Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-28-2024, 12:12 PM   #1
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default The Northern Super League and Calgary Wild FC thread

Formerly known as Project 8, the Canadian women's soccer league was announced today as the Northern Super League. So far clubs in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax has been announced.

Calgary's club to have their branding unveiled on Thursday.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1795514948761932176
__________________


Last edited by shermanator; 05-30-2024 at 10:53 AM.
shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to shermanator For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 10:54 AM   #2
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Calgary's club has been unveiled as Calgary Wild FC.

Thought I heard at the press conference that they will be playing out of McMahon. That is quite different than the rumour I had heard stadium wise albeit in the same area. If they are playing at McMahon, hopefully that means new turf with no CFL lines during play. Would give Cavalry somewhere to play CONCACAF games as well.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1796220018667253959
__________________


Last edited by shermanator; 05-30-2024 at 11:02 AM.
shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shermanator For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 11:01 AM   #3
fleuryisgod
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Ugh, McMahon is a horrible idea. Also different from what I originally heard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
Calgary's club has been unveiled as Calgary Wild FC.

Thought I heard at the press conference that they will be playing out of McMahon. That is quite different than the rumour I had heard stadium wise albeit in the same area.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1796220018667253959
fleuryisgod is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 11:13 AM   #4
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

McMahon with new turf has the potential to blow Cavalry crowds out of the water.

Centrally located, near transit, bars and restaurants close by, can get big crowds with lower ticket prices.
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 11:46 AM   #5
AndyM
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

McMahon is an awful, awful idea. Jesus. Aside from the turf issues, watching the CPL is painful at CFL stadiums. Cavernous. Hollow. Ugly. Old.
AndyM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AndyM For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 11:48 AM   #6
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Why not have this at the some faciality the men's round ball play at?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Just ignore me...I'm in a mood today.
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 11:49 AM   #7
M*A*S*H 4077
Franchise Player
 
M*A*S*H 4077's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Sweet branding, horrible place to play. New turf is a must but it’s gonna feel empty without 10,000+ people and just suck the life out of the atmosphere. Now that said I do look forward to checking it out!

I think they should’ve made a deal with the Cavs or go down to Shouldice. Put some money in that turf, get some bleachers on the other side of Hellard, reno a couple locker rooms like the Colts did, and now you’ve got an intimate 4000 stadium in a decent location (other than LRT access). I know there are plans (in early stages mind you) for a redevelopment of the Shouldice facilities and they’d be a great anchor.
M*A*S*H 4077 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 11:52 AM   #8
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M*A*S*H 4077 View Post
Sweet branding, horrible place to play. New turf is a must but it’s gonna feel empty without 10,000+ people and just suck the life out of the atmosphere. Now that said I do look forward to checking it out!

I think they should’ve made a deal with the Cavs or go down to Shouldice. Put some money in that turf, get some bleachers on the other side of Hellard, reno a couple locker rooms like the Colts did, and now you’ve got an intimate 4000 stadium in a decent location (other than LRT access). I know there are plans (in early stages mind you) for a redevelopment of the Shouldice facilities and they’d be a great anchor.
They should look at the Calgary Rugby Union.

Grass Fields, Stands (sit around 2000?) lots of parking and beer
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Just ignore me...I'm in a mood today.
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 11:53 AM   #9
cheevers
Scoring Winger
 
cheevers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

That name sucks but damn! What a badge!
cheevers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 12:06 PM   #10
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

I hope that they make money!
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 12:13 PM   #11
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

From what I've heard, Spruce Meadows were asking an insane amount to rent their stadium...
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 12:43 PM   #12
craigwd
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

If only we had some kind of fieldhouse.
craigwd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to craigwd For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 05:24 PM   #13
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
McMahon with new turf has the potential to blow Cavalry crowds out of the water.

Centrally located, near transit, bars and restaurants close by, can get big crowds with lower ticket prices.
Haha, blow Cavalry crowds out of the water? Maybe they could draw more, but say that’s 7000 people. They’re not coming back after the atmosphere of that crowd in a stadium for 30,000. It’s a bad decision to play there. It’s far too big, and even putting that aside the stadium and its amenities are terrible.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 08:44 PM   #14
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

CPL has only had 7 crowds over 7000 in their history, and Cavalry haven't sold out Spruce Meadows since the first year, so yes I think that would be blowing Cavalry out of the water.

I think a new club jumping on the wave of women's sports giving people cheap tickets and a central stadium can do quite well in the short term. This club is marketing to parents with young girls who don't give a #### about the stadium amenities. Now if they charge Cavalry prices, no chance.

Longer term they absolutely need something more suitable but to kick things off this isn't a big deal, IMO. Even getting a club off the ground is a massive step forwards.
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 09:42 PM   #15
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah ingress and egress at Shouldice or Broadview wouldn't be great.
When the Storm played those two years in the late 90s, it was at Foothills. Ingress and egress were fine, but one bleacher so 2000 was max capacity. The next year they raised the prices by double, which was the wrong choice and the team was done, to come back as the Mustangs the next year who played in McMahon in their year of existence.

I tend to agree with Sherm. $10-$20 tickets, cheaper parking, and get quantity of eyes on the game. Like the PWHL they've seem to have more national corporate sponsorship and backing than even the CPL, so losses, while expected for a few years, seems to be easier to absorb if they draw good crowds.

Sure maybe some of the environment can't be created as at Spruce (Spruce obviously would be a lot more racous if you didn't have one sideline wide open) but then the capacity would be almost doubled. So it's not so much about in match experience and home field advantage as it should be about getting people just to come out week over week.

Who knows, maybe they can and will put up temp bleachers in behind the nets and even along the sidelines so there isn't that big gap.

Last edited by browna; 05-30-2024 at 09:44 PM.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 03:21 AM   #16
Addick
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Addick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
That is quite different than the rumour I had heard stadium wise albeit in the same area.
Would you be able to share the rumoured location that you heard?
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”

- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Addick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 07:42 AM   #17
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Two of the main complaints people make about Cavalry are that the ticket prices are too high and the stadium location sucks. McMahon eliminates the location complaint, and if they eliminate the price complaint that takes care of another, and it's close to public transit so that takes care of another.

Combine that with the rise of women's sports, the fact that they are paying top 10 in the world in salaries in the sport, and the significantly better PR around the league compared to CPL and it could do quite well. Could being the key word.

I'm not suggesting McMahon will be sold out, I'm just thinking they have a shot at having more butts in seats than Cavalry.
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 09:24 AM   #18
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

I think the tickets to Cavalry games are more than fair, in the context of inflation, the tickets haven't really budged, and eliminating paid parking makes it that much more affordable.

Re Location: I am biased because I live on a farm north of the city, but since the ring road has been complete it takes 55-60 minutes of free flowing low stress driving to get to Atco Field, it takes 50 minutes to get to McMahon generally ok driving and it takes 60 minutes+ of awful traffic to get to the dome.

To me, the city is the city and it is never going to be so convenient that it impacts my choice.

The biggest impact is quality of the event. SpruceMeadows has the best venue for showing up an hour early and relaxing/taking in the vibes.

Last edited by TheIronMaiden; 05-31-2024 at 09:26 AM.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 10:25 AM   #19
Addick
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Addick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
Two of the main complaints people make about Cavalry are that the ticket prices are too high and the stadium location sucks. McMahon eliminates the location complaint, and if they eliminate the price complaint that takes care of another, and it's close to public transit so that takes care of another.
As one of the reasons I left Calgary was to live in a city where I didn't need to drive most places, the location of ATCO Field was a serious concern of mine when the Cavs launched. However, they rather impressively fostered a fantastic matchday experience that overcomes the location issue for me when I'm in town. Fingers crossed that Wild FC can, similarly, manage to overcome the obstacles McMahon poses in terms of providing an intimate football environment.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”

- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Addick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 10:48 AM   #20
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

To me the problem of McMahon is the gameday experience. It's not the marketing or the product. And sure, maybe they do have more fans, but it's still a cavern. I suppose YMMV, but I'd rather have a more out of the way place like Spruce Meadows and a better gameday experience personally.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
northern super league , soccer


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021