Quote:
Originally Posted by TurdFerguson
Yeah i had thought about that as well. For me the 1 year was more about evaluating the potential of the prospect. If they are worth keeping then a 10% raise in AHL dollars really isn't a big deal. It was more about the roster spot that player takes up - at least for me, that's how i looked at it.
|
Yeah I had that same debate in my head (I offered 1.25/3 years to the guys taken in the 2nd round).
A lot of these guys are 92s - weird picks for the 2nd round. I was probably better off missing on them and avoiding a further roster crunch.