought it was interesting the Russians are partcipatating in a military event to the same degree we are (providing an air transport service).

EDIT forgot link!

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01...eign-minister/
Homocidal maniacs can bring together strange bedfellows.

Since no one important can control them, they don't have the usual mischief-making, geopolitical-minded friends.

Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
Cowperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 09:08 AM   #3
Baron von Kriterium
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Baron von Kriterium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Honkistani Underground
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavy View Post
This is a pretty complicated topic, and as many people know; the French are spearheading this one, trying to halt the spread of the al qaeda.
Yes, it is complicated and, like the Former Yugoslavia, often the truth is not what it appears in the mainstream media.

Let's examine the French motive. France:

a. was the first country to recognize the legitimacy of Libya's rebels who were allied with - or had ties to - al-Qaeda;

b. was the first country to recognize Syria's rebels, despite that the only effective rebel fighting force was/is Al Nusra, an ally of al-Qaeda;

c. now must intervene in Mali because there is a danger that al-Qaeda Islamists will over-run that strategic African country. Does that not seem rather a stretch?

The United States, incapable of allowing a military intervention to pass by without jumping on board, dutifully followed France in the Libya debacle, blowback from which was responsible for the re-igniting of the Touareg rebellion in Mali. France, with the US providing communication and drone power, now expands the Libya intervention to Mali in attempt to end the series of events it unleashed with the Libya intervention.

The Touareg rebellion, however, is not Islamist of the al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) variety and in fact the Islamic connection may well be a convenient bit of propaganda by both the eager French government and the shaky and opportunistic political leadership in Bamako.

So what is really going on? What do the Touaregs have that is causing such stirring in France's colonial loins? France is dependent on nuclear power for 75 percent of its energy needs. The larger African region inhabited by the Touareg, including in particular Niger, contains tons and tons of that substance required for nuclear power: uranium.

The world's third largest uranium reserves, as well as substantial crude reserves, are located in Toureg territory. The French mining company, Areva, lost its mining rights in Niger; they cannot afford to lose Mali.

But the insanity of the "war on terror" is that whenever a naked resource grab or land grab needs a bit of cover, one only need scream "Islamists", "terrorism" or "Al Qaeda" and the Western world jumps into action while the propagandized citizens scream for blood.
Baron von Kriterium is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Baron von Kriterium For This Useful Post:
Old 01-21-2013, 09:08 AM   #4
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

This thread won't be complete until some lame fool makes a "French surrender monkeys" joke.

Now that that is out of the way, the French still have huge amounts of influence and what amounts to an informal empire in the countries that used to be under their control formally before decolonization. Their efforts, as always, owe more to retaining that influence than to any other purpose, and our assisting them seems somewhat suspect in that light, regardless of what other good it may accomplish.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 09:15 AM   #5
Boblobla
Franchise Player
 
Boblobla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Are the shorts in that image standard army issue?
Boblobla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Boblobla For This Useful Post:
Old 01-21-2013, 09:22 AM   #6
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

I thought a Tourareg was a Volkswagon.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 06:40 PM   #7
Baron von Kriterium
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Baron von Kriterium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Honkistani Underground
Exp:
Default

Operation Serval photos from Theatrum Belli.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/theatru...th/8395449875/
Baron von Kriterium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 09:45 AM   #8
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have a hard time getting behind the quashing of a rebellion of an independent country by outside forces.

I know al qaeda are scumbags, but if a country wants to become under their rule then I find it hard to find a legit reason why they shouldnt be allowed to do so. If they choose to do so then the International community has other ways to restrict the country then.

This seems alot like the corruption that just occured in "liberation" of Libya. Alot of European interests in a "backwater" country and all of a sudden the locals decide they dont want them anymore.

I am glad Canada isnt committing any forces, only behind the scenes 1/4 logistical support. I do hope the French government is covering the costs at least of the fuel and maintenance.

This vehicle seems very cool..
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theatru...57632507552964

Pictures in the abof Flckr show a British C17, here is a comparison of that vs what Canada is sending C5. Wow is a C5 huge.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%

Last edited by mykalberta; 01-22-2013 at 09:50 AM.
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 11:11 AM   #9
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Canada has a C-5?
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 11:23 AM   #10
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

I think we have 7.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 11:46 AM   #11
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Purchased a few years ago IIRC.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 11:49 AM   #12
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Actually, isn't it the C-17 that we own?
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 11:59 AM   #13
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Isn't Mali one of those countries that still uses slaves?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 12:09 PM   #14
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Yes, progress does exist.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 12:10 PM   #15
Baron von Kriterium
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Baron von Kriterium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Honkistani Underground
Exp:
Default

RCAF flies CC-177 (C-17) not C-5 and we have four.
Baron von Kriterium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 12:31 PM   #16
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron von Kriterium View Post
RCAF flies CC-177 (C-17) not C-5 and we have four.
Pfft, should have known we wouldn't be flying anything cool.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 12:35 PM   #17
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I know your kidding, but If you see a C-17 globemaster up close, you will see how cool it is. It is unbelievable how huge it is. I can't imagine being next to a C-5.

I was at McChord Air Force Base in the early 2000's and got to see them up close on the tarmac after an exercise. They are some kind of machine.

I might even have some pictures I could dig up at home. I think i've got a couple old shots on the tarmac.
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 12:44 PM   #18
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

The big Antonov (the 225) flew directly over me when it was landing at YYC.

I was parked right by the fence surrounding the runway and it went right over top.

That thing was massive.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 01:10 PM   #19
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron von Kriterium View Post
Yes, it is complicated and, like the Former Yugoslavia, often the truth is not what it appears in the mainstream media.

Let's examine the French motive. France:

a. was the first country to recognize the legitimacy of Libya's rebels who were allied with - or had ties to - al-Qaeda;

b. was the first country to recognize Syria's rebels, despite that the only effective rebel fighting force was/is Al Nusra, an ally of al-Qaeda;

c. now must intervene in Mali because there is a danger that al-Qaeda Islamists will over-run that strategic African country. Does that not seem rather a stretch?

The United States, incapable of allowing a military intervention to pass by without jumping on board, dutifully followed France in the Libya debacle, blowback from which was responsible for the re-igniting of the Touareg rebellion in Mali. France, with the US providing communication and drone power, now expands the Libya intervention to Mali in attempt to end the series of events it unleashed with the Libya intervention.

The Touareg rebellion, however, is not Islamist of the al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) variety and in fact the Islamic connection may well be a convenient bit of propaganda by both the eager French government and the shaky and opportunistic political leadership in Bamako.

So what is really going on? What do the Touaregs have that is causing such stirring in France's colonial loins? France is dependent on nuclear power for 75 percent of its energy needs. The larger African region inhabited by the Touareg, including in particular Niger, contains tons and tons of that substance required for nuclear power: uranium.

The world's third largest uranium reserves, as well as substantial crude reserves, are located in Toureg territory. The French mining company, Areva, lost its mining rights in Niger; they cannot afford to lose Mali.

But the insanity of the "war on terror" is that whenever a naked resource grab or land grab needs a bit of cover, one only need scream "Islamists", "terrorism" or "Al Qaeda" and the Western world jumps into action while the propagandized citizens scream for blood.
The MNLA has offered an alliance with the Malian government and the UN-backed intervention force. This is likely because a) they don't want to get swept aside when the big boys march north and face extensive retaliation by Mali loyalists, and b) because the Islamists were handing them their lunch. The Tuaregs and the Islamists are two separate groups, with some overlap in the beginning, but with little since. The Azawad separatists (the Tuaregs) were largely supported by the local population in the north. They wanted to establish a secular nation in the north. They didn't have the ambition of conquering all of Mali, unlike the Islamists. The Tuaregs are separatists, and are far less threatening to the region than the Islamists.

By all accounts, the Islamist radicals that have moved in are not supported by the majority of those from Azawad (for instance, when they stoned that young "adulterous" couple, most people from the small town crossed the border to escape, an Islamist "chief" has since been killed by the local population in retaliation for his dolling out of Sharia). The MNLA, after being loosely allied with AQIM, have since fought them, and were losing. Basically, it was a cluster#### of three different groups that included the government, a separatists group, and another being basically akin to an invasion force post-Libya.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why France decided to intervene, along with the entire UN Security Council unanimously voting for an intervention (this is not a purely "Western" adventure, with the Malian government and the Economic Community of West African States requesting UN-backed intervention, and voted for by even China and Russia). An entire nation under the control of radical Islamists is a threat to the entire gas and oil industry in the Sahara region. The other considerations -- the reason this happened was because of the weapons that flowed freely in Libya leaving the West in a moral position to lend assistance, the majority of the population amongst even the northern separatists being against the Islamists, some type of remaining French colonial interest in the area, no one wanting another Afghanistan or Somalia, etc. -- are purely secondary. Perhaps they do matter some in why France is the one to have the boots on the ground, but they are not the primary cause behind the intervention itself.
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."

Last edited by HPLovecraft; 01-22-2013 at 01:16 PM.
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HPLovecraft For This Useful Post:
Old 01-22-2013, 07:01 PM   #20
sclitheroe
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Pfft, should have known we wouldn't be flying anything cool.
They are pretty cool..capable of operating from unimproved airstrips, can use their thrust reversers in flight to accelerate decent rate. They are also testing vortex surfing, where trailing aircraft fly in the vortex of a lead aircraft for fuel savings.

__________________
-Scott
sclitheroe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sclitheroe For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy