| 
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 11:38 AM | #2 |  
	| Often Thinks About Pickles 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Okotoks      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by EddyBeers  I am wondering if anyone has heard whether Redford has collected those cheques from the no-meet committee members yet? If not, are those MLA's banned from the caucus meeting as Redford said they would be? |  
If you lost your seat in the election or just decided not to run, do you still have to pay the money back?    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 11:47 AM | #3 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl      | 
 
			
			I remember hearing about a candidate who lost who said they were not paying it back. I totally forgot to look it up until now, anyone know who it was?
 edit: Apparently, it was Paul Hinman, who said he didn't get any money for the committee in the first place, since he was on others as well. Makes sense.
 
				__________________"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
 
				 Last edited by Rathji; 05-02-2012 at 11:52 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 12:35 PM | #4 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Calgary, Alberta      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Rathji  I remember hearing about a candidate who lost who said they were not paying it back. I totally forgot to look it up until now, anyone know who it was?
 edit: Apparently, it was Paul Hinman, who said he didn't get any money for the committee in the first place, since he was on others as well. Makes sense.
 |  
IIRC his original comments were actually that the public shouldbe paying him more money than the cash he received for that committee. Something like "hundreds of thousands of dollars".
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 12:37 PM | #5 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Edmonton      | 
 
			
			I can't imagine that any of the members who retired or weren't reelected are going to pay back the money.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 12:43 PM | #6 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by GP_Matt  I can't imagine that any of the members who retired or weren't reelected are going to pay back the money. |  
I guess an promise made during an election really only counts if you get elected. We shouldn't really expect anything more from people, but for some reason I do.
		 
				__________________"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 04:31 PM | #7 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body      | 
				  
 
			
			A little off topic, but relevant. The MLA Pay Committee report came in.http://calgary.openfile.ca/blog/cura...-raise-premier  (I also know that it's openfile, but it's the first article I've seen to talk about the suggested pay structure)
 
	Quote: 
	
		| MLA base pay: $134,000 (including attendance at committee meetings), indexed to Alberta Consumer Price Index 
 But a $200 per meeting stipend would be paid to the chair of any assembly or committee
 The $134,000 value comes from taxable $75,000 salary plus a $37,5000 tax-free allowance
 Chairs and deputy chairs of committees would receive additional compensation
 Cabinet ministers, speaker of the house and leader of the opposition: $201,000
 Premier: Base pay of $134,000 plus additional, immediate addition of $134,000 for a total of $268,000
 An increase "commensurate with the duties and responsibilities of the role"
 In one year, that should rise to $301,500
 In two years that should rise to $335,000 to fall in line with "Alberta's highest paid public servants"
 |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 04:49 PM | #8 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			if you ask me that caucus is nowhere near big enough.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2012, 04:54 PM | #9 |  
	| Not a casual user 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by EddyBeers  I am wondering if anyone has heard whether Redford has collected those cheques from the no-meet committee members yet? If not, are those MLA's banned from the caucus meeting as Redford said they would be? |  
I doubt the minutes of that meeting will be made public.
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-03-2012, 12:26 AM | #10 |  
	| wins 10 internets 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: slightly to the left      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Northendzone  if you ask me that caucus is nowhere near big enough. |  
that's what she said?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 PM. | 
 
 
 |